BASE HEADER

Yes

ID sylw: 107802

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Katie and Carl Jackson

Re: Opposition to Proposed Development of 52 dwellings behind the houses on Malthouse Lane in
between the Maltings and Car park (Site 600).
I am writing to formally oppose the proposed development of 52 new dwellings behind the houses on
Malthouse Lane in between the Maltings and Car park. As a resident of the area, I have significant
concerns about the negative impact this development will have on both the environment and the
community. I believe that these concerns need to be seriously considered before any planning
permission is granted.
Environmental Impact on Nearby Lakes
The development would be situated near Terry’s Pool of Earlswood Lakes, an area of significant natural
beauty. These lakes are not only an important visual asset for the area but also support local wildlife and
contribute to the overall quality of the environment. The construction and increased human activity in the
area would drastically alter the landscape, causing irreversible damage to this tranquil space and
potentially leading to long-term environmental degradation. The aesthetic and ecological damage to this
area would be unacceptable, and I strongly urge the council to reconsider the placement of such a largescale
development.
Flooding and Drainage Issues
Our area already faces considerable flooding during heavy rainfall, with many properties, including mine,
experiencing issues such as water pooling on drives and gardens. Our area already faces considerable
flooding during heavy rainfall, with many properties including mine, facing issues such as water pooling
on driveways and gardens. Our driveway and those of our neighbours frequently resemble swimming
pools, as the existing drainage system is physically incapable of managing the volume of water.
Consequently, we've had to consider installing flood prevention systems on our property.
The current drainage system is inadequate, and there are serious concerns that adding additional homes
will worsen these problems, putting additional strain on already compromised infrastructure. The impact
of runo􀆯 from 52 new properties will lead to even more frequent flooding, potentially a􀆯ecting homes and
infrastructure in the vicinity.
Strain on Local Infrastructure
The local roads are narrow and already struggle to accommodate the current level of tra􀆯ic. The
development of 52 houses would add substantial pressure to the infrastructure, leading to increased
tra􀆯ic congestion, safety concerns, and further deterioration of the already overstretched roads. The
causeway over Earlswood Lakes has seen many accidents over the last few months resulting in repairs.
The surrounding area cannot support this level of growth without substantial and costly upgrades to
roads, drainage, and other public services. Without significant improvements, this development would
severely impact the quality of life for current residents.
Loss of Vegetation and Habitat
The land designated for development currently contains valuable vegetation and wildlife habitats.
Removing these areas would lead to a loss of biodiversity and disrupt local ecosystems. It is essential
that we protect these green spaces, as they play a critical role in maintaining the environmental balance
of the area. The proposed development would contribute to habitat loss and pose a direct threat to the
wildlife that relies on these spaces.
Pollution Concerns for Nearby Lakes
With the development of 52 houses, the increased human activity and potential runo􀆯 could result in
significant pollution of the nearby lakes. The introduction of waste, chemicals, and other contaminants
could have long-term detrimental e􀆯ects on the water quality, a􀆯ecting not just the lakes but the
surrounding flora and fauna as well.
In conclusion, I strongly oppose this development based on the concerns outlined above. The
environmental, infrastructure, and social costs of this project far outweigh any potential benefits, and I
respectfully urge the council to reconsider the approval of this proposal. Earlswood is a small village
community, and the increased developments will jeopardise its unique character and charm.
Thank you for your time in considering my objections. I would appreciate of being kept informed of any
upcoming public hearings or meetings related to the planning process.