Showing comments and forms 31 to 60 of 79

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 93220

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Kim Salmon

Representation Summary:

Far better levels of Sustainability and utilisation of all levels of infrastructure. People generally want to live and work close to a town in terms of short travel distances, community and facilities.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 93456

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Wellesbourne and Walton Parish Council

Representation Summary:

In this draft policy, Wellesbourne is identified as a local centre. The document states on page 100 that it is considered to be adequate. This is in a list including Alcester, Shipston on Stour South. It cannot be said that we reflect the adequacy of those Local Centres. It would be interesting to see a criteria. The village is underprovided with retail provision.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 93897

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Beverley Comley

Representation Summary:

Due to reduction in retail the areas in each town should be reduced to a core area allowing those farther out to be returned to residential

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 94526

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Nadia Lycett

Representation Summary:

Agree with the approach

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 94599

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Stratford upon Avon Town Centre Strategic Partnership

Representation Summary:

Stratford upon Avon town town centre is not sufficiently recognised. Please see the
Partnership statement submitted.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 94870

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Stratford-upon-Avon Town Transport Group

Representation Summary:

Why is Stratford last in the hierarchy? Consider alphabetical order.

For Stratford, consider including the whole of Henley Street in Primary Shopping Area, particularly as the Gateway Project comes forward.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 94908

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Kineton Parish Council

Representation Summary:

no further comment

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 94991

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Darren Downes

Representation Summary:

With ref to the Bearly/Wilmcote development - This is in conflict with the extremely limited area given over to Stratford's primary shopping area, which is clearly too small to accommodate the huge increase in population that would look to use it. Therefore these people travel to Leamington or Redditch to shop. So put the developments there to minimise environmental impact.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 95148

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Susan Frawley

Representation Summary:

N/A

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 95843

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr David Carter

Representation Summary:

The importance of protecting and enhancing town centres as service and leisure destinations for the whole area is supported. This should include a presumption against any further large out of town retail sites. The existing out of town sites generate traffic congestion both on and off site.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 95932

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Paul Tesh

Representation Summary:

yes. Is there further scope to encourage new and existing shops through the business rate system to make opening and keeping open shops more attractive?

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 96008

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Andrew Marshall

Representation Summary:

I support.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 96326

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Southam Town Council

Representation Summary:

Southam Town, District and County elected representatives support this Policy Direction.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 96523

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Shipston Town Council

Representation Summary:

A major project has been proposed and researched by consultants Atkins: Shaping Travel in Shipston.
No mention of this project to change a town centre could be located in the South Warwickshire Local Plan - Part 1.
There is further scope to encourage new and existing shops through the business rate system to make opening and keeping open shops more attractive.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 96723

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: John Dinnie

Representation Summary:

Please look at the business rate system to encourage small retailers to keep their shops open and to make town centres attractive to businesses.
Please take note of the proposals for Shipston Town Centre included in the document 'Shaping Travel in Shipston' attached here as the submission appears to be in parts and the reviewer of one part may not look at another.
Please also consider ways to encourage the Care sector which is a major part of the local economy in South Warwickshire

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 96725

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs G Wood

Representation Summary:

Town Centres have shown signs of serious decline for a variety of reasons. Town Centre shopping & leisure is important for mental health and therefore deserves serious investment.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 96914

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Margaret Jeffery

Representation Summary:

N/A

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 96925

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Alcester Town Council

Representation Summary:

Alcester Town Council, Arrow with Weethley Parish Council, Kinwarton Parish Council, Wixford Parish Council and Great Alne Parish Council (together referred to as Alcester Parishes Group or ‘APG’) supports this approach.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 97093

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Victoria Alcock

Representation Summary:

Town Centres need investment to lower rates and to support new start ups.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 97154

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Tysoe Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Yes

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 97730

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Gary Jeffery

Representation Summary:

N/A

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 98846

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Roger Shimmin

Representation Summary:

The centre of shipston is restricted by lack of parking and excess traffic and is not suitable for any expansion proposals

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 99350

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Garry Rollason

Representation Summary:

The policy should be more specific about the proportion of charity shops, barber shops and beauty related units in a primary shopping area and local centre. A lower proportion of such units should be specified for local centres.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 99545

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Diane Wilson

Representation Summary:

X

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 99575

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Afolabi Okeshola

Representation Summary:

N/A

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 99779

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Stratford District Council Green Group

Representation Summary:

Yes, each centre should be helped to have a town centre strategy.
There should be tax breaks for independent businesses who fit into this strategy.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 100337

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Lorraine Grocott

Representation Summary:

NA

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 100472

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Geoff Cooper

Representation Summary:

Local Councils have not done a very good job so far. For example, look at the state of the main shopping streets in Leamington. Contractors employed to replace pavements some years ago, (the disruption causing substantial loss of trade to local businesses), were awful. Almost immediately the resurfaced areas failed resulting in trip hazards and deep puddles. Leamington Town Council blamed WDC but neither did anything about it. High Street traders in general are suffering right now but locally they are hampered by the run down appearance of the streets and parking meters that are out of action.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 100516

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Michael Burgess

Representation Summary:

The proposals for supporting our town centres amount to little more than fiddling while Rome burns.

Yoga classes and dog training classes are not going to save our town centres that have been decimated by years of misguided polices. High rents, absurdly high business rates, increased parking restrictions and charges and ill thought through planning policies have resulted in the displacement of town centre shops and businesses to barren retail parks on the outskirts.

There needs to be an immediate halt to out of town developments and real incentives to encourage businesses to set up in the town centres.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 101214

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Dr Chris Clews

Representation Summary:

Vital opening question: do they need to change.
Secondly, why?
And thirdly just who decides what is changed and what it becomes?
Heritage must be respected - nowhere has as far as I am aware open gutters flowing with sewage (sorry!).