Yes

Representation ID: 86123

Received: 12/01/2025

Respondent: Sandy McCaskie

N/A

No

Representation ID: 86944

Received: 31/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Arthur Hogan-Fleming

-

No

Representation ID: 87094

Received: 03/02/2025

Respondent: S Gardner

This section doesn’t go far enough… and the role of the cancel is not fully clear.

Yes

Representation ID: 87133

Received: 04/02/2025

Respondent: Jonathan Devereux

From 1998-2019 I commuted with a fold up bike from Farringdon or West Hampstead to offices around London. My journey's were better provided for in terms of cycle lanes than anything I've experienced in Stratford upon Avon where there are no cycle routes worthy of the name. Safer to travel from Great Dover Street in Borough to Marylebone than try to traverse West - East across Stratford upon Avon. On road routes are too narrow for a cyclist to cycle correctly unless on the dotted line on Banbury Road. Birmingham and Alcester Road routes incomplete and faded to nothing.

Yes

Representation ID: 87427

Received: 08/02/2025

Respondent: Cllr Andrew Day

None

Yes

Representation ID: 89089

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Stratford upon Avon District Council

i agree

Yes

Representation ID: 89277

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Jon Knight

This chapter seems pretty well thought out and consistent.

No

Representation ID: 89305

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Rebecca Mitchell

As a rural area the needs of pedestrians and cyclists are overlooked. Southam is surrounded by busy A roads and a ring road which you have to take your life in your hands to cross. There is no pedestrian or cycleway from Stockton to Southam. All of these plans focus on active transport within towns yet little thought is given to intra village transport.

Yes

Representation ID: 89360

Received: 20/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Simon Durk

More buses, more bicycles more EVs

No

Representation ID: 89458

Received: 20/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Thomas Jackson

Current traffic situation (especially Stratford) need to be far better resolved before further settlement plans are agreed

Yes

Representation ID: 89761

Received: 21/02/2025

Respondent: Compton Verney

n/a

Yes

Representation ID: 89783

Received: 21/02/2025

Respondent: Susana Pais

It has been proven that smart city inhabitants and users reap benefits eg Edinburgh and therefore there should be an objective of moving towards smart city infrastructure

Yes

Representation ID: 91548

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sidney Syson

No further comments

Yes

Representation ID: 91706

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Geoff Norman

Sensible

No

Representation ID: 92649

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Bex Thomson

Not if it involves green belt

Yes

Representation ID: 93032

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Alison Blake

Even rural communities need good connections nowadays

Yes

Representation ID: 93734

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Dr Penny Gray

With the proviso that, as per my comment on the introductory paragraphs, the proposals refer to the 'climate crisis' and/or 'climate emergency' rather than 'climate change' and give priority to climate impact mitigation measures.

Yes

Representation ID: 94894

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Stratford-upon-Avon Town Transport Group

Yes

No

Representation ID: 95016

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Darren Downes

Wilmcote / Bearly proposal - will not lead to more efficient infrastructure and will INCREASE traffic movements.

Yes

Representation ID: 95234

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Kineton Parish Council

Subject to the comments against specific DPDs being addressed

Yes

Representation ID: 95962

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Paul Tesh

yes

Yes

Representation ID: 96356

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Southam Town Council

Southam Town, District and County elected representatives broadly support these proposals.

Other

Representation ID: 96411

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Dr Penny Gray

This section needs a lot more work, along the lines of that which has gone into Chapter 7. It's currently inconsistent with the council's net zero strategy, which must take priority. It should not be countenancing building new roads. It should instead be supporting public transport, including rail as required, cycle networks, and multimodal hubs, along with pedestrianisation.

Yes

Representation ID: 96543

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Shipston Town Council

yes

Other

Representation ID: 96877

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Margaret Jeffery

Yet again, am idealistic vision which could not easily be put into practice.

Yes

Representation ID: 97068

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Alcester Town Council

Alcester Town Council, Arrow with Weethley Parish Council, Kinwarton Parish Council, Wixford Parish Council and Great Alne Parish Council (together referred to as Alcester Parishes Group or ‘APG’) broadly supports the proposals in this Chapter. Investment in public transport is essential particularly in bus services connecting our communities with each other and nearby towns and cities.
Digital connectivity must be prioritized for all communities to support business and remote working.
Parking and traffic management strategies are required to improve congestion in town centres.

Yes

Representation ID: 97092

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: John Dinnie

I am in agreement with Policy Directions 31 - 35. There is a specific report that applies to Shipston which could inform either the SWLP or any subsequent updating of the Shipston on Stour Neighbourhood Development Plan. This would apply without any additional development identified in SG17.

No

Representation ID: 97546

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mr HUGH KEEP

I do believe we should strongly resist the continued desire to build ever more roads. Road building should be the last option and only if no other more sustainable transport is possible.

Other

Representation ID: 97837

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Gary Jeffery

N/A

Other

Representation ID: 97902

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Brenda Stewart

It worries me that the though the approach to sustainable travel is good, the Road Lobby has been so powerful and sucessful for decades that it still seems a foregone conclusion that large amounts of money should be directed, without enough thought, into building new roads, with all the attendant destruction of the environment and incresed air pollution.