Yes

Representation ID: 86097

Received: 12/01/2025

Respondent: Sandy McCaskie

N/A

Yes

Representation ID: 86470

Received: 26/01/2025

Respondent: Mrs vivien bryer

Very thorough proposals.

Yes

Representation ID: 86677

Received: 29/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Peter Bridgewater

Adapting to Climate Crisis will also support reducing global warming.

No

Representation ID: 86927

Received: 31/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Arthur Hogan-Fleming

More unmaintainable buildings are not the solution

Other

Representation ID: 87075

Received: 03/02/2025

Respondent: S Gardner

There is limited demonstration of what this means - is this just the new build of the existing building too? How would this be achieved in older properties which may not accommodate these types of requirements.

Yes

Representation ID: 87407

Received: 08/02/2025

Respondent: Cllr Andrew Day

Does this also apply to heritage properties?

Yes

Representation ID: 87587

Received: 09/02/2025

Respondent: mrs susan morris

I agree

Other

Representation ID: 88455

Received: 15/02/2025

Respondent: Mr A Patrick

These requirements need to be consistent with the winter energy efficiency solutions. That probably means level 3 or 4 is required and with a defined air tightness.

Yes

Representation ID: 88715

Received: 17/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Ida Marjorie Brown

Agree

Yes

Representation ID: 89064

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Stratford upon Avon District Council

i agree

Yes

Representation ID: 89208

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Simon Durk

The cooling parts of this are particularly important. It would be disastrous if the installation of air conditioning to cope with higher temperatures became an acceptable standard in new houses.

Yes

Representation ID: 89268

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Jon Knight

Climate change is going to bring many challenges to us over the period of the SWLP, including extreme weather events, changing rainfall amounts/distributions and hotter summers. As such the draft policy would appear to be a self-evident good.

Yes

Representation ID: 89477

Received: 20/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sidney Syson

Presumably we can base out climate change checklist on Stratford's existing ones and improve if necessary.

Yes

Representation ID: 89665

Received: 21/02/2025

Respondent: Finham Brook Flood Action Group

none

Yes

Representation ID: 90421

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Chris Tagg

Passive should be the aim

Other

Representation ID: 90490

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Dr Louise Stewart

All proposals here are absolutely commendable although fatuous in the face of net 1.5c having already been exceeded and current policy in every first world country to continue exploring and use of fossil fuels. The proposed national focus in AI also has a significant energy resource, further compounding the challenge. However the key point here is that BW , as an area of strategic growth is proposed for land that already floods regularly. Therefore it cannot be seriously entertained as an appropriate site for construction of c7000 additional properties due to the lack of anywhere for appropriate run off.

Other

Representation ID: 91181

Received: 25/02/2025

Respondent: Radford Semele Parish Council

Radford Semele Parish Council supports the suggestions.

Yes

Representation ID: 91675

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Geoff Norman

Sensible

Other

Representation ID: 91773

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Joanne Taylor

I this fr all development - including self-build? Again this is a lot of work for self builders with one building vs developers, without any guidance etc.

Yes

Representation ID: 92468

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Julian Brown

Agree

No

Representation ID: 92596

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: The Planning Bureau Ltd

In order for the future plan to be found sound the following should be implemented:

• Any future policy should be stepped in line with emerging government targets and requirements and
• Ensure the policy is properly assessed within the forthcoming viability assessment

Yes

Representation ID: 92994

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Alison Blake

Makes sense

Yes

Representation ID: 93141

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Dr Penny Gray

All these initiatives are so important in reducing the impacts of the climate emergency locally and globally. Stratford will be more susceptible than many areas of the UK to flooding in particular, as it's located on a river, which is flooding with increasing frequency.

Yes

Representation ID: 93189

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Michael Checkley

I fully support the approach laid out in Draft Policy G

Yes

Representation ID: 93256

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Steven Coulsting

I agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy G- Climate Resilient Design. Next stpes should include required methodology, e.g. TM52, TM59 or Passivhaus, where not already sufficiently covered by the building regulations.

Other

Representation ID: 93463

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Wellesbourne and Walton Parish Council

The proposal to introduce a climate change checklist - having seen the current version of this in various planning applications it appears to be tokenistic so not much point unless it actually has an impact on planning decisions.

Yes

Representation ID: 93684

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Cllr David Armstrong

Yes, but each goal here is subjective and it is critical that more than 'consideration' is given to parts of the hierarchy. I would support stronger language, i.e. the hierarchy should be 'required' to be followed barring independent assessment, robust assessment of viability arguments demonstrating it cannot be. Specific guidelines should be given where possible to encourage good design.

Other

Representation ID: 93826

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Warwick District Green Party

Most of this is suitable. However, new buildings should have air tightness of <0.6 air changes per hour (see Draft Policy Direction-22) which necessitates mechanical ventilation with heat recovery.

Other

Representation ID: 94121

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Stuart Mace

Focus appears to be on a warming climate, but does not appear to have considered situations of a cooling climate where increased demand for heating would occur. Climate change is not just hotter weather, and the British Isles has always had variable weather conditions so a range of factors ought to be being considered. Where external provision is made e.g. for shade, then those developments ought to consider the future maintenance costs arising from plantations of trees, cleaning of shelters and flushing of SuDS systems to prevent infestations of mosquitoes in stagnant water.

Yes

Representation ID: 94989

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Kineton Parish Council

no further comment