Yes

Representation ID: 89545

Received: 20/02/2025

Respondent: Miss Emily Carleton

Non green belt you may proceed

Yes

Representation ID: 89812

Received: 21/02/2025

Respondent: Mr SIMON BEACHAM

Leamington and the surrounding area around Whitnash are more suitable with their proximity to the M40, although ques are innevitable as they already exist before the works have commenced. Pedestrian and cycle paths are already in existence to link with Leamington. Leamington has a good accessible train station.

Yes

Representation ID: 90169

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Hugh Darwen

Together with site X1, I believe this non-green belt area would be suitable for the development of a new settlement. The motorway is close by and there could be provision for a new junction. There is also room for building the necessary new hospital and schools. Nearby Leamington Spa railway station can be rebuilt or refurbished as needed. Building on X1 and X2 would minimise the impact on the character and biodiversity of south Warwickshire, compared with some other sites that have been offered.

Yes

Representation ID: 90308

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Elisabeth Darwen

Development at location X2 together with X1 is likely to result in less of a negative impact on South Warwickshire than would occur with the development of many of the other sites proposed. Access to the motorway network with room for a new junction possible. Close to Leamington Spa Station. Space for houses, schools and a new hospital.

No

Representation ID: 90312

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Liz Stone

n/a

Yes

Representation ID: 90638

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Alice Smith

This site is perfect for inclusion in the SWLP preferred options given the existing road infrastructure and proximity to key routes

Yes

Representation ID: 90711

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Averil Stewart

keep new development close to road infrastructure opportunites like motorways is far more sensible

Yes

Representation ID: 91072

Received: 25/02/2025

Respondent: Julian Brown

100% given its location to strategic growth sites.

Yes

Representation ID: 91132

Received: 25/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs liz jackson

outside of greenbelt

Yes

Representation ID: 91835

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Luke Russell

The impact to biodiversity and identity of surrounding villages will be less than alternative proposed sites. The cost of mitigation of flood risk and traffic upgrades will be cheaper than alternative sites.

Yes

Representation ID: 91944

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Kitten Von mew

You can easily provide good public transport

Yes

Representation ID: 91973

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Mr James OShea

This is a relatively suitable and sustainable location with close proximity to main highways and rail infrastructure.

Yes

Representation ID: 92078

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Robin Broughton

Preferable to others around Leamington

Yes

Representation ID: 92155

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Dr Deanna Fernie

This is suitable as Non-Green Belt, with good motorway access. The new settlement would be near the centres of Leamington and Warwick, with train connections to London, Banbury and Oxford, and would therefore be sustainable both in terms of transport infrastructure and economically for job access.

No

Representation ID: 92193

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Edward Wilson

The infrastructure will not match the schooling, medical, transport,etc needs which are already under immense pressure. It also covers areas of Heritage - the Roman camp which conflicts with both the tourism and heritage aspirations.

No

Representation ID: 92352

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Harbury Parish Council

currently the football ground, and earmarked for a traveller's site. No public transport access, including rail within easy reach. Risks being an extension of Whitnash rather than a separate settlement. Detrimental impact on nearby historic sites

Yes

Representation ID: 92377

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Nigel Briggs

Close to good transport links and especially to employment opportunities

No

Representation ID: 92558

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Miss Madeleine Cox

X2 should be discounted as it fails on sustainability, deliverability and infrastructure grounds. This area does not have sufficient infrastructure or traffic provision and it is currently under multiple ownership. It would have a detrimental impact on nature and would effectively create urban sprawl in the place of prime agricultural land. The village of Bishop's Tachbrook is already under siege from an excessive share of local development and this would destroy its distinct identity. Disproportionate development has already been put in this area south of Leamington and it is therefore NOT the place for a new settlement in any way.

Yes

Representation ID: 92570

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Phillip Johnson

I believe that Site X2 would be highly suitable for development as a new Settlement.
A site south of Warwick/Leamington would also provide
• Easy access to main line rail station
• Easy access to hospital
• Access to existing and new local skills and jobs
• Access to Training and Education facilities
• Access to many existing retail outlets
• Direct access to M40 motorway
Site X2 does not suffer from a local network of already congested highways and single carriageway country lanes. In short, Site X2 would be straightforward to develop.

Yes

Representation ID: 92590

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Laura Johnson

I believe this site is a lot more suitable than any other options present for the following reasons:
The site is a lot closer to main railway lines, and stations that can support the increase in patrons using the railway system.
The site has easy access to the M40/M42 road systems which are capable of supporting the increase in traffic in the area.
The site has numerous local amenities available already, as well as supermarkets, shops, gyms, restaurants etc.
The site has various primary and secondary schools available already, which are large schools, on large grounds, that can support more children without the need to build as many schools.
The site has other hospitals close to it that are not as busy as the ones in Coventry/Birmingham etc.
The current road systems have already been modified and upgraded for the existing new build developments, and it would be cheaper an easier to utilise these.

No

Representation ID: 92717

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Luke Kempton

This will create an urban sprawl between Leamington and Harbury and also impact on heritage/roman sites. In addition, the traffic along the Fosse is very bad (especially due to commuters to Gaydon from the Coventry area) and this will make it a lot worse.

Yes

Representation ID: 92740

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Heidi Ambrose-Brown

This development requires less infrastructure as it has good links to established main roads. It is also close to Leamington with access to retail and employment provisions.
Bus routes are in place and could easily be extended.
It would naturally align with current developments along that stretch of land.

In terms of overall cost to bring the proposal to fruition it is the most likely to be successful in meeting targets.

Yes

Representation ID: 92752

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Raymond Joyce

X2 is ideally situated to provide housing for all the employees in the industrial and highly paid sectors in Leamington Spa, Whitnash and Warwick. It will alleviate intensity of traffic by causing journeys to disperse in all directions. Infrastructure is already in place for rail, road travel, education facilities from pre-school to 16+, mature retail outlets and healthcare.

Yes

Representation ID: 92769

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Jon Cheek

This would be a better option for develop as it would provide a more environment better option as this site is closure to the M40 and with a proposed new motorway junction would mean easier access for traffic to get to the development and prevent all the additional traffic in the historical town of Warwick

This area would could also provide the necessary infrastructure and necessary support facilities as it has been previously muted that this area could provide a new hospital facility that is much needed due to the failing and crumbling existing Warwick hospital facility.

No

Representation ID: 92827

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Aysha Cannell

For heavens sake.. let’s build on everything thing we can.. it’s already bad enough now driving on the the roads, tell you what perhaps my employer will let me start work later in the morning and finish earlier ie reducing my hrs per week as l sit in the traffic jams and all for the same money.

Yes

Representation ID: 92943

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Ed Molloy

A new development is preferable to towns and villages sprawling into each other. This area is good for extending recent development. Good transport to Commercial and Retail in the area. Not Green Belt.

Green Belt should be preserved where ever possible

No

Representation ID: 93264

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Miss Mairi Mitchell

X2 as part of the SWLP infringes on the edge of the village of Bishops Tachbrook and reduces the separation the village has from the main town of Leamington Spa reducing the heritage and distinct character of the village. Additional development goes against previous development plans which brought in the designation of tachbrook Country Park as a buffer of green space between the village and Leamington Spa’s urban sprawl. The assessment does not provide clarity on why this location is selected and does not give clear direction on how key infrastructure issues will be addressed.

No

Representation ID: 93269

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Scott Bower

X2 as part of the SWLP infringes on the edge of the village of Bishops Tachbrook and reduces the separation the village has from the main town of Leamington Spa reducing the heritage and distinct character of the village. Additional development goes against previous development plans which brought in the designation of tachbrook Country Park as a buffer of green space between the village and Leamington Spa’s urban sprawl. The assessment does not provide clarity on why this location is selected and does not give clear direction on how key infrastructure issues will be addressed.

Yes

Representation ID: 93306

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Duncan Taylor

This is a great option, and meets criteria
overlap with Strategic Growth Locations
not in Green Belt
not close to local nature reserve, SSSI or ancient woodland
close to urban business parks and industrial estates (Spatial Growth Strategy)
Good public transport links

Yes

Representation ID: 93314

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Alison Soutter

Appropriate due to current new housing adjacent to the site. Infrastructure has already been established for both construction and for increased number of residents.
Access to the site is direct.
Well placed for access to M40 as well as the towns of Warwick and Leamington which have good rail links north and south