No

Representation ID: 86028

Received: 11/01/2025

Respondent: Mrs Helen Rhys-Taylor

Proposal is to close to the Holy well area. Not enough infrastructure in Southam to cope with expansion. River floods very often by the Holy Well. The fields either side of the Holy well are one of the only areas in Southam used for dog walkers. The holy well area is a huge historical site for Southam which brings lots of visitors. There are other areas of Southam that are more suitable for housing development such as by the bypass/Daventry Road area.

No

Representation ID: 86029

Received: 11/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Tristan Taylor

The fields to either side of the holy well walk are of historical significance and bring lots of visitors to the town. The proposed build from welsh road west is marked to go all the way down to the river, thus disturbing the natural spring which feeds the holy well and could therefore destroy the feature. The holy well walk is an area of outstanding natural beauty and an important area for the mental and physical wellbeing of Southam residents` and pets therefore building here would ruin the aesthetic of the area. I implore you to reconsider this proposed area.

No

Representation ID: 86030

Received: 11/01/2025

Respondent: Caroline Piper

Increase in traffic, pollution and congestion. Loss of amenity land.

Yes

Representation ID: 86500

Received: 27/01/2025

Respondent: Mrs C Dempster

Spread out the development

Other

Representation ID: 86559

Received: 28/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Peter Bridgewater

There is a danger that developing Southam could encourage this to merge into Leamington in future

Yes

Representation ID: 86727

Received: 29/01/2025

Respondent: Miss Claire Whitehouse

Could give boost to Southam. Facilities are good, transport networks etc are good. Good for local businesses and might encourage new ones.

Yes

Representation ID: 86812

Received: 30/01/2025

Respondent: Mr GERALD KELLY

Southam is already a very built up area but has the infrastructure and employment in the area.

No

Representation ID: 87004

Received: 02/02/2025

Respondent: Mr William Whittaker

The developments to the west of Southam on Leamington road and Welsh road, is not suitable for development as it has inadequate infrastructure and on/around land of historical importance. Planning permission on Leamington Road has been previously refused. I strongly object to these developments.

Yes

Representation ID: 87034

Received: 03/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Judith Corless

south has good road links but it will need facilities updating and new schools etc.

Yes

Representation ID: 87254

Received: 07/02/2025

Respondent: Stockton Parish Council

Na

Yes

Representation ID: 87346

Received: 08/02/2025

Respondent: Cllr Andrew Day

Sustainable development

No

Representation ID: 87527

Received: 09/02/2025

Respondent: Michaelina Jakala

I do not support - too much development with too little infrastructure. HS2 causing massive disruption to life and the environment. We do not need anything more.

Yes

Representation ID: 87993

Received: 13/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sharon Quantrill

Not greenbelt

Yes

Representation ID: 88000

Received: 13/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Simon Quantrill

Ye as its not in greenbelt

Yes

Representation ID: 88137

Received: 13/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Anne Parry

No objection

Yes

Representation ID: 88172

Received: 14/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Rozanne Harris

SG12 is either already in or directly adjacent to a highly populated area. The road infrastructure is already in place

Other

Representation ID: 88203

Received: 18/01/2025

Respondent: Richard Clarke

The proposed development areas in Southam lack a sustainable community vision and would severely impact residents, even with just 25% of them utilised. The plans would almost double the town's size without addressing necessary infrastructure. Development along the Stowe Valley flood plain threatens attractive green spaces and risks flooding new homes. Additionally, the inclusion of Wood St car park, a vital community asset for local businesses, and the Factory Shop, which serves an important role, would further harm the town's vitality.

Yes

Representation ID: 88245

Received: 14/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Ida Marjorie Brown

Absolutely 100% - logical infill and good for the town to bring business and housing. Only concern I have is the transport links to encourage businesses other than "min. wage" "box shifter type business" to locate there.

Yes

Representation ID: 88628

Received: 17/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Jerry Corless

N/A

Other

Representation ID: 88957

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Cllr Nigel Rock

I do not agree with this cluster being included in the plan as set out.

No

Representation ID: 89303

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Rebecca Mitchell

- Unacceptable loss of the only car park in the centre of Southam, which will undoubtedly have an impact on local businesses, Including banks, post office, shops, pharmacy,etc. How do you expect the people from the villages around Southam to get to the centr and park? In Stockton, for example, there isn't even a pavement to walk to Southam, therefore we are forced to take the car.

- Where is the plan to increase local services ? You are doubling Southam size, what about the GPs? And the NHS dentists? Schools? Police? Etc etc

No

Representation ID: 89352

Received: 20/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Peter Shillcock

Southam has doubled in size and its character is now being lost. Whilst I support some limited development, this should be to the North West and South West of the town as it provides better links and accessibility to amenities/schools. The site to the North East is totally unacceptable due to:- flooding at the bottom of the site and development will make this worse; its non-connectivity to the town with the by-pass causing major safety issues for pedestrians; traffic flow accessibility into this site and it was taken out of the last SDC development plan as a recognised green space.

No

Representation ID: 89430

Received: 20/02/2025

Respondent: Liberal Democrat Group (Stratford District councillors)

Southam has has unprecedented growth in the last few years - no rail access and growth has been overwhelmingly dependent on car and road - infrastructure has been lacking - Wood Street car park as development is unacceptable and would affect the vibrancy of the town.

Yes

Representation ID: 89522

Received: 20/02/2025

Respondent: Miss Emily Carleton

Non green belt land so get building!

Yes

Representation ID: 89730

Received: 21/02/2025

Respondent: Compton Verney

n/a

Yes

Representation ID: 89787

Received: 21/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Julian Sanders

Access to good road connections to the north and south of the area.
Local employment opportunities
Good rail links for those commuting further afield - Banbury, Oxford, London, Birmingham
Helps to the pressure off Stratford Upon Avon of increased traffic congestion, pollution and urban sprawl
Gives opportunity to build new schools, amenities and infrastructure

No

Representation ID: 90082

Received: 22/02/2025

Respondent: Catherine Hewson

Long Itchinghton Quarry LWS and River Itchen PLWS

No

Representation ID: 90328

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Miss Julia Gibson

N/A

Other

Representation ID: 90385

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Jayne Jones

I do not know this area well enough to offer an informed opinion

Yes

Representation ID: 90427

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sheetal Tailor

Reasons:
1. Good job opportunities
2. Good existing road connections
3. HS2 could offer links to other regions
4. Reduce congestion in Stratford upon Avon
5. Housing here likely to have least impact on environment and preserve greenbelt land