Yes

Representation ID: 93473

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Vivien Haggarty

N/A

Yes

Representation ID: 93474

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mr G Wyatt

Unfortunately these protections do not include very local (small sites) which offer 'staging posts' for organisms, nor locally important routes used as daily methods of locomotion to foraging sited, etc.
E.g. I observed 2 hares trying to use their normal route, but a new fencw had been erected. They kept trying to get through, but were stymied and after about 20 mins both were left crouching, unable to continue on their daily route. We have far fewer hares now, though how far this is due to this single intervention is not determined.

Yes

Representation ID: 93595

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mr JAMES STEWART

I agree with this policy as it prioritizes and enhances existing biodiversity. The area is already thriving with well-established wildlife corridors and rich habitats, which should be protected and strengthened. Rather than disrupting nature, we should focus on supporting and expanding these ecosystems to ensure long-term sustainability. By safeguarding these natural spaces, we can promote biodiversity, protect wildlife, and maintain ecological balance. This policy takes the right approach by recognizing the value of existing habitats and ensuring they continue to thrive for future generations.

Yes

Representation ID: 93675

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Claire STEWART

I support this policy as it focuses on protecting and enhancing existing biodiversity. The area already has thriving wildlife corridors and well-established habitats that should be preserved and strengthened. Rather than disrupting these ecosystems, efforts should be made to support and expand them for long-term sustainability. Safeguarding natural spaces helps maintain ecological balance, protect wildlife, and promote biodiversity. This policy takes the right approach by valuing existing habitats and ensuring they continue to flourish for future generations.

Yes

Representation ID: 93713

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Cllr David Armstrong

Yes. I strongly support the principles of the Lawton Report being mandatory, with no offsetting being allowed.

Yes

Representation ID: 93763

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mr George Power

Yes. Given the changing climate it is critically important to do everything in our power to protect our local habitats and wildlife species. It isn't just physical damage from incorrectly sited new build estates, it's also light and noise pollution too that must be considered.

Yes

Representation ID: 93807

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mr William Campbell

Strongly agree

Yes

Representation ID: 93830

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Warwick District Green Party

Yes. The mandate to protect, conserve and enhance must be non-negotiable and in no circumstances should offsetting be allowed. The importance of protected sites for natural flood management where appropriate should be highlighted, cross-referenced to draft Policy J in chapter 7 on flood risks. A green / blue map identifying all existing sites, options for new sites and connectivity should form part of the plan. For example, Finham Brook in Kenilworth from upstream of the castle across Kenilworth down to the wetland area to be created under the HS2 bridge over the Brook.

Yes

Representation ID: 93860

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Zbigniew Franczuk

Wildlife s in Clopton Quarter untill the should be protected as where will it go as developers do not care as it is not in their backyard and there is no profit for them

Yes

Representation ID: 93919

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Beverley Comley

Wildlife corridors between areas must be protected

Yes

Representation ID: 93965

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Carina Taylor

More sites should be identified.

Yes

Representation ID: 93991

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sue Scurrah

-

Yes

Representation ID: 94109

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Holly Whittaker

I agree with the draft policy regarding Protection of Sites, Habitats and Species. However, I am concerned at the lack of detail contained within this policy about such an important issue, and believe this should be expanded upon further.

We need to protect important wildlife corridors connected to nature reserves and vital wildlife site areas. This includes protecting them from the damage caused by noise and light pollution, as well as the destruction of ecosystems and habitats as a consequence of developments being built on inappropriate locations.

Yes

Representation ID: 94122

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Samantha Stafford Scott

Yes, however consideration should also be given to protecting important wildlife corridors that connect to local green spaces/ nature reserves. Developing near these could have huge detrimental impacts on protected species as a result of light and noise pollution from developments.

Yes

Representation ID: 94126

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mr David Kelly

Should also protect established wildlife corridors connected to Nature
Reserves and vital wildlife sites. Need to consider the damage to these sensitive sites from noise and light pollution as well as the destruction of ecosystems and habitats as a result of inappropriate development locations.

Yes

Representation ID: 94363

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Carol Clark

There are important habitat sites including small woodland areas and mature trees in area SG24 which need to be preserved as they have evolved over a long period of time and no new measures could replace them.

No

Representation ID: 94381

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Alan Blandamer

The policy does not provide enough detail on how important environmental assets will be protected and enhanced, especially when a large number of the allocations are next to and even covering important Local Wildlife Sites. There should be protection of established wildlife corridors connected to Nature Reserves and vital wildlife sites. Also need to consider the damage to these sensitive sites from noise and light pollution as well as the destruction of ecosystems and habitats as a result of inappropriate development locations.

No

Representation ID: 94642

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Miss Renny Wodynska

No. The policy does not provide enough detail on how important environmental assets will be protected and enhanced, especially when a large number of the allocations are next to and even covering important designated Local Wildlife Sites.

Yes

Representation ID: 94943

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Jonathan Ainsworth

Yes and shoujd also protect establihsed wildlife corridors connected to nature reserves and wildlife sites.

Yes

Representation ID: 95042

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Lynette Sutton

Essential these sites are protected
Plus resident access to the countryside/footpaths

Yes

Representation ID: 95054

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Tracey Grimes

Can't emphasis how important this is for the community. There is too much destruction of nature reserves and green belts for housing. There will be extra pollution, noise, less trees for wildlife and the reduction of small animals if the development is allowed to proceed next to the Welcombe Hills.

No

Representation ID: 95087

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mr T Finerty

Incorrect application.
Building on Green belt destroys sites and habitats and reduces biodiversity

No

Representation ID: 95128

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Anna Finerty

Building on greenbelt / site B1 will destroy sites, and ruin habitats and species, biodiverstity will obviously be reduced and negatively impacted. And the bats will be further reduced.

Yes

Representation ID: 95241

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Kineton Parish Council

when finalising policy wording consider detailing how important environmental assets will be protected and enhanced,

No

Representation ID: 95242

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Edward Wilson

This is again entirely aspirational twaddle. The mass sprawl of development and solar panels will destroy wildlife habitat on a grand scale. The focus on special sites and reserves is a hugely insular way of viewing our superb countryside and ignoring the benfits of agricultural land to both feeding the population and giving mental health relief.

No

Representation ID: 95261

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Emma Restall Orr

The policy does not provide enough detail on how our county's important environmental assets will be protected and enhanced, especially when a large number of the allocations are next to and even covering important designated Local Wildlife Sites. This contradicts any assertion that policies will protect. Where there is enough money and canny know-how, valuable environmental sites will be compromised if we don't have stricter and clearer controls.

Yes

Representation ID: 95331

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Lee Tallen

Yes of course such areas should be protected. Unfortunately have seen recently how wild hedgerows have been allowed to be torn down etc at the large bishopton developments. Protection should include consideration of the whole ecosystem - not just the habitat itself - negative impacts of traffic, noise, lack of light etc

No

Representation ID: 95334

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Kristina Tristram

No. The policy does not provide enough detail on how important environmental assets will be protected and enhanced, especially when a large number of allocations are next to and even covering important designated local wildlife sites.

No

Representation ID: 95468

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Sue Cuff

The policy does not provide enough detail on how important environmental assets will be protected and enhanced, especially when a large number of the allocations are next to and even covering important designated Local Wildlife Sites.

No

Representation ID: 95519

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Martin Freeman

The policy does not provide enough detail on how important environmental assets will be
protected and enhanced, especially when a large number of the allocations are next to and
even covering important designated Local Wildlife Sites.