Yes

Representation ID: 86009

Received: 11/01/2025

Respondent: Mrs Kate Harris

No comment

Yes

Representation ID: 86107

Received: 12/01/2025

Respondent: Sandy McCaskie

N/A

Yes

Representation ID: 86691

Received: 29/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Peter Bridgewater

The water pollution impacts of farming should be a material consideration..

No

Representation ID: 86937

Received: 31/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Arthur Hogan-Fleming

No more development = less pollution

Yes

Representation ID: 87087

Received: 03/02/2025

Respondent: S Gardner

Yes

Other

Representation ID: 87322

Received: 08/02/2025

Respondent: Matthew Wright

This proposal is not clear enough as to how the aims will be achieved. In reducing pollution for example, all development must be required to give priority to low-carbon forms of transport, meaning adequate footpaths, cycleways and bus routes. Development should also be structured locally to minimise the amount of travel people need to do in cars to meet their everyday needs (e.g. children able to walk to school within 20 minutes).

Yes

Representation ID: 87419

Received: 08/02/2025

Respondent: Cllr Andrew Day

None

Yes

Representation ID: 87596

Received: 09/02/2025

Respondent: mrs susan morris

I agree

No

Representation ID: 88373

Received: 15/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Ruth James

No consideration is being given to the cutting down of so many trees and removal of green fields. So many green areas have been removed and trees chopped down, for HS2 construction. It is APPALLING!

And NOW, more and more houses are being built on green development sites. Trees are being chopped down too.
How can you say that you are building a healthy pollution free environment to live in? Green spaces are the basis of healthy air and also mental health.

Yes

Representation ID: 88434

Received: 15/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Annette Pharo

The huge increased levels of air pollution from traffic if 6700 new homes are built at Wilmcote will not be in keeping with this policy as although there are train stations nearby, they are not suitable for development and are presently not a feasible transport choice as the routes are restricted. People moving into the area will be using cars.

Yes

Representation ID: 88435

Received: 15/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Maurice Stokes

The Bearley/Wilmcote site will cause more house hold waste, sewage pollution and road off into the local river. The topography of the land makes the site unviable for the site to get a sewer pipeline to the sewage works. A storm over flows will require and increased size of outfall under the railway line this is not viable as the levels are not suitable.

No

Representation ID: 88462

Received: 16/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Debbie Taylor

The houses are too densely populated in some sites creating light noise and car pollution.the ques of traffic already getting in and out of kenilworth at the jet garage are dreadful and cause traffic pollution.cars are backed up on Glasshouse Lane and pulling out from Farmwr ward Road is very difficult.We haven't got tbe road structure to support more cars through town

No

Representation ID: 88463

Received: 16/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Debbie Taylor

Over populated

Yes

Representation ID: 88838

Received: 18/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Ida Marjorie Brown

Agree

Yes

Representation ID: 89079

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Stratford upon Avon District Council

i agree

Yes

Representation ID: 89210

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Suzanna Hughes

Efforts should focus on preventing further air pollution in Stratford, where air quality is already a concern, by exploring settlement options outside the town to help alleviate the issue.

Yes

Representation ID: 89498

Received: 20/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sidney Syson

Yes. I do not think residential development should be allowed in areas with known high levels of air pollution

Yes

Representation ID: 89847

Received: 21/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Daphne Davis

Settlement options outside Stratford should be considered, as an increase of possibly 1400 extra cars on the already congested Birmingham Road, would be a real concern for the air quality due to extra pollution.

Yes

Representation ID: 89890

Received: 21/02/2025

Respondent: Dr Stephen Browett

Protecting the environment should be, in my opinion, the most important priority for the quality of life for the people and animals living in it.

Yes

Representation ID: 89913

Received: 21/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Holly Whittaker

I agree. We should avoid increasing air pollution in Stratford where air quality is already a concern, and consider settlement options outside of Stratford to relieve these air quality issues.

Yes

Representation ID: 90015

Received: 22/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Fiona Macvie

Air quality in Stratford upon Avon is already a cause for concern especially during anticyclonic conditions. Development outside the town would help to avoid exacerbating this problem.

Yes

Representation ID: 90247

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Maria Giblin

Re Sg18- and Stratford upon Avon we should reduce pollution not increase therefore a settlement further away would be better.

Yes

Representation ID: 90249

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Dean Giblin

To address air quality concerns in Stratford, it's important to avoid increasing air pollution and explore settlement options outside of Stratford to alleviate the issues. In particular, traffic on Birmingham Road is at a saturation point

Yes

Representation ID: 90441

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sheetal Tailor

Air quality is Stratford is a concern for it's residents. Therefore it is better for the health of the population to consider options outside of Stratford Upon Avon.

Other

Representation ID: 90510

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Dr Louise Stewart

The proposal to build an additional c7000 houses in Bearley and Wilmcote would cause significant pollution due to construction and resultant increased traffic. Poor road infrastructure and an unappealing public transport offer will drive people to use cars, damaging the environment and with serious proven adverse consequences of or the health and wellbeing of local residents.

Yes

Representation ID: 90552

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Gavin Simpson

All actions must be based on the maintenance and preservation of the environment for the future generations, its our duty and obligation to our parents and for-fathers.

Yes

Representation ID: 90680

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Martin Littlewood

N/A

Yes

Representation ID: 90737

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Tim Goodwin

We must avoid increasing air pollution in Stratford upon Avon where air quality is a concern and consider settlement options outside of Stratford to relieve the air quality and associated public health issues.

Yes

Representation ID: 90812

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Maria Sacristan

Should avoid increasing air pollution in Stratford

Yes

Representation ID: 90874

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Mr James Morris

To tackle air quality issues in Stratford, a comprehensive strategy is needed. This involves promoting public transport, cycling, and walking, while reducing fossil fuel use. Additionally, considering settlement options beyond Stratford’s boundaries can lower population density, easing pressure on resources and infrastructure. This approach not only mitigates pollution but also enhances community health and sustainability. By developing eco-friendly communities with green spaces and sustainable infrastructure, Stratford can foster a balanced living environment. Environmental education and awareness campaigns can further empower residents to make conscious choices, setting a precedent for addressing air quality challenges and improving quality of life.