BASE HEADER

I thought the whole idea was to preserve local employement why would we want to close Woodside. The wildlife impact would be a disaster and as a strong supporter RSPB and of the small town why would we want to use the last bit of land we have when there are plenty of other places with alot more surrounding rural land to use. I moved from a large Town for a better lifestyle for my son, if this development goes ahead would have to re consider living in kenilworth. This shared by local family & friends.
Lose local employment I thought we were trying to increase it in Kenilworth. Rural is not a word we can already strongly associate with Kenilworth there's hardly any green belt now - surely you can find an area that's not in Kenilworth which can better accommodate the development. Wildlife will be affected something I very much enjoy and my elderly neighbours also enjoy currently your development would destroy this.
Surely a development so close to a main road a very fast A46 would be dangerous for families with small children. We don't have the local facilities i.e. school places are already hard to get (my son couldn't get into Park Hill as my local school), insufficient utilities and road network to accommodate this development. Glasshouse lane is already a bottleneck between 730-900 due to volume of traffic using it to work/school run how can we consider further development and increase in noise & air pollution. I came to Kenilworth for a rural clean air aspect.