Showing comments and forms 31 to 60 of 71

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 95928

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Paul Tesh

Representation Summary:

Emphasis needs to be placed on protecting existing identified employment land allocation from other forms of development, ie preventing housebuilding on existing and allocated employment land.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 96030

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Andrew Marshall

Representation Summary:

Provided that the provisions and criteria are properly managed across the period of the plan.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 96323

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Southam Town Council

Representation Summary:

Southam Town, District and County elected representatives support this Policy Direction.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 96526

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Shipston Town Council

Representation Summary:

Emphasis needs to be placed on protecting existing identified employment land allocation from other forms of development, i.e. preventing housebuilding on employment land.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 96704

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: John Dinnie

Representation Summary:

Prevent housing on employment land.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 96901

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Alcester Town Council

Representation Summary:

Alcester Town Council, Arrow with Weethley Parish Council, Kinwarton Parish Council, Wixford Parish Council and Great Alne Parish Council (together referred to as Alcester Parishes Group or ‘APG’) strongly supports this approach. The current pilot project at Minerva Mill in Alcester has shown the value of a Rural Enterprise Hub to support rural businesses.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 96920

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Margaret Jeffery

Representation Summary:

Providing these are sympathetic to the surrounding area, especiallt the \green Belt

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 97148

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Tysoe Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Yes

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 97612

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Martin Winter

Representation Summary:

N/A

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 97795

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Gary Jeffery

Representation Summary:

Providing there is respect for the surrounding area.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 98526

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Holly Farm Business Park

Agent: The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

Representation Summary:

It is unclear where Holly Farm Business Park would stand in relation to this Policy Direction.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 99342

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Tania White

Representation Summary:

We need to preserve the wildlife that we have. Destroying the hedgerows will lead to less insects, birds, wildlife unbalancing the ecosystem in an extremely negative way. In SG20 Little Haven monitors moths which are in great supply. Do we really want to drive species to extinction that are currently being preserved by Warwickshire County Council under their Local Biodiversity Action Plan?

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 99354

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Summers Holdings Ltd

Agent: The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

Representation Summary:

Agree, it is important to support development that contributes to a prosperous rural economy.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 99571

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Afolabi Okeshola

Representation Summary:

N/A

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 99725

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Rebecca Loades

Representation Summary:

I totally agree with the support of current Rural Employment, as well as helping farmers to grown their businesses and provide education and employment opportunities for generations to come. Hence the need to protect farmland and green belt land.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 99750

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Stratford District Council Green Group

Representation Summary:

Food production should be mentioned here, especially fruit and veg (horticulture). Polytunnels or other related development should be supported.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 99801

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Welford on Avon Parish Council

Representation Summary:

This sounds like a recipe for uncontrolled development in open countryside. The rules here need to be tight and enforced.

We need food from our agriculutral land not more solar farms and further housing development.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 100146

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Adrian Parsons

Representation Summary:

Supporting Rural employment and diversification is to be welcomed where this is not done at the expense of green space and should encourage climate positive activities.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 100328

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Lorraine Grocott

Representation Summary:

NA

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 100426

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Geoff Cooper

Representation Summary:

Broadly speaking, I support this policy, but I do not see Solar Farms as part of this. Certainly if tourism is part of this rural ambition I do not foresee anyone offering bus tours of such sites.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 101271

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Adrian Summers on behalf of the Summers Family

Agent: The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

Representation Summary:

It is unclear where Claybank Farm would stand in relation to this Policy Direction.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 101279

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Dr Chris Clews

Representation Summary:

No.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 101447

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Bart Slob

Representation Summary:

I agree with Draft Policy Direction 18, but with a focus on ensuring sustainability and local community benefits. Supporting rural employment and diversification is vital for thriving rural communities, but development should be carefully scaled to the rural setting and sensitive to the character of the landscape. Policies must prioritise sustainable transport options and minimise environmental impact. Agricultural diversification schemes should be encouraged but with clear guidelines to ensure they meet local needs and contribute to sustainable rural economies. Any new development should avoid over-reliance on car travel and be well-integrated into existing rural infrastructure.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 101612

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Vincent Rollason

Representation Summary:

This development is not good for the t

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 101845

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Andrew Crump

Representation Summary:

However, it is instructive to note that over half of the residents of South Warwickshire live outside urban areas and many of them travel to and from such areas to work. This will also be the position in relation to new residents at Meon Vale and at Marston Airfield if significant developments occur there, in the absence of adequate employment infrastructure provision in the immediate locality. That is why large settlements should be located close to existing urban centres with suitable road and other transport infrastructure, and not simply developed from nothing in unsuitable rural locations.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 101947

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Bishop’s Tachbrook Parish Council supports small-scale rural employment development, including converting redundant agricultural buildings, but seeks clearer policy guidelines. It assumes policies will apply only outside settlement boundaries and Strategic Growth Areas. The Council finds "scale appropriate to location" too vague and proposes specific limits: buildings up to 500m² within 1,500m² compounds, with exceptions for sites near settlements. Agricultural buildings could be replaced or converted within the same footprint. Additionally, the Council suggests limits on external ancillary space, such as capping overall site area at three times the building footprint, to ensure appropriate rural development.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 102070

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Rough Hill Rare Breeds Ltd

Agent: RCA Regeneration

Representation Summary:

Further supporting text should be included to set out what would be supported as agricultural diversification and rural business expansion, to assist and support rural businesses.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 102079

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Rough Hill Rare Breeds Ltd

Agent: RCA Regeneration

Representation Summary:

Further supporting text should be included to set out what would be supported as agricultural diversification and rural business expansion, to assist and support rural businesses.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 102276

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Doug Wallace

Representation Summary:

N/A

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 103185

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Stephen Currie

Representation Summary:

I support this policy especially as it should provide local food growing and thereby food security in forthcoming climate challenges. There is need for more 'local community' carbon capture tree planting which will require tree planting, irrigation and arboreal management for a very long period of time or until emissions are reversed.