Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 95928
Received: 04/03/2025
Respondent: Mr Paul Tesh
Emphasis needs to be placed on protecting existing identified employment land allocation from other forms of development, ie preventing housebuilding on existing and allocated employment land.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 96030
Received: 04/03/2025
Respondent: Mr Andrew Marshall
Provided that the provisions and criteria are properly managed across the period of the plan.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 96323
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Southam Town Council
Southam Town, District and County elected representatives support this Policy Direction.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 96526
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Shipston Town Council
Emphasis needs to be placed on protecting existing identified employment land allocation from other forms of development, i.e. preventing housebuilding on employment land.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 96704
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: John Dinnie
Prevent housing on employment land.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 96901
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Alcester Town Council
Alcester Town Council, Arrow with Weethley Parish Council, Kinwarton Parish Council, Wixford Parish Council and Great Alne Parish Council (together referred to as Alcester Parishes Group or ‘APG’) strongly supports this approach. The current pilot project at Minerva Mill in Alcester has shown the value of a Rural Enterprise Hub to support rural businesses.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 96920
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Mrs Margaret Jeffery
Providing these are sympathetic to the surrounding area, especiallt the \green Belt
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 97148
Received: 26/02/2025
Respondent: Tysoe Parish Council
Yes
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 97612
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Mr Martin Winter
N/A
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 97795
Received: 05/03/2025
Respondent: Mr Gary Jeffery
Providing there is respect for the surrounding area.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 98526
Received: 06/03/2025
Respondent: Holly Farm Business Park
Agent: The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
It is unclear where Holly Farm Business Park would stand in relation to this Policy Direction.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 99342
Received: 06/03/2025
Respondent: Tania White
We need to preserve the wildlife that we have. Destroying the hedgerows will lead to less insects, birds, wildlife unbalancing the ecosystem in an extremely negative way. In SG20 Little Haven monitors moths which are in great supply. Do we really want to drive species to extinction that are currently being preserved by Warwickshire County Council under their Local Biodiversity Action Plan?
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 99354
Received: 06/03/2025
Respondent: Summers Holdings Ltd
Agent: The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
Agree, it is important to support development that contributes to a prosperous rural economy.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 99571
Received: 06/03/2025
Respondent: Mr Afolabi Okeshola
N/A
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 99725
Received: 06/03/2025
Respondent: Mrs Rebecca Loades
I totally agree with the support of current Rural Employment, as well as helping farmers to grown their businesses and provide education and employment opportunities for generations to come. Hence the need to protect farmland and green belt land.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 99750
Received: 06/03/2025
Respondent: Stratford District Council Green Group
Food production should be mentioned here, especially fruit and veg (horticulture). Polytunnels or other related development should be supported.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 99801
Received: 06/03/2025
Respondent: Welford on Avon Parish Council
This sounds like a recipe for uncontrolled development in open countryside. The rules here need to be tight and enforced.
We need food from our agriculutral land not more solar farms and further housing development.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 100146
Received: 06/03/2025
Respondent: Mr Adrian Parsons
Supporting Rural employment and diversification is to be welcomed where this is not done at the expense of green space and should encourage climate positive activities.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 100328
Received: 06/03/2025
Respondent: Mrs Lorraine Grocott
NA
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 100426
Received: 06/03/2025
Respondent: Mr Geoff Cooper
Broadly speaking, I support this policy, but I do not see Solar Farms as part of this. Certainly if tourism is part of this rural ambition I do not foresee anyone offering bus tours of such sites.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 101271
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Adrian Summers on behalf of the Summers Family
Agent: The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd
It is unclear where Claybank Farm would stand in relation to this Policy Direction.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 101279
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Dr Chris Clews
No.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 101447
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Mr Bart Slob
I agree with Draft Policy Direction 18, but with a focus on ensuring sustainability and local community benefits. Supporting rural employment and diversification is vital for thriving rural communities, but development should be carefully scaled to the rural setting and sensitive to the character of the landscape. Policies must prioritise sustainable transport options and minimise environmental impact. Agricultural diversification schemes should be encouraged but with clear guidelines to ensure they meet local needs and contribute to sustainable rural economies. Any new development should avoid over-reliance on car travel and be well-integrated into existing rural infrastructure.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 101612
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Mr Vincent Rollason
This development is not good for the t
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 101845
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Mr Andrew Crump
However, it is instructive to note that over half of the residents of South Warwickshire live outside urban areas and many of them travel to and from such areas to work. This will also be the position in relation to new residents at Meon Vale and at Marston Airfield if significant developments occur there, in the absence of adequate employment infrastructure provision in the immediate locality. That is why large settlements should be located close to existing urban centres with suitable road and other transport infrastructure, and not simply developed from nothing in unsuitable rural locations.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 101947
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council
Bishop’s Tachbrook Parish Council supports small-scale rural employment development, including converting redundant agricultural buildings, but seeks clearer policy guidelines. It assumes policies will apply only outside settlement boundaries and Strategic Growth Areas. The Council finds "scale appropriate to location" too vague and proposes specific limits: buildings up to 500m² within 1,500m² compounds, with exceptions for sites near settlements. Agricultural buildings could be replaced or converted within the same footprint. Additionally, the Council suggests limits on external ancillary space, such as capping overall site area at three times the building footprint, to ensure appropriate rural development.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 102070
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Rough Hill Rare Breeds Ltd
Agent: RCA Regeneration
Further supporting text should be included to set out what would be supported as agricultural diversification and rural business expansion, to assist and support rural businesses.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 102079
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Rough Hill Rare Breeds Ltd
Agent: RCA Regeneration
Further supporting text should be included to set out what would be supported as agricultural diversification and rural business expansion, to assist and support rural businesses.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 102276
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Mr Doug Wallace
N/A
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Representation ID: 103185
Received: 07/03/2025
Respondent: Mr Stephen Currie
I support this policy especially as it should provide local food growing and thereby food security in forthcoming climate challenges. There is need for more 'local community' carbon capture tree planting which will require tree planting, irrigation and arboreal management for a very long period of time or until emissions are reversed.