BASE HEADER
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 46787
Derbyniwyd: 23/07/2012
Ymatebydd: Mrs Louise Wilks
As extensively addressed in our representation to Section 7 but also addressed in our representation for Section 8; the level of Green Belt development put forward is not justified by evidence (rather than unsupported assertion in para 7.30) against the NPPF "exceptional circumstances" test; and that the Milverton site is non-compliant with NPPF guidance on (a) exploiting "well-defined boundaries" if partly developed (East)or "coalescence if West/East Milverton all developed (as WDC accept) and (b) development of rural areas - given it would destroy Grade 2 agricultural land. Sensitive environmental site issues re flooding and water (see SHLAA) are also ignored.
As extensively addressed in our representation to Section 7 but also addressed in our representation for Section 8; the level of Green Belt development put forward is not justified by evidence (rather than unsupported assertion in para 7.30) against the NPPF "exceptional circumstances" test; and that the Milverton site is non-compliant with NPPF guidance on (a) exploiting "well-defined boundaries" if partly developed (East)or "coalescence if West/East Milverton all developed (as WDC accept) and (b) development of rural areas - given it would destroy Grade 2 agricultural land. Sensitive environmental site issues re flooding and water (see SHLAA) are also ignored.