BASE HEADER

Yes

ID sylw: 107836

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Taylor Wimpey Strategic Land

Asiant : Turley

Site 573
Part B of the HELAA identifies and assesses the following constraints as “amber”
: • Site 573:
‒ Green Belt
‒ Greenfield
‒ Viability and deliverability
‒ Minerals Safeguarding
‒ Surface water (although only on a small proportion of the site)
‒ Listed buildings (only part of the site in close proximity) ‒ Local Wildlife Site (only part of the site in close proximity)
the sites (reference HMG1 and HMG2) are considered to make an overall “weak” contribution to the purposes of the Green Belt.
Having regard to the minerals safeguarding of the site, it is noted that other sites identified for potential allocation are also in safeguarding areas.
The viability and deliverability of site 573 is also noted as an amber constraint, it is unclear what the justification is for this. However, the deliverability of the site is not considered to be a constraint, in planning terms, the site is deliverable for new homes subject to its removal from the Green Belt.
On the basis set out above, the site promoted by Taylor Wimpey is considered to represent a deliverable site opportunity which could come forward early in the plan period.