No

Representation ID: 93282

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Samantha Perry-Evans

This is such a beautiful area of green space and farm land and will spoil the environment whilst putting huge pressure on old warwick road and Birmingham road

Yes

Representation ID: 93294

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Duncan Taylor

This meets the criteria
PD1 Spatial Growth Priority Area
PD 12 Location for employment growth
Good rail access
Good bus access

No

Representation ID: 93311

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Alison Soutter

This land is green belt which has has always served the purpose of separating the settlement of Hatton from warwick. It provides home to diverse wildlife and native trees.
This site is located across the Grand union canal and railway. Small lanes (Station road, Dark Lane, Ugly Bridge Road) provide vehicle access across these. The infrastucture to support heavy traffic including large construction vehicles simply does not exist and access to this land will always be resticted.
The railway service at Hatton is very limited with no scope for expansion. A new settlement based on current transport links is misguided.

No

Representation ID: 93318

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Cllr David Armstrong

Hatton Station suffers from the same issues as Kingswood, it is small, lacks parking, and the rail line is already at capacity according to WCC’s Rail Strategy. The station geography makes it very difficult to provide substantial expansion, in platform length or parking. Without railway improvement, a settlement here would be car dependent, causing traffic issues into Warwick and breaking the 20-minute neighbourhood principles. The site is in the Green Belt and would lead to effective expansion of Warwick town.

No

Representation ID: 93363

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Ian Michael Hayes

The land is all greenbelt and should remain so.
The road infrastructure around the area is made up of country lanes andis not capable of supporting significant additional traffic.
There are very few local facilities.
The rail link that was the key logic for the council to approach the landowner, cannot be developed to the size and capacity that is anticipated from the landowners planning team.
Provision of suitable utilities will be hugely expensive.

No

Representation ID: 93366

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Warwick District Council

The proposed development at site B1 fundamentally undermines the core visions of the South Warwickshire Local Plan. The site's lack of connectivity, inadequate infrastructure, and detrimental environmental impact make it an unsuitable location for development. I urge the council to reconsider this proposal and prioritize sustainable development that genuinely benefits the entire South Warwickshire region.

No

Representation ID: 93373

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Daryl Kerin

B1 to be excluded. 1) Within the Green belt

No

Representation ID: 93398

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Ewa Kerin

Green Belt to be protected

No

Representation ID: 93404

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Norton Lindsey Parish Council

Norton Lindsey Parish Council does not believe that settlement location ‘B1 - ‘Land at Hatton’ should be included within the new plan. There are several reasons that this is the case – in particular the impact on the green belt and local health and education services.

The most significant potential impact that will affect the Parish of Norton Lindsey directly is of increased traffic on the local rural road network. The impact of this development on this network would be significant and, without substantial mitigation, disastrous. Significant intrusive highway and traffic calming measures would need to be put in place.

Yes

Representation ID: 93432

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Denise Holroyde

Warwick Parkway station is already operational. There is land available for housing and businesses.

No

Representation ID: 93443

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Teresa Hayes

Loss of Green Belt, ancient woodland, essential productive farmland. Loss of natural habitats and increase in light pollution. Increase in carbon emissions during and after construction. Inadequate infrastructure due to narrow roads , dangerous junctions and subsequent increase in carbon emissions due to increase in essential car usage, delivery and construction vehicles. The railway station access is narrow and dangerous. The carpark is small with no room to expand. The rail service is at full capacity, infrequent and unreliable for commuters thereby increasing car dependency. Warwick Hospital has stated that it cannot cope with current demand. Emergency services will struggle.

No

Representation ID: 93460

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Gordon Barnard

Site B1: Hatton
1. Hatton station is inadequate for the amount of people
2. this will cause people to drive to Warwick Parkway which will cause
2a traffic clogging on the narrow country roads
2b more parking issues in the village that is already a chicane due to parked cars
3. Warwick hospital already has trouble supporting the people in the area, it will collapse under the extra weight
4. Warwick schools will suffer similarly

No

Representation ID: 93498

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Amanda Barnard

Warwick hospital is already struggling to cope with the number of patients it has. The additional numbers will be untenable for it.
Hatton station is too small to cope with the extra number of passengers expected to need it, so many more cars will have drive to the next station - Hampton Magna. This will increase the traffic beyond the captivity of narrow country roads and cause severe jams and blockages in our village. More people will need to park in our village when the station car park runs out of space, causing dangerous parking in the village.

No

Representation ID: 93505

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Emma McNab

I oppose the B1 development due to several key concerns: it will worsen traffic congestion on the already busy B1477, compromise road safety, and strain local infrastructure. The development encroaches on protected Green Belt and Canal areas, threatening local businesses, tourism, and vital green spaces. Its scale is incompatible with the rural character of the countryside, drastically changing the area’s landscape. It also risks damaging local ecosystems, wildlife habitats, and protected trees. Additionally, the influx of new residents will burden public services, including schools, healthcare, and utilities, which are already under pressure

No

Representation ID: 93523

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Bernard Davis

This area is far to small to form the basis of a self-contained sustainable location. Its location close to Warwick will mean that it remains a satelite of its larger neighbour. The site is divided by the railway and canal. The rural nature of the canal with all its leisure facilities will be ruined. The site is in the green belt with no "exceptional circumstances"

No

Representation ID: 93535

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Amanda Barnard

Site B1 Hatton
Warwick hospital is already struggling to cope with the number of patients it has. The additional numbers will be untenable for it. Hatton station is too small to cope with the extra number of passengers expected to need it, so more cars will have drive to the next station - Warwick Parkway. This will increase the traffic beyond the captivity of narrow roads and cause severe jams and blockages in Hampton Magna. More people will need to park in our village when the station car park runs out of space, causing dangerous parking in the village

Yes

Representation ID: 93561

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Jon Redhead

The area at Hatton is near perfect for a new settlement as it has fantastic access to transport links including a rail network Station, and major arterial road connection, as well as much employment in close proximity. Close Green Belt land would not be destroyed, and more recent housing developments fairly close by, have proved this. The cycling aspect could be factored in, as the road network could accept the modifications as required.

No

Representation ID: 93765

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mr William Campbell

This countryside is a valuable local resource to the community. We should protect our greenbelt areas.
Whilst some small development to improve access to housing to meet needs is required, the scale should be of appropriate proportion.

No

Representation ID: 93766

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Carla Smith

Went to Warwick A&E in 02/25–no seats free in waiting room, was there for hours, dr examined me stood in the corridor, due to lack of space.
Birmingham Road is often backed up headed east toward Warwick/A46–often 2 miles past Hatton Arms Pub.
Inappropriate to develop Green Belt.
It is already difficult to get a GP appointment at Priory.
We are applying for 6th Form 2025, and two have said that they’re unprecedentedly oversubscribed. One issued us with an early rejection, citing the number of applicants this year, despite our student having the required predicted grades for entry.

Yes

Representation ID: 93774

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Minhaz Ali-Bache

it is suitable because it is
PD1 Spatial Growth Priority Area
PD 12 Location for employment growth

No

Representation ID: 93843

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Christopher Bennett

This site is valuable green belt, the area is unspoilt, with pristine countryside, including a strategically important long-established dairy farm. This all should not be lost. There is no advantage in terms of infrastructure, insufficient power and land drainage, country lanes which cannot support any increase in traffic and there is no access to the M40. The B4439 is completely unsuitable. As a narrow and hilly road with sharp bends and dips, greater traffic use would be dangerous. There are insufficient community facilities for retail, health or education, no employment opportunities locally and Hatton station is unsuitable to be expanded.

No

Representation ID: 93864

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Judith Molina

The access to Hatton is narrow lanes with bends, already with traffic, horses, bicycles and dog walkers, there are no footpaths and no lighting, with thousands more cars it would be gridlocked and with no work or schools locally everyone would have to commute. To make access viable would destroy hedgerows, wildlife and productive farmland. Our farmers are struggling already, we need to help and support them and encourage local food production for the sake of our health and the environment.

No

Representation ID: 93975

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sue Scurrah

A development of the proposed size would totally change the nature of the area, adversly affecting wildlife habitats, impacting food production through loss of farm land, reducing access to the countryside for leisure with all the benefits that brings, and add to further congestion on already overused roads.

No

Representation ID: 94013

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mr William Senior

It is absurd that B1 has made it this far through the process. (1) Travel infrastructure is completely inadequate and could never be developed to support any scale of building above 200 homes, let alone many thousands e.g. the A4177 and B4439 roads both regularly had 300+ car queues in both directions for many hours each day when just 150 homes were being built recently at Union View (Hatton Park) (2) This is will destroy the habitats of thousands of animals and significantly damage the planet, adding to global climate crisis. (3) This is farmland critical for UK's food security.

No

Representation ID: 94027

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mr John Clayton

the effect of additional housing in this location will make travel to Warwick and the M40 much more difficult. It is already a problem with the existing development of Union View. The Green Belt must be maintained to protect the environment which provides habitat for wild life and the maintenance of mental well being for those local people, who currently enjoy it.

No

Representation ID: 94076

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Mark Horton

Hatton already takes a huge amount of traffic with the more rural communities travelling through to access the motorway network, Warwick, Stratford and Leamington. At peak times Hatton becomes grid-locked adding 15-20 minutes to a short journey. The proposal to add so many new residential properties will make this issue worse.
Much of the road infrastructure surrounding Hatton is rural roads. These roads are already dangerous places to be without the additional volume of traffic this development will inevitably cause.

No

Representation ID: 94079

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Sally Rose

I object to building 8,000 homes around Hatton railway station. This would add approx 16,000 cars to our roads, leading to:
Traffic Congestion
Air Pollution: Increased emissions harming public health.
Noise Pollution: Higher noise levels affecting residents' quality of life.
Public Health Concerns: Exacerbating respiratory and cardiovascular conditions.
The suggestion that residents will primarily use the railway as a mode of transport is unfounded. Surveys indicate multiple barriers to this statement, such as high ticket prices.
Lane Farm has been worked over many years, a sustainable source of food and employment how can you justify building here instead of elsewhere?

No

Representation ID: 94147

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Lily Bothamley

I travel regularly to the Hatton area to visit family. I am extremely concerned about the impact on the local roads with the proposed development as the majority of traffic from the proposed site will lead to the Hockley Road, Birmingham Road junction causing severe traffic congestion. I am unable to travel by train or bus to the area as the local transport is limited.
When visiting the area I enjoy the walks through the greenbelt land and note that most is farmed land. I am concerned about the impact on the food production in the area for future generations.

Yes

Representation ID: 94193

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Helena Flisowski

This site has good transport links, M40, A46 and A4177 and is close to amenities in Warwick

Yes

Representation ID: 94198

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Helena Flisowski

Hatton would be a suitable site as it has good transport links M40, A46 and A4177. Hatton is near to Warwick town centre and the new settlement would add vibrancy to the town , bringing more income for shops and other businesses.