BASE HEADER
Gwrthwynebu
Alternative Sites Consultation
ID sylw: 44056
Derbyniwyd: 08/04/2010
Ymatebydd: Mr Ashley Ball
I object because it's Greenbelt land and should remain as such, because the road system could not cope and would need to be developed which would also be hugely detrimental to the area and other proposed alternative sites appear to be far more sensible in comparison, as they would be less impactful on their respective surrounding areas.
I strongly object to the proposed development of Hurst Farm South for many reasons:
- This is Greenbelt land and should remain Greenbelt land. Many people, families in particular, enjoy this part of open countryside recreationally and a housing development would be hugely detrimental making the area far less attractive as a whole
- The rural travel infrastructure is already congested at various times of day and would not cope with such a development. Improvements would therefore have to be made which would again be hugely detrimental to the area
- In comparison to other sites proposed, a development of the Hurst Farm site appears to be far more damaging and it would completely change the area as it is now whereas some other proposed alternative sites are merely an expansion of existing urban areas and are therefore far less impactful.
I agree with all the other objections that have been posted for this proposed site - it simply would be awful for the area and is completely unnecessary.