Yes

Representation ID: 86108

Received: 12/01/2025

Respondent: Sandy McCaskie

N/A

Yes

Representation ID: 86692

Received: 29/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Peter Bridgewater

Be wary of developers providing mitigation or compensation for the harm they cause. Effective mitigation or compensation is expensive and it would be cheaper to avoid the harm through better design in the first place.

No

Representation ID: 86938

Received: 31/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Arthur Hogan-Fleming

More development would be damaging to health

Yes

Representation ID: 87088

Received: 03/02/2025

Respondent: S Gardner

Yes

Yes

Representation ID: 87420

Received: 08/02/2025

Respondent: Cllr Andrew Day

None

Yes

Representation ID: 87597

Received: 09/02/2025

Respondent: mrs susan morris

I agree

Yes

Representation ID: 88439

Received: 15/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Maurice Stokes

A HIA would clearly show the Bearley/Wilmcote site unsuitable for development. The site is isolated and remote from any other communal area, it could not achieve a sustain hub around which to grow and develop its own identity. The investment required to make the site to well connected making it viable is unrealistic as there is a railway line to the western boundary. British planning is littered with such estates becoming areas of deprivation, crime and antisocial behaviour. This site should not be considered!

No

Representation ID: 88464

Received: 16/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Debbie Taylor

Warwick hospital declared a critical incident as it couldn't cope with all the patients,A&E is dangerously under pressure with long waiting times causing death and decline in health,ambulances have life threatening waiting times,GPS don't have enough appointments to offer so patients health deteriorates. HOW on earth does the council think these essential services can cope with more houses.Care I the community is poor too.its a mess!Big investment is needed in these areas

Yes

Representation ID: 88839

Received: 18/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Ida Marjorie Brown

Agree

Yes

Representation ID: 89080

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Stratford upon Avon District Council

i agree

Yes

Representation ID: 89374

Received: 20/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Tim Twynam

yes in principle agree

Other

Representation ID: 89499

Received: 20/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sidney Syson

Surely if developments have a significant negative impact on health and wellbeing they should not be allowed. How can you compensate?

Yes

Representation ID: 91196

Received: 25/02/2025

Respondent: Radford Semele Parish Council

Radford Semele Parish Council supports the suggestions.

Yes

Representation ID: 91475

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Michelle Mendoza

In Ufton village we suffer greatly from flies during the majority of the year which arrive from the local landfill site. I, along with many other villagers, are unable to open their windows or doors in warmer weather due to the influx of flies. The quality of daily life is therefore greatly reduced. Inevitably many flies will still get into the house, and land on food in the process of being prepared.
.

The potential housing site of F1 would also be affected by the same landfill site, so it is vital this issue is addressed.

Yes

Representation ID: 91561

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Maxine Mayer

HIA's should be mandated - this aspect is critical to health and well being and should be the starting point for ALL development

Yes

Representation ID: 91695

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Geoff Norman

Sensible

Other

Representation ID: 91782

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Joanne Taylor

The carbon emissions from major development should also be conseidered along side these factors as they will impact health

Yes

Representation ID: 92482

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Julian Brown

Agree

No

Representation ID: 92605

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: The Planning Bureau Ltd

For the plan to be in line with national policy and effective the following wording should be added to para 2 of the policy to recognise the health benefits of older persons housing.


Specialist Housing for older people has a number of health benefits and proposals for such schemes will not be required to submit a Health Impact Assessment

No

Representation ID: 92638

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Bex Thomson

Don’t agree with any major development

Yes

Representation ID: 93022

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Alison Blake

Absolutely

Yes

Representation ID: 93387

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mr David Haggarty

N/A

Yes

Representation ID: 93805

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mr William Campbell

Strongly agree

No

Representation ID: 93957

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Carina Taylor

South Warwickshire-Alcester
Already it is difficult to get a doctors appointment, not enough dentists, not enough leisure facilities this impacts on health.
Long way to travel to Warwick Hospital or for specialist cancer treatment in Coventry

Yes

Representation ID: 93992

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sue Scurrah

-

Yes

Representation ID: 95040

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Lynette Sutton

Essential this is carried out and must reduce health impact.
Some developments should be reconsidered in light of the impact on residents health

Yes

Representation ID: 95224

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Kineton Parish Council

no further comment

No

Representation ID: 95761

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Bloor Homes Western

Agent: Marrons

Housing and mixed-use schemes naturally contribute to improved community welfare by delivering high-quality homes, green spaces, and social infrastructure. Existing environmental health regulations, national space standards, and policies on sustainability and renewable energy already provide safeguards for health considerations within the planning process. The policy could better recognise the inherent health benefits of well-designed housing schemes, which provide safe, sustainable, and high-quality living environments.

Yes

Representation ID: 95775

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Amanda Dyhouse

N/A

Other

Representation ID: 95954

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Paul Tesh

Yes, however a definition of what constitutes a 'major development' that triggers a health Impact Assessment Screening report should be included