Yes

Representation ID: 86143

Received: 12/01/2025

Respondent: Sandy McCaskie

N/A

Yes

Representation ID: 86707

Received: 29/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Peter Bridgewater

Cycling, off-road cycling, walking and running in S Warks countryside should be actively encouraged in all circumstances. This requires the rural areas to be protected and for access to be enhanced in a very meaningful way.

No

Representation ID: 86955

Received: 31/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Arthur Hogan-Fleming

Like part of KES fields currently being turned into housing? Such as suggested just more poorly maintained (if maintained at all) areas.

Yes

Representation ID: 87105

Received: 03/02/2025

Respondent: S Gardner

More consideration needs to be placed on developers to provide this as part of their development portfolios

Yes

Representation ID: 87438

Received: 08/02/2025

Respondent: Cllr Andrew Day

None

Yes

Representation ID: 87613

Received: 09/02/2025

Respondent: mrs susan morris

I agree

Other

Representation ID: 88855

Received: 18/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Ida Marjorie Brown

Agree in principle but more all weather surfaces need to be made available and maintained.

Yes

Representation ID: 89152

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Mr nigel Freeth

N/A

Other

Representation ID: 89411

Received: 20/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Tim Twynam

Some compromises will have to be made

Yes

Representation ID: 90562

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Gavin Simpson

We need green spaces. Do not develop them over brownfield areas

Yes

Representation ID: 91229

Received: 25/02/2025

Respondent: Radford Semele Parish Council

Radford Semele Parish Council supports the suggestions.

Yes

Representation ID: 91593

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sidney Syson

No further comment

Yes

Representation ID: 91721

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Geoff Norman

Sensible

Yes

Representation ID: 92516

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Julian Brown

Agree in principle but more should be done for "local centres" to have indoor as well as outdoor. All the ideas are excellent but who is funding all this development?

Yes

Representation ID: 92668

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Richard Yates

Sites should be chosen which have well lit cycle and walkways. Sufficient EV parking and SOlar energy to help reduce costs of floodlighting.

Yes

Representation ID: 93042

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Alison Blake

Absolutely

Yes

Representation ID: 93340

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mr geoff marston

consideration should be made to linking communities with cycle friendly routes and upgrading some footpaths to bridleways....possible incentivising landowners to create more footpaths and bridleways

Yes

Representation ID: 93562

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Wellesbourne and Walton Parish Council

A full audit of outdoor sports and leisure facilities should be undertaken so that resources can be directed to those areas where there is an under provision. Wellesbourne and Walton Parish is already identified by SDC in its Core Strategy to have a deficit and nothing has yet been done to remedy this.

Yes

Representation ID: 93817

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mr William Campbell

Strongly agree

No

Representation ID: 93973

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Carina Taylor

I don't believe it will be improved, build new communities around leisure facilities, change peoples perception of healthy living. The proposals are disconnected from the new houses particularly in Alcester.

No

Representation ID: 94663

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Miss Renny Wodynska

The policy on outdoor sports & leisure (DPD 44) doesn't recognise that fields are
becoming increasingly unplayable due to waterlogging - there needs to be a more serious
adaptation plan than is mentioned here.

Yes

Representation ID: 94901

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Stratford-upon-Avon Town Transport Group

The policy should be expanded to include the protection of school playing fields.

No

Representation ID: 95284

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Kineton Parish Council

as drafted the policy is appallingly weak. Wording lacks clarity.
“adequate alternative provision is available to meet the needs of the area” -Define adequate.
“secured on or off site that are equally accessible to the community” - Define equally accessible. How? By public transport? How far away?
"Where strategic residential development is proposed the provision of new facilities will be sought." This will enable a developer to offer new facilities at a cost or accessibility out of reach to the users of the existing facilities

No

Representation ID: 95716

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: David Wilson Homes

Agent: Harris Lamb

The Policy should provide clear guidance on the potential amount of open space and outdoor sports and leisure provision that will be expected with new developments.

Yes

Representation ID: 95976

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Paul Tesh

Yes

Yes

Representation ID: 96371

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Southam Town Council

Southam Town, District and County elected representatives support this Policy Direction.

Yes

Representation ID: 96504

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Shipston Town Council

Facilities provided by new development appears to result in a focus on children's play area with little or no attention to adult needs.

Yes

Representation ID: 96669

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Peter Nixon

Need to strictly monitor developers to ensure facilities are appropriate and large enough for local population.

No

Representation ID: 96675

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Peter Nixon

There needs to be more retention of these sports sites. Once developers have decided it is not needed and built on it there is no going back.

Yes

Representation ID: 96862

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Margaret Jeffery

N/A