BASE HEADER
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 47942
Derbyniwyd: 23/07/2012
Ymatebydd: Verity Pullen
Objection on the grounds that the land is used by the local community, goes against the National Planning Policy Framework, other sites exist which are not in the greenbelt and plenty of brown field sites exist which could be used instead. It was also suggested that decisions taken now would limit options in the future.
I object to the proposed development in Old Milverton and Blackdown contained in Warwick District Councils's Preferred Options for the Local plan.
This land has great recreational value to the local community. It is enjoyed by many runners, riders, walkers and cyclists.
The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) states that the Government attaches great importance to Greenbelts and that the fundamental aim of Greenbelt is to prevent urban sprawl by keeping land permanently open.
The Greenbelt in Old Milverton and Blackdown fulfils the 5 purposes of Greenbelt set out in the NPPF and therefore should remain as open Greenbelt land for ever. It
* Prevents the unrestricted sprawl of Leamington to the north
* Prevents the merging of Leamington and Kenilworth
* Helps safeguard the countryside from encroachment
* Helps preserve the setting and special character of Leamington (a
historic town)
* Helps urban regeneration, by encouraging the recycling of
derelict and other urban land
There are other sites which can be developed that are not in the Greenbelt.
These sites, which are mainly to the south of Leamington, were included in Warwick District Council's previous plan (the 2009 Core Strategy).
Employment opportunities and infrastructure already exists here, and this land should be used in preference to the Greenbelt.
The NPPF states that Greenbelt boundaries should only be altered in exceptional circumstances. As there are alternative sites, there are no exceptional circumstances which outweigh the harm caused by altering the Greenbelt boundaries in Old Milverton and Blackdown and allowing development on this land.
There are plenty of brown field sites that could be used instead. Instead of allowing another supermarker to be built at the Ford Foundry that area should have been considered for housing. Protect the countryside or we wont have any left for the next generations. Be wise about this.