Yes

Representation ID: 86147

Received: 12/01/2025

Respondent: Sandy McCaskie

N/A

Yes

Representation ID: 86345

Received: 21/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Noel Davis

lanscape character is imprtant. High density Urban sprawl is soul destroying

Yes

Representation ID: 86710

Received: 29/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Peter Bridgewater

Make this stronger. It comes across as a token "we will try..."

No

Representation ID: 86959

Received: 31/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Arthur Hogan-Fleming

Stopping development will save the landscape

Yes

Representation ID: 87109

Received: 03/02/2025

Respondent: S Gardner

Yes

Other

Representation ID: 87116

Received: 03/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Steph Johnson

I believe that the wording of this policy is mis-leading suggesting that the warwickshire countryside will be protected when it actual fact it is saying the opposite. Where the character and bio-diversity of an area will be negatively affected and even harmed, this area should not be built upon. No amount of work by a developer will mitigate this.

Yes

Representation ID: 87442

Received: 08/02/2025

Respondent: Cllr Andrew Day

None

Yes

Representation ID: 88860

Received: 18/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Ida Marjorie Brown

Agree

Yes

Representation ID: 89113

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Stratford upon Avon District Council

i agree

Yes

Representation ID: 89159

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Mr nigel Freeth

all proposed green belt development areas around Alcester will harm the special landscape character of the area

Yes

Representation ID: 89229

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Suzanna Hughes

Areas where you can’t mitigate the effect of development on the landscape should be protected from development at all costs, how can you mitigate the effect of development in picturesque open green areas. These should not be developed

Yes

Representation ID: 89418

Received: 20/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Tim Twynam

Agree

Other

Representation ID: 89655

Received: 21/02/2025

Respondent: Simon Cook

Development should not be allowed in the area, and the caveats should be removed (such as that ‘unless there would be an over-riding benefit, for instance to meet an evidenced local housing need’). The Local Plan should be allocating suitable land for housing need.

No

Representation ID: 89714

Received: 21/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Graham Bamford

This approach as it stands will result in tremendous harm to the landscape. South Warwickshire is generally rural and thought of as countryside in the large part, There have already been too many harmful developments and we should not worsen this. The countryside is an escape for city dwellers of South Birmingham/ Solihull/ Coventry and should be kept that way. It's generally a beautiful area dotted with smaller towns which fit well with the nature of the county. Loss of green fields, country walks, cycling routes, peaceful canal journeys is far from desirable.

No

Representation ID: 89886

Received: 21/02/2025

Respondent: Emily Buxton-Woodcock

Development should not be allowed in the area, and the caveats should be removed (such as that ‘unless there would be an over-riding benefit, for instance to meet an evidenced local housing need’). The Local Plan should be allocating suitable land for housing need. Stop destroying our planet.

Yes

Representation ID: 89915

Received: 21/02/2025

Respondent: Dr Stephen Browett

I agree with the sentiment but am concerned with the lack on detail on this point.

No

Representation ID: 89938

Received: 21/02/2025

Respondent: Mr O Johnson

Development should not be allowed in the area, and the caveats should be removed (such as that ‘unless there would be an over-riding benefit, for instance to meet an evidenced local housing need’). The Local Plan should be allocating suitable land for housing need.

Yes

Representation ID: 90032

Received: 22/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Fiona Macvie

If it is not possible to mitigate the effects of urban development on the landscape, the are should not be developed.

Yes

Representation ID: 90291

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Maria Giblin

Areas where you can't mitigate the effect of development on the landscape should be protected from development

Yes

Representation ID: 90293

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Dean Giblin

Areas where you can’t mitigate the effect of development on the landscape should be protected from any further development to preserve their natural state.

No

Representation ID: 90349

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Miss Julia Gibson

Development should not be allowed in the area, and the caveats should be removed (such as that ‘unless there would be an over-riding benefit, for instance to meet an evidenced local housing need’). The Local Plan should be allocating suitable land for housing need.

Yes

Representation ID: 90462

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sheetal Tailor

In areas where you cannot mitigate the effect of development, the landscape should then be protected from development.

Other

Representation ID: 90611

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Simon Pack

Development should not be allowed in the area, and the caveats should be removed (such as that ‘unless there would be an over-riding benefit, for instance to meet an evidenced local housing need’). The Local Plan should be allocating suitable land for housing need.

Yes

Representation ID: 90762

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Tim Goodwin

All areas where SLA will be detrimentally affected by urbanisation should be protected from development.

Yes

Representation ID: 90898

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Mr James Morris

Regions where development cannot be mitigated without harming the landscape should be safeguarded from such activities. These areas are crucial for preserving natural beauty, ecological balance, and biodiversity. By protecting them, we ensure the long-term health of the environment and maintain the unique characteristics that define these landscapes. This approach is essential for sustainable development, as it balances economic growth with environmental conservation. Implementing strict regulations and conservation measures can help prevent irreversible damage and promote responsible land use. Ultimately, protecting these areas is a commitment to future generations, ensuring they can enjoy and benefit from the natural world.

Yes

Representation ID: 90917

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Emma Barber

Regions where development cannot be mitigated without harming the landscape should be safeguarded from such activities. These areas are crucial for preserving natural beauty, ecological balance, and biodiversity. Protecting them, we ensure the long-term health of the environment and maintain the unique characteristics that define these landscapes. This approach is essential for sustainable development, it strikes a balance between economic growth and environmental conservation. Implementing stringent regulations and conservation measures can help prevent irreversible damage and promote responsible land use. Ultimately, protecting these areas is a commitment to future generations, ensuring they can enjoy and benefit from the natural world.

Other

Representation ID: 90960

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Jason Lupton

This should link with Special Landscape Areas.
If an area can't be mitigated the landscape should be protected from development.

Yes

Representation ID: 91233

Received: 25/02/2025

Respondent: Radford Semele Parish Council

Radford Semele Parish Council supports the suggestions.

No

Representation ID: 91414

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Lucia Restall Orr

Development should not be allowed in the area, and the caveats should be removed (such as that ‘unless there would be an over-riding benefit, for instance to meet an evidenced local housing need’). The Local Plan should be allocating suitable land for housing need.

No

Representation ID: 91524

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Mary Adams

Development should not be allowed in the area, and the caveats should be removed (such as that ‘unless there would be an over-riding benefit, for instance to meet an evidenced local housing need’). The Local Plan should be allocating suitable land for housing need.