No

Representation ID: 90593

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Angela Williamson

No exceptional circumstances to release land from Green Belt. Topography will make utility and infrastructure provision financially prohibitive, especially without unreasonable impact on existing landscape, community and residents. Roads currently designated as dangerous and already subject to lengthy and ongoing representation from residents to the council regarding volume and speed of traffic. Not an enterprise hub, residents would need to travel and commute out of area, putting increased pressure on already very busy local roads. Sewerage and flooding are also already issues, indicating drainage and sewers are unable to cope with increased demand.

Yes

Representation ID: 90643

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Alice Smith

This site is the perfect site for inclusion in the SWLP preferred options given the existing road infrastructure and proximity to nearby towns.

No

Representation ID: 90844

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Shannon Moore

Our roads are already congested , breaking up with current traffic, many roads in this area are frequently flooded. Services are already overstretched. Housing already planned and agreed by neighbouring authorities are causing even greater problems on the roads around Wood End, Tamworth in Arden and Earlswood. The train station has limited scope - single line, no potential for taking much traffic off the roads. This area is somewhere for walkers, horse- riders, cyclists come to enjoy. The rural nature of the villages is being eroded.

Yes

Representation ID: 91058

Received: 25/02/2025

Respondent: Julian Brown

Yes, ideal as per previous comments - good location for housing and business due to location to infrastructure.

No

Representation ID: 91126

Received: 25/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs liz jackson

within greenbelt

No

Representation ID: 91446

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Lucia Restall Orr

The proposal will impact the following Local Wildlife Sites: River Alne LWS, Round Wood and Long Wood LWS, Grove Wood PLWS and Grotton Hill Wood LWS

Yes

Representation ID: 91962

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Mr James OShea

This is a location that is in close proximity to good highways and rail infrastructure and employment centres.

Yes

Representation ID: 92329

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Harbury Parish Council

not quite as good as A1 as further from the train station but still a suitable location

Yes

Representation ID: 92928

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Ed Molloy

Punching a hole in the green belt for a new development is preferable to towns and villages sprawling into each other.

No

Representation ID: 93518

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Bernard Davis

This area is far to small to form the basis of a self-contained sustainable location. It is in the green belt with no "exceptional circumstances"

Yes

Representation ID: 93708

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Christopher Bennett

The proximity to the motorways M40/M42 support this location, along with the existing railway station at Wood End. Housing developments alongside motorway corridors are already established elsewhere nationally and because of the motorway the countryside here, whilst valuable, is less pristine and less ecologically important than other sites under consideration. The site would also be convenient to commute to Birmingham and Solihull for employment

Yes

Representation ID: 94026

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mr William Senior

Very well connected site. Ample room for development

Yes

Representation ID: 94577

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Tanworth Educational Fund

Agent: Hancock Town Planning

Hancock Town Planning Ltd represents the Tanworth Educational Foundation (TEF), which owns land assessed as Site 238 in the Housing and Economic Land Availability Assessment. TEF supports the new settlement A2 and the inclusion of Site 238, highlighting its availability, proximity to sustainable transport options, and existing community facilities. The HELAA's constraint score for Site 238 is challenged, particularly regarding educational needs and agricultural use. TEF argues that the site has low visual sensitivity and suggests that the area near the electricity line can support biodiversity gains without reducing developable space.

Other

Representation ID: 94765

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Kineton Parish Council

We have insufficient knowledge of the location from which to make an informed comment

No

Representation ID: 95100

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Rob Way

The proposed development site is unsuitable due to its undulating and sensitive landscape within the Green Belt, with significant ecological and historical value. The area lacks adequate infrastructure and utilities, making development financially prohibitive. Current infrastructure, including Wood End Station, is limited, offering only one train per hour and experiencing frequent flooding. The road network consists of country lanes prone to surface water flooding and congestion.

No

Representation ID: 95384

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Linda Synge

I wish to object to the proposed developments around our villages. I live in Kineton but have strong links to Tanworth-in-Arden and Wellesbourne. While I've seen new housing benefit local shops and communities, these developments would transform our villages into towns without the necessary services. The increased traffic, especially in Kineton, would create significant issues at narrow junctions. Additionally, the Labour Party's manifesto promised housing on brownfield sites, yet these proposals target green fields, which would permanently damage the natural environment. I urge a reconsideration of land around existing towns for housing, as South Warwickshire's villages should remain distinct.

Yes

Representation ID: 95456

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Hannah Molloy

Better to put an isolated hole in the Green Belt near transport links than induce sprawl of larger towns towards each other.

No

Representation ID: 95529

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Allan Stewart

The land is clay and holds a very high water content for at least 3 months of the winter. Building on this land would have a considerable impact on the water table and run off during the winter months and/or periods of heavy rain.

Yes

Representation ID: 95532

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Stoford Developments Ltd

Location has the potential for rail station connectivity. Additional land adj to the M42 could be allocated to serve strategic employment needs. Site A2 could also assist in meeting unmet housing needs from Redditch/Bromsgrove.

No

Representation ID: 95632

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Suzanne Hotten

Unnecessary development on Green Belt land

No

Representation ID: 95634

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Ian Clarke

The Government and local authorities should be developing policies to bring under-used existing dwellings (ABNBs, second homes, etc) into the housing market rather than developing on green belt and rural land.

Other

Representation ID: 96016

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: mr william tansey

Possibly - if no other land to the west of Redditch can be identified which sits outside of the greenbelt.

Yes

Representation ID: 96269

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Michael Coughlan

This site is within traveling distance to Birmingham and Redditch where there are job opportunities and many amenities.

No

Representation ID: 96666

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mr David Birch

I Object because it is Green Belt Land for Farming / Local nature / Hedges / Wood Land . This over Development . Infrastructure is total unsuitable for the increase in Population in that area .The traffic flow would increase to unmanageable levels on the present lanes in and around the local vicinities .On the A4177 into Warwick / Leamington / M40 . already at capacity in rush hours. New junctions would be required at the intersection B4439 / A4177 / Brownley Green Lane. Hatton Railway Station would require a Larger car park .New Schools ,

Other

Representation ID: 96776

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Alcester Town Council

Alcester Town Council, Arrow with Weethley Parish Council, Kinwarton Parish Council, Wixford Parish Council and Great Alne Parish Council (together referred to as Alcester Parishes Group or ‘APG’) has no comment.

No

Representation ID: 96819

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Richard Le Page

Site within Green Belt

Yes

Representation ID: 96942

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Margaret Jeffery

N/A

No

Representation ID: 97445

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Andrew Gaston-Ferrett

My comments are the same for Wood End and Tanworth.
In appropriate site, significant degradation of the environment, no infrastructure and would change the area beyond recognition.

Yes

Representation ID: 97841

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Gary Jeffery

Good transport links

No

Representation ID: 98346

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Daine Davis

This area is far too small to form the basis of a self-contained sustainable location. It is in the green belt with no "exceptional circumstances"