BASE HEADER
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 47653
Derbyniwyd: 26/07/2012
Ymatebydd: D. J. Payne
Object to green belt land development north of Leamington.
Assume designated after careful consideration so why is original work now being ignored? Nothing has changed since 2009 core Strategy so what justification is there to disregard this work?
Whilst understanding need for more houses, it must be carried out on brown and white field sites before consideration is given to green belt.
I am writing to show my strong objection to the new Proposed development plan on Green Belt Land in North Leamington. One can only assume that it was designated as Green Belt after careful consideration of all the relevant factors and was then included in the 2012 referred Options booklet. Why is this original work now being ignored? Nothing has changed since the 2009 Core Strategy, so what justification is there to disregard all the work that was carried out and resulted in the Green Belt Classification?
Whilst I understand that more houses have to be built, such building must be carried out on Brown and White field sites before any consideration is given to using valuable Green Belt Land.