Showing comments and forms 1 to 30 of 58

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 86076

Received: 12/01/2025

Respondent: Sandy McCaskie

Representation Summary:

N/A

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 86665

Received: 29/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Peter Bridgewater

Representation Summary:

A spread of employment and commercial premises should be provided to avoid a catastrophic collapse of one industry impacting the area too heavily.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 86916

Received: 31/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Arthur Hogan-Fleming

Representation Summary:

-

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 87396

Received: 08/02/2025

Respondent: Cllr Andrew Day

Representation Summary:

None

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 87577

Received: 09/02/2025

Respondent: mrs susan morris

Representation Summary:

As long as these employment space is suitable for the type of employment

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 88422

Received: 15/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Maurice Stokes

Representation Summary:

Providing stepping stones within the industrial sector for growth is essential.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 88691

Received: 17/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Ida Marjorie Brown

Representation Summary:

Agree but i struggle with the wording "affordable". Business rates and rents need to have a long term reduction incentive of 5-10 years for innovative small business to launch and succeed. The sooner UK PLC have a long term view on new business and supporting of the better.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 88823

Received: 18/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sidney Syson

Representation Summary:

Good idea especially the live-work proposal.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 88895

Received: 18/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sara Aspley

Representation Summary:

xc

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 89038

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Stratford upon Avon District Council

Representation Summary:

i agree

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 89249

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Jon Knight

Representation Summary:

The live-work units sound like a good idea, especially if placed within the centres of the new town larger settlements presented in this plan (the 6000-10000 house areas). They could help form part of the local "town centre" for the new settlements and give communities a sense of place and purpose.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 89408

Received: 20/02/2025

Respondent: Amanda Knight

Representation Summary:

No additional comments

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 91167

Received: 25/02/2025

Respondent: Radford Semele Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Radford Semele Parish Council agrees with the suggestions.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 91265

Received: 25/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Geoff Norman

Representation Summary:

Sensible

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 91756

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Joanne Taylor

Representation Summary:

I agree providing pedestrian access, cycle routes and nature and ecological considerations are taken into account

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 92441

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Julian Brown

Representation Summary:

Agree

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 92901

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Meon Vale Residents Association

Representation Summary:

Policy guidance is needed on parking provision for live – work units. A recent appeal decision on the Crest Nicholson site at Meon Vale accepted a reduced level of parking by designating a bedroom as a home office.
There is a growing evidence of the need for affordable small business and retail units to serve the new community of Meon Vale.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 92949

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Alison Blake

Representation Summary:

Seems like common sense

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 93896

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Beverley Comley

Representation Summary:

No more warehousing needed as Banbury has ample empty units

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 94077

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Stuart Mace

Representation Summary:

The authorities should look at current occupancy rates and available premises in the area and adjacent boroughs before committing to making more space available than is required.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 94597

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Stratford upon Avon Town Centre Strategic Partnership

Representation Summary:

n/a

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 94604

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Stratford upon Avon Town Centre Strategic Partnership

Representation Summary:

n/a

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 94624

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Rainier Developments Ltd

Agent: Turley

Representation Summary:

The policy may present limitations to achieving the desired outcomes. A wider range of allocated sites in the right place will deliver the employment floorspace needed.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 94790

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Caroline Jackson

Representation Summary:

N/A

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 94898

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Kineton Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Comments made against DPD 18 apply here equally

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 95929

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Paul Tesh

Representation Summary:

yes. Emphasis needs to be placed on protecting identified existing and future employment areas from housing development and encouraging low cost affordable premises for small/start up businesses. Start up business premises need to be a variety of sizes to allow choice and potential expansion and to encourage expanding businesses to stay in the locality and not force the workforce to have to commute too far.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 96027

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Andrew Marshall

Representation Summary:

Only if the developments do not interfere withe the landscape and character of the area. Additionally road infrastructure should be capable of supporting the development without creating issues in local settlements. For example Wellesbourne which has numerous traffic pinch points and is close to SG15, SG16 , the Airfield and the Warwick University site.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 96324

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Southam Town Council

Representation Summary:

Southam Town, District and County elected representatives support this Policy Direction.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 96525

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Shipston Town Council

Representation Summary:

Emphasis needs to be placed on protecting existing identified employment land allocation from other forms of development, i.e. preventing housebuilding on employment land.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 96706

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: John Dinnie

Representation Summary:

Prevent House building on employment land.