BASE HEADER
Gwrthwynebu
Alternative Sites Consultation
ID sylw: 43954
Derbyniwyd: 10/03/2010
Ymatebydd: Marcus LaVerne
It is vital that we keep the gap between Kenilworth and Coventry. Should not consider building on Greenfield sites before EVERY Brownfield site HAS BEEN developed.
It is already dangerous to travel along Crackley lane at times and the University's expansion plans and Coventry's own plans will cause more congestion. .
No consideration has been given to the wildlife in this area, such as the frogs that cross the road near Crackley Woods?
"Local" residents have not been properly informed about this proposal, as there has been no communication to the local Coventry residents therefore making this whole process a farce.
Questionnaire Response:
I object not only to this proposal but also to the fact that it is even being considered at all! It is vital that we keep the Kenilworth Gap between Kenilworth and Coventry exactly that. The idea that we are even considering building on Greenfield sites before EVERY Brownfield site HAS BEEN developed is outrageous.
I object on the grounds that no consideration has been given to the traffic situation in this area. It is already dangerous to travel along Crackley lane at times and when there are another 5000+ vehicles? Then bear in mind the University's expansion plans and the problems that they are already causing with traffic in the area and then consider Coventry's own expansion plans in the Cromwell lane / Tile Hill area and all you will be creating is a car park.
I also object because no consideration has been given to the wildlife in this area, such as the frogs that cross the road near Crackley Woods? And all of the other wildlife species?
I also object because not all of the "local" residents have not been properly informed about this proposal. Not one letter, email, flyer has been sent out to the local Coventry residents therefore making this whole process a farce. Is WDC about protecting Green Belt?? I think not.