BASE HEADER

Other

ID sylw: 107720

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Alex Carbutt Todd

REFID-612
By the process of your own initial analysis procedure - HELAA Part A – site 612 should be sifted out of the process. As a landowner within the proposed site, we do not plan to sell and have not been consulted on our willingness to do so, which should result in a ‘Red’ score under the ownership assessment criteria. “Using the RAG approach, any site scoring one “Red” or more are considered unsuitable for development and is sifted out.”
100% of 612 is greenfield.
Both 612 and 716 have very poor overall HELAA_B scores. Especially 716, having the 37th highest score out of 672 proposed sites.
I would like it to be noted that our land has been promoted for adoption without our consent by Terrano Land & Development, and therefore we are not represented by Terrano, nor can we be treated as a single party along with the other parcels under their promotion, further reducing the cohesion of 612, SG11, and X2.


Working in the real estate industry, I appreciate the requirement for additional housing across the country. However, new development must be of good quality and the selection of new sites be held to high and consistent standards in order for future communities to be sustainable. There has already been a tremendous amount of new poor-quality development along the Harbury Lane, Europa Way, and Gallows Hill etc. which has not been supported by appropriate amenity or infrastructure upgrades, has merged with existing settlements, and has therefore resulted in a considerable negative impact on existing infrastructure and the character of the area. The volume of vehicle traffic in the Leamington and Warwick area is already unsustainable, especially during peak hours. I do not feel therefore that SG11 and X2 represent appropriate locations for residential or mixed-use development considering the character of the locale and the points raised above, especially given it is clear that X2 will not be sustainable and self-supporting, all of which are legitimate arguments based on the SWLP self-assessment criteria.