BASE HEADER

No

ID sylw: 106155

Derbyniwyd: 25/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Vickie Marks

I wish to formally object to the proposal for the construction of 8,000 new houses in the Hatton B1 area due to significant concerns regarding traffic infrastructure, negative effects on wildlife and biodiversity, and the impact on local hospitals.

The current traffic infrastructure in the Hatton B1 area is inadequate to support the expected increase in population. The addition of 8,000 new houses would lead to a substantial rise in vehicle congestion, which poses safety risks and could result in gridlock on local roads. The area lacks sufficient public transportation options, leading to an increased reliance on personal vehicles. Without necessary upgrades to roads and enhancements to public transit, the proposal will exacerbate existing traffic issues, affecting residents' daily commutes and overall quality of life. In terms of rail links, Warwick Parkway only has two platforms and Hatton Station has three, both with very limited options in terms of destinations, whereas Leamington Spa has four platforms and offers routes in many different directions, as well as having a road network with much more headroom for expansion, making housing developments around the Leamington Spa area much more viable than Hatton, and much more likely to reduce private car usage and make the utilisation of public transport a reality rather than a pipe dream.

The proposed development site includes vital habitats that support local wildlife and biodiversity. The construction of such a large number of houses would result in habitat destruction and fragmentation, threatening the survival of numerous species. The loss of green spaces not only endangers wildlife populations but also diminishes the ecological balance essential for a healthy environment. Preserving these habitats is crucial for maintaining local biodiversity and ensuring that future generations can enjoy natural green spaces and enjoy the benefits to health and mental wellbeing that these spaces currently provide.

Warwick Hospital is already operating under significant demand. The influx of thousands of new residents would put additional pressure on their services, potentially leading to longer wait times and reduced quality of care for all patients. Without corresponding investments in healthcare infrastructure, the well-being of both new and existing residents could be compromised. It is imperative that healthcare resources are adequately addressed before proceeding with such a large-scale development.

In conclusion, given the critical concerns regarding traffic infrastructure, the impact on wildlife and biodiversity, and the strain on local hospitals, I urge the planning committee to reconsider the proposal for 8,000 new houses in the Hatton B1 area. The potential negative effects on the community and environment far outweigh any perceived benefits of this development.