Yes

Representation ID: 86103

Received: 12/01/2025

Respondent: Sandy McCaskie

N/A

No

Representation ID: 86304

Received: 20/01/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sarah Nash

Infra structure in C1 will not cope

Yes

Representation ID: 86686

Received: 29/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Peter Bridgewater

Appropriate.

No

Representation ID: 86933

Received: 31/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Arthur Hogan-Fleming

Need fewer people/control immigration, not more development

Yes

Representation ID: 87414

Received: 08/02/2025

Respondent: Cllr Andrew Day

None

Yes

Representation ID: 87593

Received: 09/02/2025

Respondent: mrs susan morris

I agree

Yes

Representation ID: 88833

Received: 18/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Ida Marjorie Brown

Agree

Other

Representation ID: 89201

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Wendy Bannerman

In designing development, movement through as well as between settlements should be protected, extended and improved. Developments with green infrastructure that are subject to residents paying a maintenance fee often exclude the wider public from walking, wheeling and riding through. Design should protect existing PROW, enhancing by making connections where the network is disjointed.

Yes

Representation ID: 89493

Received: 20/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sidney Syson

I would love to see a design code to ensure there are accessible letter boxes, not ones at ground level. I know the postal workers were asking for this years ago.

Yes

Representation ID: 90912

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Malcolm Fisk

I agree in principle but would like these developed by the 'SWLP Team' in isolation

Yes

Representation ID: 91190

Received: 25/02/2025

Respondent: Radford Semele Parish Council

Radford Semele Parish Council supports the suggestions.

Yes

Representation ID: 91690

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Geoff Norman

Sensible

Other

Representation ID: 92011

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Mr John Franklin

When finalising the strategic plan, the number of houses required should be categorised by size.ie numbers of 1, 2, 3 bedroom houses etc. This is essential to rebalance the housing stock, particularly in rural areas.

Yes

Representation ID: 92478

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Julian Brown

Agree

No

Representation ID: 92633

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Bex Thomson

Not if it involves green belt

Yes

Representation ID: 93009

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Alison Blake

I agree

Other

Representation ID: 93475

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Wellesbourne and Walton Parish Council

This says that production of settlement specific design codes will be led by Neighbourhood Planning Groups – is this the Parish Council and if so what support will we be given to do this should it be necessary? And will Parish Councils have authority to ensure compliance? There is also a to review the conservation area in Wellesbourne and Walton

Yes

Representation ID: 95218

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Kineton Parish Council

no further comment

No

Representation ID: 95307

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Alamo

Agent: Harris Lamb

producing design codes should not delay the ability to bring sites forward.

No

Representation ID: 95708

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: David Wilson Homes

Agent: Harris Lamb

The preparation of Design Codes should not delay the preparation and submission of planning applications. If a Design Code is in place planning applications should be prepared to be inconformity with its guidance. It should not, however, be necessary for developers to wait for Design Codes to be put in place before submitting planning applications or prior to their determination.

Yes

Representation ID: 95752

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Bloor Homes Western

Agent: Marrons

Draft Policy Direction 26 aligns with the NPPF, which encourages the use of design codes to provide clarity about design expectations. The policy’s commitment to a wide range of design codes, including area-wide, site-specific and densification design codes is strongly supported as it will help to deliver context-sensitive and locally appropriate design solutions.

While the policy correctly references the National Design Guide, it should also directly reference the National Model Design Code, which provides a framework for preparing local design codes. Including both will ensure the policy fully aligns with NPPF Paragraph 133 and national best practice.

Other

Representation ID: 95766

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Amanda Dyhouse

New housing needs to be better designed in South Warwickshire. Recent housing developments in the area have been very poor in design, clearly cheap and unlikely to stand the test of time.

Yes

Representation ID: 95948

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Paul Tesh

Yes

Yes

Representation ID: 96343

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Southam Town Council

Southam Town, District and County elected representatives support this policy direction and believe it should go further in stating that the current Stratford on Avon District Supplementary Planning Documents (SPDs) should be retained for the area-wide design codes other than where specific provisions therein are shown to be not applicable to the wider SWLP area.

Yes

Representation ID: 96550

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Shipston Town Council

Agree

Yes

Representation ID: 96585

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Peter Nixon

Individual sites need to be considered as unique

Yes

Representation ID: 97002

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: John Dinnie

To achieve the intentions of the 10 characteristics, Communities should be encouraged to apply the design codes to their existing neighbourhoods as well as in their planning process. They should then be enabled with appropriate financial assistance to implement those plans.

Yes

Representation ID: 97041

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Alcester Town Council

This approach is supported by Alcester Town Council, Arrow with Weethley Parish Council, Kinwarton Parish Council, Wixford Parish Council and Great Alne Parish Council (together referred to as Alcester Parishes Group or ‘APG’). Our preference is for Design Codes to be local to a settlement.

Yes

Representation ID: 97187

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Tysoe Parish Council

Yes

Yes

Representation ID: 97264

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Squab Hall Farm

Agent: Mr Jack Barnes

b. Draft Policy Direction 26 aligns with the NPPF, which encourages the use of design codes to provide clarity about design expectations. The policy’s commitment to a wide range of design codes, including area-wide, site-specific and densification design codes is strongly supported as it will help to deliver context-sensitive and locally appropriate design solutions.

While the policy correctly references the National Design Guide, it should also directly reference the National Model Design Code, which provides a framework for preparing local design codes. Including both will ensure the policy fully aligns with NPPF Paragraph 133 and national best practice.