BASE HEADER

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 102260

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Laura Jane Pearce

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

My objections to this proposed development on land labelled as B1are listed below:
1) That healthcare improvements to service this proposed development have not been
addressed. Warwick Hospital is already overwhelmed and there is no provision for any
additional hospital facilities. This will impact the whole community in a detrimental
manner long after the developers have departed. This development will completely
swamp the current medical services both at primary and hospital settings, leaving all
residents struggling healthcare services.
2) There will be a huge impact on all other infrastructure systems in the area. To
accommodate such a huge development as this proposal will require upgrades and
increases in all systems: electric, gas, water, sewage and broadband. This will be
disruptive, costly and will also have a huge ecological impact.
3) The loss of valuable pastureland which will severely impact our ability to provide food
sources for both human and agricultural use. Not to mention the obvious harm to
wildlife with the loss of swathes of green pasture land.
4) The area being considered for this development already suƯers from flooding. The
impact of the loss of this land by replacing it with concrete roads and 8000+ houses will
greatly increase the risks of flooding in this area.
5) The development proposals have suggested that Hatton Station will provide essential
travel links that are central to the proposals. However, the rail services at Hatton Station
are poor with very few services. The ability to increase this will be hampered by the lack
of land around the station to increase capacity. The access to Hatton Station is re
already challenging with a narrow access road and its proximity to the canal.
6) The roads around the area B1 are not suitable for such a huge development. They are
often narrow, single track with passing points and with no pavement facilities for
pedestrians. This development would require huge infrastructure upgrades to these
roads to make them safe for all roads users. This would inevitably require many
additional land purchases from many landowners making this development very hard to
deliver on budget, on time and would require negotiating with many landowners.
7) For all these reasons, and many more, I do not believe that this is right location for this
proposed development,