Yes

Representation ID: 93351

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mr geoff marston

Yes, but again only in principle.
The National Landscape Area is important. However it is essential to provide more clarity and specific details on how the buffer will work in practice. There should also be clear contracting and sufficient powers to refuse future applications that impact this important landscape area. There should also be clear accountability and meaningful actions if there are breaches.

Yes

Representation ID: 93406

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mr David Haggarty

N/A

Yes

Representation ID: 93819

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mr William Campbell

Strongly agree

Yes

Representation ID: 95285

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Emma Restall Orr

The National Landscape Area is important, although it is essential to provide more details on how the buffer will work in practice. There must be sufficient powers to refuse future applications that impact this important landscape area. Otherwise it will slowly be eroded and lose any real value.

Yes

Representation ID: 95301

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Kineton Parish Council

no further comment

Yes

Representation ID: 95479

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Sue Cuff

in principle. The National Landscape Area is important, although it is essential to provide more details on how the buffer will work in practice, and that there are sufficient powers to refuse future applications that impact this important landscape area.

Other

Representation ID: 95540

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Martin Freeman

Yes, in principle. The National Landscape Area is important, although it is essential to provide
more details on how the buer will work in practice, and that there are sucient powers to
refuse future applications that impact this important landscape area.

Yes

Representation ID: 95788

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Bloor Homes Western

Agent: Marrons

The importance of protecting the Cotswold National Landscape is recognised, however clarity and robust justification on the proposed extent of any necessary ‘buffer zones’ is required.

Other

Representation ID: 95978

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Paul Tesh

Yes. Should the depth of the buffer zone be prescribed? There is no mention of the "Dunsmore and Feldon" Special Landscape Area 97 which abuts the Cotswold National Landscape area. The "Dunsmore and Feldon" Special landscape Area needs protection as well.

Yes

Representation ID: 96137

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Rosemary Collier

Yes, in principle. The National Landscape Area is important, although it is essential to provide more details on how the buffer will work in practice, and that there are sufficient powers to refuse future applications that impact this important landscape area.

Yes

Representation ID: 96373

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Southam Town Council

Southam Town, District and County elected representatives support this Policy Direction.

Yes

Representation ID: 96502

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Shipston Town Council

The depth of the buffer zone needs to reviewed after a period to assess its effectiveness.

Yes

Representation ID: 97111

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Alcester Town Council

This approach is agreed by Alcester Town Council, Arrow with Weethley Parish Council, Kinwarton Parish Council, Wixford Parish Council and Great Alne Parish Council (together referred to as Alcester Parishes Group or ‘APG’).

Yes

Representation ID: 97170

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: John Dinnie

Extending the Buffer Zone to 5km or at least identifying this as an area of restraint as identified in Policy Direction 45 would further protect and allow the potential for enhancement of the national landscape. The Policy should also encourage the creation of more public rights of way to increase the public access to the enjoyment of the landscape so protected.

Yes

Representation ID: 97234

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Tysoe Parish Council

Yes

Yes

Representation ID: 97284

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Squab Hall Farm

Agent: Mr Jack Barnes

The importance of protecting the Cotswold National Landscape is recognised, however clarity and justification on the proposed extent of ‘buffer zones’ is required.

Other

Representation ID: 97831

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mr HUGH KEEP

Yes but I believe the purpose should be to conserve and enhance the natural beauty AND BIODIVERSITY of the area.

Yes

Representation ID: 97966

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Brenda Stewart

The character of the Cotswolds should be protected by having this buffer zone

Yes

Representation ID: 98020

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Helen Little

Y

Yes

Representation ID: 98031

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Barnabas Harrison

Agree

Yes

Representation ID: 98137

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: William Davis Limited

Agent: Marrons

The importance of protecting the Cotswold National Landscape is recognised. The Interactive Map illustrates a 3km buffer, although this is not referenced in the Preferred Options document. Clarity and justification on the extent of buffer zone will be important to ensure the Policy is justified in line with NPPF Paragraph 36 b). Any Policy wording should ensure flexibility within the buffer zones to ensure they are not overly restrictive to development proposals which would otherwise have a limited impact on the National Landscape. This will allow the Policy to be considered positively prepared in line with NPPF Paragraph 36 a).

Yes

Representation ID: 98628

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: X2 New Settlement Consortium

Agent: Mr Jack Barnes

The importance of protecting the Cotswold National Landscape is recognised, however clarity and justification on the proposed extent of ‘buffer zones’ is required.

Yes

Representation ID: 98696

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Alice Hibbert

The National Landscape Area is important, although it is essential to provide more details on how the buffer will work in practice, and that there are sufficient powers to refuse future applications that impact this important landscape area.

Yes

Representation ID: 98723

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Ginny White

It is important to have more details about the buffer zone and how it will work in practice, also to know that sufficient powers are in place to refuse future applications that may impact this important landscape area.

Other

Representation ID: 98843

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Philip Sykes

Whilst the Buffer Zone is a step in the right direction it is inadequate. 'Landscape' is by its very nature a big thing. A 3km buffer zone is way too small to achieve the necessary protection. Too timid.

Yes

Representation ID: 98947

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Roger Shimmin

The wording should be amended to show that AONB will remain the same , not just largely the same.

Yes

Representation ID: 99395

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Tania White

If an area is of outstanding natural beauty, it needs to be preserved to provide open spaces for people to enjoy

Yes

Representation ID: 99690

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Gillian Padgham

agree

Yes

Representation ID: 100069

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Steven Coulsting

I do agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-46- Protecting the Cotswold National Landscape

Yes

Representation ID: 100456

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Adrian Parsons

I absolutely agree with the approach laid out