BASE HEADER
Gwrthwynebu
Alternative Sites Consultation
ID sylw: 44193
Derbyniwyd: 07/04/2010
Ymatebydd: Mrs Valerie Smith
1. Flood plain.
2. Sewers around Whitnash already have problems they do not need to be exacerbated.
3. Roads around the area are already extremely busy at peak times. It is not a viable proposition to support the extra traffic.
4. Golf Lane has reach capacity for traffic. A new school in the position suggested would mean far more traffic on Golf Lane and Fieldgate Lane.
5. There is a lack of places for children to play with them often playing in the cul-de-sacs due to reasonable safety. We seem to be creating one big housing development without much relief.
Questionnaitr Response:
Sites 1a; 1b; 3; 4; 5; 6:
I have No Objection.
Site 2:
If this land were to be developed it would have an extremely damaging effect on the area.
1.It is a flood plain and there is a reason for it being so.
2. Sewers around Whitnash already have problems they do not need to be exacerbated.
3. Roads around the area are already extremely busy at key times in the day and any Bank holiday. It is not a viable proposition to support an extra 1000 houses with probably two cars per house and more children to ferry to primary schools out of the area as there are not enough suitable places locally.
4. Golf Lane has reach capacity for traffic coming and going at busy times a new school in the position suggested would mean far more traffic coming down Golf Lane and Fieldgate Lane which could not cope.
5. Because of a lack of places for children to play in this area, Fieldgate Lane at the moment attracts children playing as it is reasonably safe being a no through road. Climbing trees and being kids!! We do need places not continually full of traffic we seem to be creating one big housing development without much relief.