Yes

Representation ID: 102244

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Deeley Homes Ltd

Agent: RCA Regeneration

All sites should be assessed now, to support allocations under DPD3.

The methodology should include a positive weighting for sites that constitute Grey Belt.

SIte 583 constitutes Grey Belt and is suitable to be released for development.

Residential development would not be located within flood risk areas, so the developable area should be reduced and the score increased accordingly.

The scoring methodology for the criteria rural listed buildings, scheduled monuments, LWS should not be applied at such a strategic level.

There should be positive weighting/scoring to reflect the connectivity of the site via the local rail station.

Other

Representation ID: 102258

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Grevayne Properties Limited

Agent: The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

We continue to promote the site at Springfield Farm, Harbury (site ref: 491). The HELAA assessment of Sites Ref: 491 demonstrates that there are no significant constraints to the development of the land. Site Ref 491 has been attributed a favourable, lower mid-range, HELAA Part B score.

The site is a logical and sustainable location for residential development and provides opportunities for self-build and/or market housing. In accordance with the NPPF, it is suggested that the land at Springfield Farm (site ref: 491) is entirely appropriate for allocation for residential development within the SWLP.

Yes

Representation ID: 102311

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Richborough

Agent: Marrons

In relation to HELAA Site 199, we raise into question the utility and methodology of a number of the HELAA results, including:
- A climate resilient and Net Zero Carbon South Warwickshire
- A well-designed and beautiful South Warwickshire
- A well-connected South Warwickshire
- A biodiverse and environmentally-resilient South Warwickshire
- Viability

No

Representation ID: 102336

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Orbit Homes and Grevayne Properties

Agent: Marrons

Comments made in respect to HELAA Site 827:
Viability and delivery - Orbit and Grevayne Properties can confirm development is viable and deliverable.
Mineral safeguarding areas - noted 60% of the site is within the MSA however it would not be viable or appropriate to extract resources on this site given its scale and urban context.
Surface water - although 12% of site covered, this is to rear and does not preclude development.
Listed buildings and conservation areas - any harm can be mitigated through careful masterplanning.
Habitat value - ecological features do not preclude development, and can be retained.

Other

Representation ID: 102360

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Roger Bennett

REFID 193 Ashow village roads are very narrow, most with no paths. Traffic and road safety, especially with a 30mph speed limit, is a concern. Deliveries and service vehicles are becoming more frequent and constantly block the narrow roads. More discussions are required within the village to discuss this potential expansion. Perhaps a referendum is needed :)
If it must go ahead what advantages could there be for all residents regards a) Paths & Road Safety b) Mains Sewerage to name just two.
Grove Lane is currently a wonderful, tranquil rural setting on a very quiet single lane narrow road.

Yes

Representation ID: 102391

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Richborough

Agent: Marrons

Richborough respectfully request that Land south of Chichester Lane (Site 55) be included in the SWLP as a ‘small allocation’ to bolster the five-year land supply, for the following reasons:
- Alignment with Priority Areas
- Alignment with Spatial Strategy
- Alignment with the Overarching Principles and Commentary on the HELAA
- Green Belt - the site is grey belt and should be prioritised for release from the Green Belt accordingly.
- Infrastructure Requirements and Delivery
- Right Choice for Development at Hampton Magna

Yes

Representation ID: 102397

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Alison Potterton

RefID 539: Cherington West (West), Camperdown FarM

The village has a housing needs report showing a need for 19 homes. In the future, this site could suit 60 homes of which a third could be affordable. The area could also provide much needed infrastructure for waste water which is flooding the main road into the nearby river every time it rains.
A school and/or shop could also be considered.
Mixed Use appropriate.

The site is nearby a medieval hamlet (Weston) destroyed in 1500 AD

The site is NOT suitable for the proposed 816 homes.

Yes

Representation ID: 102406

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Jaguar Land Rover

Agent: Marrons

JLR are confident proposals can be satisfactorily accommodated without causing significant harm to constraints that would preclude its allocation and release from the Green Belt. The land is previously developed and in part grey belt, and should be prioritised for release from the Green Belt to meet economic needs and the needs of JLR.

The circumstances in relation to Fen End are unique in that this is an existing operational site and JLR have a need to have flexibility to expand its operations on the site for future development, if required.

Yes

Representation ID: 102428

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr guy evans

It seemed that the methodology of the first stage HALAA is flawed and Hopefully site Pacific Study will be done at the second stage Taking into the reality of what is on the ground.

Yes

Representation ID: 102474

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Deeley Homes Dean Weldon

We support the inclusion of Site 240 within a priority area for growth and support its allocation for residential and community uses.

Yes

Representation ID: 102488

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Sam Loughrey Black

Land East of Cubbington, Rugby Road, Cubbington, CV37 7JL refid 202
The children in the school will already have the disruption and noise from HS2, they don't need a building site behind them. This is also a well used walking place for people who live in Cubbington and we have already lost enough green spaces due to HS2 and other housing that has recently been built.

Yes

Representation ID: 102530

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Jaguar Land Rover

Agent: Marrons

JLR have several comments on the HELAA results score for Site 375 at Land South of JLR, Gaydon.

In relation to surface water flooding, the area is small (13%) and is constrained to part of the site boundaries and so does not preclude development. The Site has low/moderate visual sensitivity and small pockets of habitat value, but any impacts can be mitigated through careful masterplanning and landscape design. Harm to the nearby listed building at All Saints Church to the southwest can be avoided through supplementing the existing significant tree belt between the Site and the asset.

JLR submitted a Preliminary Landscape and Visual Appraisal in response to the Issues and Options consultation, and this is appended again with these representations along with a Vision Document for the site. Should the Councils have any residual concerns in relation to landscape and visual impacts, JLR would be happy to meet to discuss.

In relation to connectivity, the Site would be accessed through and form an extended part of the existing Gaydon Site and Proposal GLH within the adopted Local Plan where 3,000 homes and community infrastructure and services are planned within the lifetime of the Plan. The accessibility of this location to workers and facilities will therefore be improved over the course of the Plan period such that connectivity will not be an issue.

JLR are confident development proposals can therefore be satisfactorily accommodated without causing significant harm to constraints that would preclude its allocation.

Please see attachment for more details.

Yes

Representation ID: 102543

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Jaguar Land Rover

Agent: Marrons

JLR have the following comments on the HELAA results score for Site 376 at Land West of JLR, Gaydon.

The Site falls marginally outside of Priority Area 2 but clearly its development would be accessed and well related to the ongoing operations at Gaydon. In relation to surface water flooding, the area is small (5%) and does not preclude development. The Site has low visual sensitivity and small pockets of habitat value, and any impacts can be mitigated through careful masterplanning and landscape design.

Please also find attached a supporting Landscape and Visual Appraisal.

No

Representation ID: 102600

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: IM Land 1 Limited

Agent: Turley

To ensure that everyone can understand the results of the assessment, and to justify allocations, the methodology needs to be clear, consistent and easy to understand. IM Lands comments relate to site ref ID: 197 only should be taken in to consideration.

Yes

Representation ID: 102629

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Oliver Aries

In Radford Semele I Object to Preferred sites North of Offchurch Land as it is a designated Local Green Space and preferred site behind Radford Semele Primary school as it is not preferred in the Neighbourhood Plan, would close the space between Radford Semele and Sydenham.

Yes

Representation ID: 102658

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Richard Jackson

Site 469 – Situated directly behind Lilac View.
100% of the site intersects with area of moderate visual sensitivity.
Flooding and drainage are issues of significance in the light of regular flooding now occurring at establish housing in Willow Grove, particularly since the recent new housing adjacent development.
The site is outside the Built Up Area Boundary.
The reasoning for including this site (and others in Long Itchington) makes no reference to the Neighbourhood Plan.
As long as this (and the other sites) remain in the SWLP this offers legitimacy which is not based on clear evidence or need.

Yes

Representation ID: 102675

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Elizabeth White

HIGH LEVEL TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT Document no: B23WCS01/REP/001 Revision no: 9 is FUNDAMENTALLY FLAWED.

Whilst it is reassuring that Issues and Options Broad Location ‘Whitnash’ (which in fact covered the stables and farms at the heart of rural Radford Semele) does not appear in the Preferred Options Consultation:

Shapefile SWLP60 ’Whitnash’ = Radford Semele persists:

1/7 ‘Whitnash’ B4086 = Stratford-upon Avon – Warmington via Wellesbourne+ Kineton!
2/7,3/7,4/7,5/7,6/7 = ‘Hatton Park’!
7/7 ‘Whitnash’!

Shapefile SWLP33 Radford Semele (genuinely)

1/7 Radford Semele B439 = Stratford-upon-Avon - Salford Priors via Bidford-on-Avon!
2/7,3/7,4/7,5/7,6/7 = ‘Stratford-upon-Avon South’!
7/7 Radford Semele!

HELAA affected: 658,700,225,142,182,664,65,209,98 and 575.

Yes

Representation ID: 102679

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Summers Holdings Ltd

Agent: The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

Site 515 is a logical extension to Tanworth in Arden. It has existing development or roads to each boundary. It lies between new settlements, A1 and A2, close to 2 railway stations and bus stops. It is adjacent to Tanworth in Arden Primary School. It is Grey Belt, with no constraints and a favourable lower HELAA Part B score. New settlement A2 is ranked by the Districts as the 6th most preferable. The site could be suitable for the expansion of the facilities at the Primary Schools supporting housing growth in the area.

No

Representation ID: 102690

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr David Cook

Ref ID 55 Land South of Chichester Lane, Hampton Magna

Inappropriate Green Belt development.

Increased traffic flows through existing roads struggling to cope with additional traffic now and introducing further congestion in the area, exacerbating rat-running through local villages. There is no room to expand existing access routes into and out of Warwick and to the M40.

Loss of trees and meadowlands for carbon capture and oxygen generation, further destruction of wildlife habitat.

Revised use of land will affect the natural flow of water courses.

Additional load on current water supply and drainage which is already struggling to cope.

Other

Representation ID: 102716

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Deeley Homes Dean Weldon

Site Ref 696 - Land at Waterloo Road, Bidford on Avon

Other

Representation ID: 102723

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Barratt David Wilson Homes (Mercia)

In support of our representations to the HELAA in respect of the land to the east of Bishop's Itchington, we attach a recently produced draft layout plan.

Yes

Representation ID: 102756

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr David Cook

Ref ID 95 Land at Old Budbrooke Road, Hampton Magna

Inappropriate Green Belt development.

Loss of trees and meadowlands for carbon capture and oxygen generation, further destruction of wildlife habitat.

Loss of recreational amenity affecting mental health/wellbeing.

Revised use of land will affect the natural flow of water courses.

Increased traffic flows through narrow and twisting lanes. Local highways cannot cope with additional traffic now, Stanks roundabout (A4177/A46) is no exception. No room to expand existing access routes into and out of Warwick, to the M40.

Additional load on current water supply and drainage which is already struggling to cope.

Yes

Representation ID: 102797

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr David Cook

Ref ID 145 Land to West of Hampton Magna

Inappropriate Green Belt development.

Loss of trees and meadowlands for carbon capture and oxygen generation, further destruction of wildlife habitat.

Revised use of land will affect the natural flow of water courses and exacerbate local flooding.

Increased traffic flows through narrow and twisting lanes. Additional traffic flows to Birmingham Road junction and Stanks roundabout (A4177/A46). There is no room to expand existing access routes into and out of Warwick and to the M40.

Additional load on current water supply, drainage and sewerage take-away which is already struggling to cope.

Yes

Representation ID: 102822

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Elizabeth Browne

Please refer back to my previous comments, specifically impact on Kenilworth Castle and lack of consideration of impact on HS2 on existing Green Belt.

No

Representation ID: 102912

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr David Cook

Ref ID 233 Land to North of Hampton Magna

Inappropriate Green Belt development.

Hilly site and new homes will overlook existing homes.

Loss of trees and meadowlands for carbon capture and oxygen generation, further destruction of wildlife habitat and destruction of medieval village remains.

Loss of access to rural footpaths.

Increased traffic flows through narrow and twisting lanes.

Additional load on current water supply and drainage which is already struggling to cope.

Likelihood of further flooding from Gog Brook due to loss of old fish ponds at the foot of the site.

Threat to the peace/tranquillity of the Churchyard.

Yes

Representation ID: 102926

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Deeley Homes Dean Weldon

Site 820 - Land East of Kineton Road, Pillerton Priors

Yes

Representation ID: 102934

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Bloor Homes

Agent: Marrons

Bloor Homes respectfully request that Land at Harbury Station (Site 377) be included in the SWLP as an allocated site, for the following reasons:
-Alignment with Priority Areas and Spatial Strategy
-Alignment with the Overarching Principles
-It is the Right Choice for Development near to Harbury.

Alternatively, should Site 377 not be considered appropriate in its entirety for inclusion within the Plan, Bloor Homes would respectfully request that the land east of Harbury for circa 150 dwellings be allocated as part of Site 377.

Yes

Representation ID: 102957

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Deeley Homes

Agent: Delta Planning

Deeley Homes raises some concerns in relation to the HELAA assessment of Land North of Leamington Road, Long Itchington. Deeley Homes considers that Land North of Leamington Road, Long Itchington should be allocated for residential development in order to contribute towards meeting the identified significant housing need. Please refer to the full responses for further details.

Yes

Representation ID: 102958

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Simon Rhodes

There is a vital need for new houses to be built in Warwickshire, which I fully support. I do however have serious misgivings about the possible developments on sites 148 and 747. Specifically, the current infrastructure would not sustain the increased traffic. There is a lack of access to main roads and the bridges in Honington and Barcheston are not designed for higher volumes of traffic. Equally, both sites are at risk of serious flooding. Finally, there would need to be additional school, healthcare and public transport facilities to cater for a larger population.

Yes

Representation ID: 102991

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Dulcie Swanston

Grove Lane : REF ID 193. Additional properties in this village will cause significant disruption, during construction and after. This is a 60% increase in the number of residents with a single lane roadway . Access to the planned location is restricted both up Grove Lane and there is no access up the side of Long Row that is feasible during construction and post completion. The construction traffic would dangerous to the many children in the village and people walking. There is no mains sewers so additional traffic for sceptic tank clearance would be needed.