Other

Representation ID: 102142

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Grevayne Properties Limited

Agent: The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

It is agreed that development should aim to be accessible by sustainable transport, but in a District containing a large number of rural settlements, this is not always possible. Flexibility should be introduced to require sustainable transport accessibility wherever possible.

Our client considers that it is no longer appropriate to rely solely upon surveys of the physical infrastructure, such as access to transport. Alongside, it is appropriate to also consider the social, economic and environmental benefits for sustainable development of the burgeoning trends in rolling out carbon efficient technologies into rural areas and trends in home working and behavioural patterns.

Yes

Representation ID: 102147

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Joseph Dimambro-Denson

I agree here, but we also need to acknowledge the design and layout of our streets affect active travel, it goes beyond just having cycle lanes and parking, it's about permeability for active modes and public transport.

Yes

Representation ID: 102168

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Andrew Crump

This is a key sustainability issue for Meon Vale and Long Marston Airfield. There is no adequate transport infrastructure for either site at present. Car dependency will continue until such time as there are adequate means of alternative travel to and from work and for other purposes. Bus services are infrequent and there are railway stations at Stratford and Honeybourne, both of which are around six miles distant and which require access by car. It is not surprising that there is no integrated transport system in such a rural location. That is part of its charm.

Yes

Representation ID: 102190

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Hallam Land

Agent: LRM Planning

We agree with the emphasis on promoting sustainable travel. Consistent with the intention of the NPPF, land allocations should be located so as to contribute to a sustainable pattern of development. This ensures that development is focused on locations that are or can be made sustainable, through limiting the need to travel and offering a genuine choice of transport modes. The integration of land use and transport is therefore critical to the achievement of the objectives of this policy; this is grounded first in the location of new land allocations.

Yes

Representation ID: 102340

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: IM Land 1 Limited

Agent: Turley

IM Land agrees with Draft Policy Direction 31 in respect of the land off Rumsbush Road.

Yes

Representation ID: 102369

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Richborough

Agent: Marrons

The Council’s approach to sustainable transport and accessibility is supported. The requirement that development proposals must prioritise access to public transport, walking and cycling routes is critical to ensuring that the spatial pattern of development is sustainable. South Warwickshire remains a relatively rural district with a dispersed pattern of development, the aim of reducing car dependency may negatively affect those with reduced mobility and lower incomes within less well-connected areas. An option that encourages growth in locations that have greater access to more sustainable forms of transport would be supported.

Other

Representation ID: 102371

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Philip Alton

Recent history shows that transport issues have become worse, some of which is due to the actions of the Council. These include road congestion due to incorrect scalke of residential developments, traffic "improvements" (Stanks Island, Tachbrook Park), the termnination of the scheduled bus service to Hatton Park and the reduced train services to Hatton Station. These have all occurred on the Council's watch so, understandably, residents are sceptical about the Council's ability to deliver on this approach.

Other

Representation ID: 102394

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Taylor Wimpey Strategic Land

Agent: Turley

The Draft Policy Direction is supported in principle. However, the policy should provide clarity on what “access for all” comprises, including possible examples, to give clarity to applicants and decision makers.

Other

Representation ID: 102395

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: BDW Trading Limited

Agent: Knight Frank LLP

The policy should prioritise development proposals with access to public transport, walking, and cycling routes, aligning with the NPPF, to reduce travel needs and promote sustainable modes of transport. The policy could be expanded to support sites with existing sustainable transport links, such as the site at Cophams Hill and its proximity to a railway station, particularly where reduced car dependency can be achieved.

Yes

Representation ID: 102432

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Hill Residential

Agent: Turley

Yes. Hill Residential fully supports Draft Policy Direction 31 and considers that ‘Hatton Villages’ can be an exemplary development achieving each objective of the policy.

Yes

Representation ID: 102510

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: IM Land 1 Limited

Agent: Turley

IM Land agrees with Draft Policy Direction 31. The land off Rumbush Lane is in a sustainable location approximately 8km to the southwest of Solihull Town Centre, approximately 10.9km to the northeast of Redditch and approximately 30km to the northwest of Stratford-Upon-Avon.

Other

Representation ID: 102652

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Hatton Parish Council

The intention is not contestable
There is however no evidence of any willingness to move from independent motorised transport unless it is made completely impracticable, ie as in large metropolitan districts.
'Active Travel' does not happen. The number of cycles in the storage facility at Warwick Parkway station has not been seen to exceed 10. Existing cycle lanes and paths are little used, and the roads, especially in the towns of Warwick District are chronically congested
The proximity of site B1 next Hatton Station would not meaningfully reduce motor car usage.

Yes

Representation ID: 102869

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Turley

The University of Warwick supports the principle of this policy direction, but recommends further consideration be given to certain elements. Greater reference should be given to emerging technologies. Greater emphasis on connectivity should be considered at strategic and local level.

Other

Representation ID: 102901

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Summers Holdings Ltd

Agent: The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

Development should aim to be accessible by sustainable transport, but with a large number of rural settlements, this is not always possible; flexibility should be introduced.

It is no longer appropriate to rely solely upon surveys of physical infrastructure. Instead, the social, economic and environmental benefits for sustainable development of the burgeoning trends in rolling out carbon efficient technologies into rural areas and trends in work and behavioural patterns should be considered, including reliance on the Internet for social, community, entertainment and other services, as well as for work. Tanworth In Arden currently benefits from access to Ultrafast broadband.

Yes

Representation ID: 102950

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr David Bailey

Sustainable transport must be given very high priority, it will bring multiple benefits.

No

Representation ID: 103090

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Propernomics Ltd

The policy should reflect the fact that rural communities will continue to depend upon private transport. Many desirable developments, especially small, non-strategic sites and plots will not be able to subsidise public transport or provide infrastructure to the extent envisaged by the draft policy. Hence the reference to "all" new developments and proposals should be modified so as not to discriminate against small sites and rural locations.

Yes

Representation ID: 103102

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Bloor Homes

Agent: Marrons

The Council’s approach to sustainable transport and accessibility is supported. The requirement that development proposals must prioritise access to public transport, walking and cycling routes is critical to ensuring that the spatial pattern of development is sustainable. South Warwickshire remains a relatively rural district with a dispersed pattern of development, the aim of reducing car dependency may negatively affect those with reduced mobility and lower incomes within less well-connected areas. An option that encourages growth in locations that have greater access to more sustainable forms of transport would be supported.

Other

Representation ID: 103144

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Andrew Close

I’m slightly surprised given the importance stated in the SWLP vision and growth strategy - that transport is a priority for the sustainable development policy options that have been selected so far - that this chapter is not more prominent. This policy doesn’t have a spatial dimension. How might it impact (positively) on the choice of housing-led strategic sites and planned communities/New Towns? Reviewing the interim SA conclusions should also be undertaken.

Yes

Representation ID: 103337

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Jenny Stevens

We need planning for better transport to improve sustainability and reduce the pollution

Other

Representation ID: 103409

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Summers Family

Agent: The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

Development should aim to be accessible by sustainable transport, but with large numbers of rural settlements, this is not always possible. Flexibility should be introduced to require sustainable transport accessibility wherever possible.

It is no longer appropriate to rely solely upon surveys of the physical infrastructure, such as access to transport, albeit that Site 518 is close to Wootton Wawen and transport facilities therein. It is instead appropriate to also consider the social, economic and environmental benefits for sustainable development of the burgeoning trends in rolling out carbon efficient technologies into rural areas and trends in work and behavioural patterns.

Other

Representation ID: 103582

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Richborough - Salford Road, Bidford-on-Avon

Agent: Turley

Richborough consider that further details are required on what “access for all” comprises, including possible examples, to give clarity to applicants and decision makers.

Other

Representation ID: 103583

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Richborough - Gaydon Road, Bishop's Itchington

Agent: Turley

Richborough consider that further details are required on what “access for all” comprises, including possible examples, to give clarity to applicants and decision makers.

Other

Representation ID: 103584

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Richborough - Lighthorne Road, Kineton

Agent: Turley

Richborough consider that further details are required on what “access for all” comprises, including possible examples, to give clarity to applicants and decision makers.

Other

Representation ID: 103586

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Richborough - Sycamore Close, Stockton

Agent: Turley

Richborough consider that further details are required on what “access for all” comprises, including possible examples, to give clarity to applicants and decision makers.

Other

Representation ID: 103587

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Richborough - Kineton Road, Wellesbourne

Agent: Turley

Richborough consider that further details are required on what “access for all” comprises, including possible examples, to give clarity to applicants and decision makers.

Other

Representation ID: 103588

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Richborough - Wellesbourne Road, Wellesbourne

Agent: Turley

Richborough consider that further details are required on what “access for all” comprises, including possible examples, to give clarity to applicants and decision makers.

Other

Representation ID: 103591

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Richborough - Plough Lane, Bishop's Itchington

Agent: Turley

Richborough consider that further details are required on what “access for all” comprises, including possible examples, to give clarity to applicants and decision makers.

Yes

Representation ID: 103833

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Claire Jones

Support anything that reduces car use and encourages use of public transport

Yes

Representation ID: 103935

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Amarjit Gill

Rather than putting extra pressure on existing roads in Stratford, we should look at areas with more sustainable access such as good rail links

Other

Representation ID: 104061

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Andrew Newbould

While I agree with the overriding principles I think to make any significant reduction in car ownership will not be realistic.
With the increase in electric vehicles the carbon impact will not be as significant as for internal combustion engines and the flexibility of smaller vehicles should also be considered. There is no mention here of autonomous vehicles which, with time, will most likely form a significant part of public transport