No

Representation ID: 90360

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Robin Barnard

Land should not be used for housing as it’ll compromise environmental sustainability, agricultural productivity, and natural ecosystems. Additionally, excessive housing developments in this area will contribute to climate change through higher carbon emissions and water consumption. Preserving open spaces ensures ecological balance, flood control, and recreational areas for communities. Poorly planned housing will also strain infrastructure, leading to traffic congestion and resource depletion which is already an issue with JLR. Prioritising smart, sustainable land use helps maintain environmental health and long-term resilience for future generations.

No

Representation ID: 90980

Received: 25/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Philip Newman

The roads are too congested, the drainage is poor...flooding has occurred many times in the past but most importantly unless there is a guarantee of a re-instatement of the Railway Station and a significantly improved bus services (7 days a week)...this is a non starter

No

Representation ID: 91066

Received: 25/02/2025

Respondent: Julian Brown

Disagree.

Yes

Representation ID: 91130

Received: 25/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs liz jackson

outside of greenbelt

No

Representation ID: 91364

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Norman Thomas

F2 is unsuitable for housing development and does not satisfy any of the "5 overarching principles" of the plan.
The surrounding roads are poor, the proposed area partly covers the flood plain of the River Itchen, public transport connectivity is poor, the local domestic water supply system is already at its limit and unreliable, the local primary schools are full, there are no local facilities.
Within the area, there is a well established dairy farm - what would happen to this?
As well as the river flood plain, the local roads are also subject to frequent flooding.

No

Representation ID: 91382

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Dragos Trancan

No more housing plans around Bishops Itchington! The infrastructure can't handle more cars and more people, there's only 1 school and cannot provide enough places for all the children. The water pipes keep on bursting, with more house and more people this will happen more often. Traffic can be horrendous at rush hour, far too few shops, not enough parking!

No

Representation ID: 91453

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Lucia Restall Orr

The proposal will impact the following Local Wildlife Sites: Deppers Bridge Meadow PLWS

No

Representation ID: 91483

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Lauren Hutchcox

It will significantly increase traffic around the area we live. We moved here for a small village community not to become part of a town! We moved out of Warwick/ Leamington for a quieter village life

Yes

Representation ID: 91970

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Mr James OShea

This is a relatively suitable and sustainable location with close proximity to main highways and rail infrastructure.

No

Representation ID: 92142

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Peter Scaife

Traffic from this development accessing M40 J12 - Station Road through Bishops Itchington will not cope

Yes

Representation ID: 92147

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Dr Deanna Fernie

Non-Green Belt, close proximity to industry at Gaydon, and motorway access. Also at sufficient distance from existing conurbations.

No

Representation ID: 92344

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Harbury Parish Council

there is poor rail/road infrastructure here, and would merge Bishop's Itchington, Ladbroke and Deppers Bridge.

No

Representation ID: 92840

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Mr James Colley

Development would extend over footpaths and bridleways, harming rural character of nearby villages (Bishop's Itchington, Depper's Bridge and Ladbroke) and harming access and enjoyment of this countryside.

Road access is poor, particularly for large vehicles, as this would have to be accessed by narrow roads that are already busy, dissuading local residents from cycling (Harbury road and B4451).

No

Representation ID: 92843

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Gillian Padgham

Do not agree with this site being included, it is unsustainable and would promote increased dependency on travel by car and would not have appropriate infrastructure to support it.

Yes

Representation ID: 92936

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Ed Molloy

A new development is preferable to towns and villages sprawling into each other.

No

Representation ID: 93200

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Kim Salmon

This development will have a significant detrimental impact to biodiversity, heritage sites, rural character, the local community of Southam & BI and associated villages. There has already seen considerable house building in the area. The site lacks all the necessary infrastructure to support such a development. There is no integrated transport infrastructure, no railway station, dependancy upon motor vehicles. J12 has become increasingly busy as is the B4451 and associated roads, BI passing traffic often creates congestion and is not designed to handle the requirements from this development. Ancient wood Itchington Holt and is inhabitants will be severely impacted.

No

Representation ID: 93201

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Kim Salmon

This development will have a significant detrimental impact to biodiversity, heritage sites, rural character, the local community of Southam & BI and associated villages. There has already seen considerable house building in the area. The site lacks all the necessary infrastructure to support such a development. There is no integrated transport infrastructure, no railway station, dependancy upon motor vehicles. J12 has become increasingly busy as is the B4451 and associated roads, BI passing traffic often creates congestion and is not designed to handle the requirements from this development. Ancient wood Itchington Holt and is inhabitants will be severely impacted.

No

Representation ID: 93293

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Claire Green

The impact on roads and amenities will be huge. There is great potential for flooding and the loss of land for farming and biodiversity will be immense.

Yes

Representation ID: 93298

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Duncan Taylor

This meets the criteria:
1) not green belt
2) not close to local nature reserves
3) not close to ancient woodland
4) not close to site of SSSI

Yes

Representation ID: 93736

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Christopher Bennett

Access to both the A423 and M40 at junction 12 is appealing for this site, along with close proximity to Southam for community resources such as leisure, retail and healthcare services (GPs). A new railway station could be developed for Bishops Itchington to serve the current and proposed new communities.

No

Representation ID: 93852

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Jennifer Patrick

This would encrouch too much on green area that is used by local villages currently for recreation walking, and cycling. It would be a strain on local villages with lack of shops, school places, doctors surgeries and lack of rural transport.

Yes

Representation ID: 93995

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Dr Sarah THOMAS

I think new settlements make sense as long as they dont merge into existing towns. this location seems appropriate to meet the needs of the area without just expanding leamington/stratford/warwick which are already struggling adn expensive. as long as appropriate amenities are also provided

Yes

Representation ID: 94199

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Helena Flisowski

Sites F2 and X2 plus X1 as well as strategic growth in the area would combined create an excellent opportunity for a vibrant community which would attract the infrastructure needed for sustainability.

No

Representation ID: 94223

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Andrew Waters

The river Itchen regularly floods into the land at Deppers Bridge as it forms a small valley. Surface water management of this site would be critical to get right and the risk of polluting the river would be significant. Despite being adjacent to the railway there is no longer any nearby station. The area is solely served by the B4452 and would be totally inadequate. The extra traffic through the village would be a major safety issue and totally inappropriate with its existing traffic-calming measures. Ladbroke would suffer similar traffic issues for commuters accessing the A423.

No

Representation ID: 94414

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Thelma Hunt

The plan to build in this area will negatively impack on all the local infrastucture, with exemely large consequences. There will be an increase in noise polution, emmissions and the local area will be overwhelmed. Schools, Dr surgeries are already booked to the limit and not coping. I was born in a local village and belive that I have the right to live in a village, not a have a town built around me. Building on Brownfield sites would be prefererable as they are already derelict and need attention Building on farmland is unforgivable.

No

Representation ID: 94483

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Joanne Salmon

This development will have a significant detrimental impact to biodiversity heritage sites rural character, the local community of Southam and BI. There has already been considerable house building in this area. The site lacks all necessary infrastructure to support such a development.There is no railway and thus dependancy upon cars. This is not sustainable in this rural location as roads will be severely impacted as they are narrow country lanes.

Other

Representation ID: 94770

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Kineton Parish Council

We have insufficient knowledge of the location from which to make an informed comment

No

Representation ID: 94877

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Fenny Compton Parish Council

This location is unsuitable for a large scale development due to its rural location. The absence of substantive transport links and the distance from critical amenities such as employment, retail and healthcare will significantly increase car journeys in the district and have a detrimental impact of neighbouring communities.

No

Representation ID: 95080

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Dr Ruth Dixon

There has already been too much development and disruption to our countryside in this due to HS2

Yes

Representation ID: 95139

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Tom Matthews

This site is a great choice, proposed development should take place here for sure!