Yes

Representation ID: 86196

Received: 15/01/2025

Respondent: Professor Paul Bywaters

.

No

Representation ID: 86229

Received: 16/01/2025

Respondent: Ms Alice Hobson

The Europa Way developments already look so depressing and there's nothing for anyone to do there. Focus on building amenities for these communities before building more houses.

Yes

Representation ID: 86234

Received: 17/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Mark Brightburn

Subject to careful thought on infrastructure, not just more and more housing, or this becomes a car-based location, highly unsustainable. Need the bus and cycle routes with FULL connectivity to town centres and facilities. Need local centres with local provision in walking distance. Developers should not be allowed to only deliver the housing. The character of these places could also be dramatically improved. Current 'anywhere'. Same standard housebuilder boxes. Needs a lot more effort to make it 'Leamington/Warwick' specific. Add character as a key requirement in place-making.

Yes

Representation ID: 86265

Received: 18/01/2025

Respondent: Ms Ruth Buckley

Yes, provided that no green belt land is used and that adequate services are provided.

Yes

Representation ID: 86344

Received: 21/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Noel Davis

na

No

Representation ID: 86540

Received: 28/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Rory Hawkins

Leamington and the surrounding areas simply don't have the road infrastructure to cope with additional housing so close to the town centre. A significant amount of housing has already been added in the south of Leamington/Warwick which has caused a significant increase in congestion in getting in/out/around the the local area during peak hours/weekends. Given the location of the M40, getting in/out of south Leamington is already quite challenging at those time as well, without adding more traffic. New housing would be better suited in new the new settlement format where it won't add to the already overloaded infrastructure.

Yes

Representation ID: 86556

Received: 28/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Peter Bridgewater

Reduces travel time and pollution by keeping development to the borders of already developed areas.

Yes

Representation ID: 86769

Received: 29/01/2025

Respondent: Mr russell gillott

already considerable developments and infrastructure there.

Yes

Representation ID: 87035

Received: 03/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Judith Corless

this area has had a large amount of housing built within the last few years. It has excellent links to major roads. It probably needs a consolidation period but new housing could be located here in the future with careful planning.

Yes

Representation ID: 87342

Received: 08/02/2025

Respondent: Cllr Andrew Day

Provided there is a new M40 junction and the mix of employment use provides for a diverse range of needs, not just distribution sheds.

No

Representation ID: 87478

Received: 09/02/2025

Respondent: John Murphy

This is too much like uncontrolled urban sprawl - development should be contained N of A41 and M40 - if it carries on like this it will eventually merge with Newbold Pacey and Wellesbourne...

Yes

Representation ID: 87497

Received: 09/02/2025

Respondent: mrs susan morris

Land here is the correct size of leamington for the supermarkets, train station and motorway links.

No

Representation ID: 87524

Received: 09/02/2025

Respondent: Michaelina Jakala

I do not support - too much development with too little infrastructure.

No

Representation ID: 87640

Received: 09/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Richard Grey

This proposal represents urban sprawl at its worse and removes good qualuty agricultural land and open space in an area that has already suffered much loss around a historic county town. There is also poor access ti the motorway travelling from the south putting unnecessay pressure on the Banbury Road

No

Representation ID: 87805

Received: 11/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Emily Godson

The existing developments in this area have already caused significant disruption and highlighted the lack of community infrastructure. It has placed an immense strain on routes into both Warwick and Leamington because the 'in town' areas are unable to adapt to the increase in traffic. Traffic flows are awful (and will continue to be even after the 'improvements'), particularly around Princes Drive, Emscote Road and Myton Road, not to mention traffic up Europa Way.

No

Representation ID: 87869

Received: 11/02/2025

Respondent: Sam Walton

If possible a new junction should be considered in this area to combine J13 and J14, as the distance to/from J15 is too short, and traffic is a serious problem in this area already.

Yes

Representation ID: 87985

Received: 13/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sharon Quantrill

Part of an urban area

Yes

Representation ID: 87989

Received: 13/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sharon Quantrill

Not in greenbelt

Yes

Representation ID: 87990

Received: 13/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Simon Quantrill

Yes as urban

Yes

Representation ID: 88071

Received: 13/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs vivien bryer

not in greenbelt

No

Representation ID: 88135

Received: 13/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Anne Parry

Significant harm to the character of the landscape and increasing traffic congestion to Warwick and Leamington Spa plus the M40 - further urbanisation of the area.

No

Representation ID: 88169

Received: 14/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Rozanne Harris

Although SG09 benefits from being close to the main road network it is already a nightmare to travel into Leamington this way. This has only become more difficult with the ongoing new build locations on the south of Leam. Its a no go driving area at peak times.

Yes

Representation ID: 88241

Received: 14/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Ida Marjorie Brown

Positive transport links will require further road improvements but Leamington and Warwick is a sought after location but this should only go to the Europa Way Island meets the A452 - the boundary.

No

Representation ID: 88270

Received: 10/02/2025

Respondent: Juliet Bates

I am concerned about the proposals for new settlements and industries near the M40 in Waspington and Barford. There has been insufficient consideration for the necessary facilities to support the increased population and traffic. As a nurse at Warwick Hospital, I see how services are already overwhelmed, with a lack of beds and GP appointments leading to more A&E visits. Local emergency services are also underfunded. I believe it is crucial to develop infrastructure for current residents and businesses before expanding further. I cannot support these developments until proper infrastructure is in place.

Yes

Representation ID: 88624

Received: 17/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Jerry Corless

N/A

Yes

Representation ID: 88687

Received: 17/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Gillian Browne

This land is not designated green belt land and links to existing settlements.

Yes

Representation ID: 89036

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sara Bird

Good access to existing infrastructure and transport options

Yes

Representation ID: 89519

Received: 20/02/2025

Respondent: Miss Emily Carleton

Non green belt land, so go crazy, build as many houses as you'd like.

Yes

Representation ID: 90104

Received: 22/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Richard Hewitt

Support

Yes

Representation ID: 90174

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Simon Fox

Potential with other prior development in the area to become a self sustaining community, but also with immediate and easy access to the M40 corridor, which offers potential for both Commerce and commuters.
With improved local bus services could provide easy access to main line Leamington station offering multiple alternate destinations, including fast services to London.