BASE HEADER
Gwrthwynebu
Alternative Sites Consultation
ID sylw: 45185
Derbyniwyd: 07/04/2010
Ymatebydd: R.F. Garner
The new proposals suffer from the same disadvantages as the preferred options, though perhaps to a lesser degree. I feel strongly that maximum use of brownfield land should be a paramount criterion and that development should be spread more widely across the district. I have reservations about the overall number of houses being allegedly necessary.
I believe Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council's Alternative Option to be a good alternative which deals with a number of the issues.
I object to the alternative proposals in the form put forward by the developers, except for the proposal at Kenilworth which use previously developed land.
It seems to me that the new proposals suffer from some of the same disadvantages as the preferred options, though perhaps to a lesser degree. In particular, I still feel strongly that maximum use of brownfield land should be a paramount criterion and that development should be spread more widely across the district. I have reservations about the overall number of houses being allegedly necessary.
I have had the opportunity to study the Alternative Option developed by Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council which I understand is supported by Whitnash, Barford and Budbrook. I believe this to be a well thought through alternative which deals with a number of the issues which concern myself and other local residents. I fully support it and would hope that you study it in detail as part of the current consultation.
In summary therefore:
I object to the alternative proposals in the form put forward by the developers, except for the proposal for Kenilworth Gardens and Woodside Training Centre which use previously developed land.
I fully support the Alternative Option proposed by Bishop Tachbrook Parish Council.