BASE HEADER

Yes

ID sylw: 108513

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Emily and Andrew Cox

I strongly object to the proposed inclusion of the Land on the East side of Church
Lane, Barford, as outlined in the SWLP Preferred Options consultation. This
development is wholly inappropriate for several critical reasons, particularly regarding
its accessibility and the safety of existing residents, pedestrians, and schoolchildren in
the area. I urge the local planning authorities to reconsider the inclusion of this site and
prioritise the safety, wellbeing, and sustainability of the Barford community in line with
the objectives of the Neighbourhood Plan.

Specific Objections
1. Land on the East side of Church Lane, Barford CV35 8BX.
Inadequate and Unsafe Access
• Church Lane is a narrow, rural lane with no pavements, which is frequently used
by pedestrians, including children walking to and from school and the nearby
recreational playground.
• The proposed development would significantly increase traffic flow along this
lane, which already experiences congestion.
• Given that the lane is primarily used by walkers, the proposed development
would pose a significant safety risk to both pedestrians and drivers.
Pedestrian Safety
• The lack of pavements on Church Lane makes it particularly dangerous for
walkers, especially children who walk to school.
2
• The current infrastructure does not support the safe integration of additional
vehicular traffic, and there is a significant concern that increased traffic could
lead to accidents.
Barford Neighbourhood Plan
• The Barford Neighbourhood Plan emphasises maintaining the character of the
village and prioritising safety and sustainability.
• This development contradicts these objectives by introducing a level of traffic
and urbanisation that would disrupt the village’s established rural character and
potentially endanger the safety of residents and schoolchildren.
Impact on Local Infrastructure
• Barford already faces challenges regarding infrastructure, including roads,
public transport, and services. Adding more development without addressing
these limitations would put further strain on the village’s resources and
compromise the quality of life for its residents.

Conclusions
Development on Land on the East side of Church Lane, Barford is wholly
inappropriate for several critical reasons, particularly regarding its accessibility and the
safety of existing residents, pedestrians, and schoolchildren in the area.
I urge the local planning authorities to reconsider the inclusion of this site and prioritise
the safety, wellbeing, and sustainability of the Barford community in line with the
objectives of the Neighbourhood Plan.