BASE HEADER

No

ID sylw: 106489

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Andrew Ruyssevelt

Objection to SG07 and B1.
I wish to formally object to the proposed construction of industrial, commercial, warehouse,

and distribution units at Stank’s Island (SG07). This project is disproportionate in scale and

raises concerns regarding adherence to responsible planning regulations and environmental

stewardship.

Grounds for Objection

Green Belt Protection

The Green Belt is intended to prevent urban sprawl, conserve natural landscapes, and

ensure balanced development. This project contradicts the principles set forth in national

planning regulations, which emphasize urban expansion within designated zones rather

than protected rural areas.

The National Planning Policy Framework (2023) dictates that Green Belt land should remain

untouched unless "exceptional circumstances" apply. Given that viable alternative

locations—such as designated industrial zones near the M40 and Coventry—are available,

this proposal is both unnecessary and inappropriate.

Environmental and Legislative Violations

This project endangers local ecosystems and protected wildlife habitats, breaching several

key laws, including:

• The Wildlife & Countryside Act 1981

• The Hedgerows Regulations 1997

• The Protection of Badgers Act 1992

• The Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010

• The Countryside & Rights of Way Act 2000

• The Natural Environment & Rural Communities Act 2006

In addition, the increased carbon footprint from industrial operations contravenes:

• The Climate Change Act 2008

• The Carbon Reduction Commitment (CRC) Energy Efficiency Scheme

• The Industrial Emissions Directive (IED)

• The Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2016

• The UK Emissions Trading Scheme (UK ETS)

The project also heightens flood risks by disrupting natural drainage, in direct violation of:

• The Flood and Water Management Act 2010

• The Land Drainage Act 1991

• The Water Resources Act 1991

• The Environmental Permitting (England and Wales) Regulations 2016



Traffic and Infrastructure Strain

If allowed, this development will cause an influx of HGVs, leading to:

• Elevated air and noise pollution.

• Increased congestion on already overburdened roads.

• Higher accident risks for pedestrians and cyclists.

Loss of Community Green Space

Public footpaths, bridleways, and recreational green spaces will be permanently lost,

negatively impacting local quality of life.

Conclusion

This development is both unnecessary and detrimental to the environment, infrastructure,

and community well-being. I strongly urge the council to reject this proposal in favour of

sustainable alternatives.