Yes

Representation ID: 85947

Received: 10/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Anthony Winters

We would like to see more retirement homes built around the village of Bishops Tachbrook.

No

Representation ID: 85957

Received: 10/01/2025

Respondent: Mrs Claire Broader

Traffic along Lionheart Avenue, Europa Way and Oakley Wood Road is already at capacity and will only increase as the number of students at Oakley School increases. Building in this location will also hem in the proposed country park, destroy already limited wildlife habitats and is against the agreement of the residents of Bishops Tachbrook village.

Yes

Representation ID: 86160

Received: 12/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Anthony Winters

We do have an interest as we own land at Lowhill, south of Oakley Wood Road.
Our land is less than 400 metres from St. Chad's Church which used to be the Centre of the Parish of Bishops Tachbrook.
I would like to question why Village development is allowed to the North and West, towards Warwick and Leamington, but not towards the South and East.
I have previously suggested more Retirement Homes within the Village.
Bishops Tachbrook will no longer be a Village in the Parish of St .Chad's it will become a suburb of Warwick and Leamington.

No

Representation ID: 86248

Received: 17/01/2025

Respondent: Michelle McHugh

This development is unsustainable - there has already been significant development in this area in recent years. The road network cannot cope and the public services cannot cope. SG10 is land that is opposite the Bishop Tachbrook Country Park which will significantly limit the environmental and social benefits of the Country Park. It will also significantly affect a Grade II listed building and see land than has been farmed since the Doomsday Book being developed on. It would be far better for the Country Park to be extended onto the other side of the Brook.

No

Representation ID: 86541

Received: 28/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Rory Hawkins

Leamington and the surrounding areas simply don't have the road infrastructure to cope with additional housing so close to the town centre. A significant amount of housing has already been added in the south of Leamington/Warwick which has caused a significant increase in congestion in getting in/out/around the the local area during peak hours/weekends. Given the location of the M40, getting in/out of south Leamington is already quite challenging at those time as well, without adding more traffic. New housing would be better suited in new the new settlement format where it won't add to the already overloaded infrastructure.

Yes

Representation ID: 86557

Received: 28/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Peter Bridgewater

Reduces travel time and pollution by keeping development to the borders of already developed areas.

No

Representation ID: 86811

Received: 30/01/2025

Respondent: Mr GERALD KELLY

Consider travel and the effect on rural environment

No

Representation ID: 87029

Received: 03/02/2025

Respondent: Sonia Takyar

Not happy due to concern for Flooding, Facilities being overstretched and Anti Social Behaviour

Yes

Representation ID: 87343

Received: 08/02/2025

Respondent: Cllr Andrew Day

Oakley Wood Road should be the eastern boundary of this proposed site. This provides a clear edge to the development that reflects the use of the farm land, enabling a cohesive community development that is not split by a busy road.

Significant contribution should be made to the extension of the Tach Brook Country park, respecting the BTNDP. The TBCP extension to include Windmill Hill and all land on southern bank of the brook up to established east / west public footpath.

Yes

Representation ID: 87498

Received: 09/02/2025

Respondent: mrs susan morris

Land here is the correct side of leamington for the supermarkets, train station and motorway links.

No

Representation ID: 87525

Received: 09/02/2025

Respondent: Michaelina Jakala

I do not support - too much development with too little infrastructure.

No

Representation ID: 87646

Received: 09/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Richard Grey

This proposal represents urban sprawl over a vast area making Bishops Tatchbrook a suburb within a huge area of low density development on open farmland around much of Warwick and Leamington. There is also no rail connection here encouraging much growth in road transport and resultant congestion.

Yes

Representation ID: 87906

Received: 12/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Adam Ellerington

This area can be supported by local infrastructure and amenities.

No

Representation ID: 87923

Received: 12/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Simon Rothwell

- Development/Housing will destroy the historic nature of this area. The largest white area contained within SG10 includes privately owned woodland, fields and 3 historic houses several hundred years old. One house is listed and is the only surviving Tithe Barn in Warwickshire
-North of SG10 is the new Country Park, building on SG10 will then mean the Country Park will then surrounded on ALL sides by development/housing thereby removing any countryside views for park visitors
-SG10 has been farmed since the Domesday book (1086) and includes 1000 year-old public footpath
-Badgers set on north boundary of SG10

Yes

Representation ID: 87991

Received: 13/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Simon Quantrill

Yes as its urban.

Yes

Representation ID: 87999

Received: 13/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Simon Quantrill

Yes as urban

No

Representation ID: 88136

Received: 13/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Anne Parry

Significant harm to the character of the landscape and increasing traffic congestion to JLR and Aston Martin on B4100 with additional traffic impacts on neighbouring villages. Lack of rail connectivity.

No

Representation ID: 88170

Received: 14/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Rozanne Harris

Although SG10 benefits from being close to the main road network it is already a nightmare to travel into Leamington this way. This has only become more difficult with the ongoing new build locations on the south of Leam. Its a no go driving area at peak times.

Yes

Representation ID: 88242

Received: 14/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Ida Marjorie Brown

Yes as per my comments on SG09

No

Representation ID: 88343

Received: 15/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Barrie Hayles

The Planning Inspectorate dismissed an appeal to build on land south of Mallory Road, Bishop's Tachbrook in 2014, stating there would be serious harm to the character and appearance of the village, and it would undermine much work of the PC/Neighbourhood Plan Group. The identity of Bishop's Tachbrook as a compact rural settlement would be eroded. Subsequent to the Planning Inspector's Decision, considerable building development has taken place in accordance with the parish local plan. There should be no attempt to contradict the Planning Inspector's decision concerning this land.

Yes

Representation ID: 88625

Received: 17/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Jerry Corless

N/A

No

Representation ID: 88729

Received: 17/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Darren Quinney

Bishops Itchington is already heaving under pressure of lack of investment. Council's only priority is to keep building (I'd wager none of councillors will be effected themselves or local areas). It's so disheartening to the damage you do to local area all in the name of greed.

No

Representation ID: 88922

Received: 18/02/2025

Respondent: Miss Joanne Bailey

It is already difficult to pull out of the B4087 onto the B4100 & similarly the volume of traffic using the B4087 into Wellesbourne at peak periods often sees traffic queuing beyond the village boundary - this will further add to the congestion.

Yes

Representation ID: 89037

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sara Bird

Good access to existing infrastructure and transport options

Yes

Representation ID: 89520

Received: 20/02/2025

Respondent: Miss Emily Carleton

Non green belt so please go ahead!

Yes

Representation ID: 89729

Received: 21/02/2025

Respondent: Compton Verney

n/a

No

Representation ID: 90087

Received: 22/02/2025

Respondent: Catherine Hewson

River Avon and tributaries LWS

Yes

Representation ID: 90351

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Nico Devocelle

Access to motorway

No

Representation ID: 90384

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Jayne Jones

This area is at risk of merging with other devleopment, and if distinction needed, no further devleopemtn

No

Representation ID: 90583

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Warwick Town Council

Constitutes overdevelopment and should not be expanded further.