Yes

Representation ID: 86092

Received: 12/01/2025

Respondent: Sandy McCaskie

N/A

Yes

Representation ID: 86371

Received: 22/01/2025

Respondent: Ms May Lau

N/A

Yes

Representation ID: 86466

Received: 26/01/2025

Respondent: Mrs vivien bryer

We need renewable energy and we need food security. They can go hand-in-hand.

Yes

Representation ID: 86672

Received: 29/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Peter Bridgewater

This is a positive assumption that existing large scale renewable energy infrastructure is a public good, above most other considerations.

No

Representation ID: 86923

Received: 31/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Arthur Hogan-Fleming

Renewable energy will not provide what we need.

Yes

Representation ID: 87025

Received: 02/02/2025

Respondent: S Gardner

Yes

Yes

Representation ID: 87402

Received: 08/02/2025

Respondent: Cllr Andrew Day

None

Yes

Representation ID: 87582

Received: 09/02/2025

Respondent: mrs susan morris

I agree

Yes

Representation ID: 88705

Received: 17/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Ida Marjorie Brown

Agree in principle but i refer back to Draft Policy D for comments on renewables.

Yes

Representation ID: 88828

Received: 18/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sidney Syson

No further comment

Yes

Representation ID: 89054

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Stratford upon Avon District Council

i agree

Yes

Representation ID: 89261

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Jon Knight

It is vital that we protect what renewable resources we do already have.

Yes

Representation ID: 89314

Received: 20/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Julie Hudson

This comment is also relevant to the previous question. (It occurred to me as I registered for the Low Carbon Agriculture Conference 2025.) “PROTECTION” must include having the right mind set in companies delivering renewable energy infrastructure. A CIC company is more likely to have that than a City-driven investor firm. Protection must include long run resilience in ownership / operation, and this includes getting the governance right. It might be necessary to assess for ex post regulation of existing structures. Unfortunately, the financing structure of existing structures may not always have been designed with long run protection in mind.

No

Representation ID: 90066

Received: 22/02/2025

Respondent: Catherine Hewson

• Very uninspiring.
• Considerable scope for local community initiatives to contribute to address energy security and high costs.

Yes

Representation ID: 90417

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Chris Tagg

Renewable energy is vital and should not be interrupted

Yes

Representation ID: 91669

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Geoff Norman

Sensible

Other

Representation ID: 91762

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Joanne Taylor

Should alos include should not negatively impact on local ecology

Yes

Representation ID: 92461

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Julian Brown

.

Other

Representation ID: 92961

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Alison Blake

I don't understand this

Yes

Representation ID: 93222

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Steven Coulsting

I agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy-E- Protecting Large Scale Existing Renewable Energy Infrastructure

Yes

Representation ID: 93639

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Cllr David Armstrong

I agree with the draft policy.

Yes

Representation ID: 94958

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Kineton Parish Council

no further comment

Yes

Representation ID: 95936

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Paul Tesh

Yes

Yes

Representation ID: 96114

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Jonathan Horsfield

Important especially as regards wind power.

Yes

Representation ID: 96331

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Southam Town Council

Southam Town, District and County elected representatives support this draft Policy.

Yes

Representation ID: 96561

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Shipston Town Council

Agree

Yes

Representation ID: 96760

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: John Dinnie

Yes

Yes

Representation ID: 96972

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Alcester Town Council

This is agreed by Alcester Town Council, Arrow with Weethley Parish Council, Kinwarton Parish Council, Wixford Parish Council and Great Alne Parish Council (together referred to as Alcester Parishes Group or ‘APG’).

Yes

Representation ID: 97161

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Tysoe Parish Council

Yes

Yes

Representation ID: 97337

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Peter Lewin

It seeks to ensure the maximum levels of generation of renewable energy.