BASE HEADER

No

ID sylw: 104798

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Joe Rukin

You seem to have ignored Section 13 of the NPPF and are claiming sites being 'sustainable' means that 'exceptional circumstances' exist when they don't.

You could achieve almost double the to be found target by 2050 without touching any Green belt at all.

Your criteria for declaring a site as sustainable seems to be ranking sites not by which is the most sustainable, but which is the least unsustainable.

The Sustainability Appraisal is fundamentally flawed as are the HELAA weightings given to Green Belt.

And you've just ignored the existence of HS2.