Yes

Representation ID: 86101

Received: 12/01/2025

Respondent: Sandy McCaskie

N/A

Yes

Representation ID: 86475

Received: 26/01/2025

Respondent: Mrs vivien bryer

I think it is essential that these proposals are put into practice. There is a climate emergency.

Yes

Representation ID: 86684

Received: 29/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Peter Bridgewater

Newt Zero Carbon is the most important part of the South Warwickshire Local Plan. It should take priority over all other considerations.

No

Representation ID: 86932

Received: 31/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Arthur Hogan-Fleming

-

Yes

Representation ID: 87080

Received: 03/02/2025

Respondent: S Gardner

However, I suggest that the council needs to do more in the development of knowledge and understanding of developers, as well as hold them to account in the designs.

Yes

Representation ID: 87412

Received: 08/02/2025

Respondent: Cllr Andrew Day

None

Yes

Representation ID: 87965

Received: 13/02/2025

Respondent: Miss Rose Llewellyn

very important!

Yes

Representation ID: 88430

Received: 15/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Maurice Stokes

Climate change is only going to get worse and any figure used in any calculation is likely to be unreliable. Investment to deal with climate change pushes any option into being unviable and therefore never included leaving the customer out of pocket and the developer in profit.

Yes

Representation ID: 89071

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Stratford upon Avon District Council

with the caveats I have written

Yes

Representation ID: 89482

Received: 20/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sidney Syson

No further comments

Yes

Representation ID: 89757

Received: 21/02/2025

Respondent: Compton Verney

n/a

Other

Representation ID: 91186

Received: 25/02/2025

Respondent: Radford Semele Parish Council

Radford Semele Parish Council urges the District Councils to insist that all new builds install
rooftop PV generation so as to deliver the renewable energy requirements in the most cost
effective and environmentally sustainable way.
The criteria for the consideration of solar farms and wind farms should be amended so that
there is a greater emphasis on the consideration of visual and landscape harms, the
protection of productive agricultural land and the social and amenity value of open spaces
and footpaths.’

Yes

Representation ID: 91330

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Transport for West Midlands

We welcome the comments relating to housing, however we would like to see more reference to how future climate resilience and what adaptive measures could be considered for both new and existing transport system infrastructure.

Yes

Representation ID: 91685

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Geoff Norman

Sensible

Other

Representation ID: 92278

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: SolStar Power Limited

Agent: Enzygo

No further comments to what is provided under Draft Policy D.

Also, no comments for Draft Policy E-K and Draft Policy Direction 22-24.

Other

Representation ID: 92630

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Bex Thomson

Not if it involves green belt

Yes

Representation ID: 92669

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Paul Fairburn

Answers already given under smaller headings.

Yes

Representation ID: 93005

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Alison Blake

Broadly speaking the plan seems to be giving importance to future needs

Yes

Representation ID: 93149

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Dr Penny Gray

Yes, broadly support all proposals in line with comments made on individual sections.

Yes

Representation ID: 93193

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Michael Checkley

Fully support these proposals

Yes

Representation ID: 93700

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Cllr David Armstrong

Yes, in particular I support the aim for Net Zero in operation to be a requirement. Reaching the best practices outlined in the chapter will require robust, independent viability assessments, to avoid the more ambitious targets being dropped in practice.

Yes

Representation ID: 95012

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Kineton Parish Council

Broadly yes but detailed comments should be taken into account.
The text for Draft Policy K appears to be incomplete.
There are long term concerns about SuDS, already mentioned but not yet addressed. This concerns long term responsibility for maintenance and liability where the scheme is part of public open spaces, usually including children’s play areas. Developers should be required to post a financial guarantee (bearing in mind they may have avoided significant capital outlay for Public Utility reinforcement) which can be drawn down in the future (regardless of the developer’s commercial and financial existence) for any major repair

No

Representation ID: 95746

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Bloor Homes Western

Agent: Marrons

The thrust of this chapter, which aims for climate resilience and zero carbon in the plan area is in line with national policy and targets. Some of the figures and requirements, however, along with the wording of some of the policies are considered to be unsound, as set out in the above responses. In particular some policies will need to be evidenced for feasibility, and all will need to be viability tested

Yes

Representation ID: 95818

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Shelagh Marshall

I support but once again stress the importance of not blighting areas with ground mounted solar pv simply because of grid capacity or other factors. The whole area of South Warwickshire is our heritage, save the earth but not at the expense of great swathes of industrial scale blue black panels. that is not a result.

Other

Representation ID: 95878

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr David Carter

All new builds should be required to install rooftop PV generation in order to meet renewable energy requirements in the most cost effective and environmentally friendly way.
The criteria for the consideration of solar farms and wind farms should be amended so that there is a greater emphasis on the consideration of visual and landscape harms, the protection of productive grade 3b agricultural land and the social and amenity value of open spaces and footpaths

Yes

Representation ID: 95946

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Paul Tesh

Yes with the exception of sections 7.3, 7.4, 7.9, 7.10 and 7.11 which it is considered could be strengthened as commented on each section to protect existing development.

Yes

Representation ID: 96341

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Southam Town Council

Southam Town, District and County elected representatives generally support this chapter.

Yes

Representation ID: 96551

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Shipston Town Council

Yes with the exception of sections 7.3, 7.4, 7.9, 7.10 and 7.11 which it is considered could be strengthened as commented on each section to protect existing development

Yes

Representation ID: 96992

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Margaret Jeffery

N/A

Yes

Representation ID: 96996

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: John Dinnie

Please note the comments requiring the flood prevention measures to be strengthened.