BASE HEADER

I wish to object to the current plans to build on the Green Belt area north of Leamington Spa.
I understand that the fundamental aim of Greenbelt policy as set out in the Government's National Planning Policy Framework is to prevent urban sprawl by keeping land permanently open.
The Proposals as they currently stand appear to me to contradict the laid down terms of reference for such developments viz.
1. The Government's National Planning Policy Framework requires there to be "very special circumstances" for development in the Green Belt. It also requires the harm caused to the Green Belt by the development to be outweighed by the benefit of the development. According to Warwick District Council the special circumstances are that there is nowhere else for the homes to be built.
2. However, in the "2009 Core Strategy" (the previous plan adopted by Warwick District Council) land south of Leamington (not in Green Belt), was identified and is still available, for development. The assessment performed by Warwick District Council itself shows that this land is easier to develop and already has a substantial amount of infrastructure (roads etc) to support the development, and the new residents who will live there. It is close to the M40 and there are existing employment opportunities South of Leamington as well as existing out of town shopping facilities and good access to the town centres.
3. Therefore, the previous plan (the 2009 Core Strategy) provides direct evidence that there are alternative areas for development other than the Green Belt. This indicates and that the "special circumstances" put forward by Warwick District Council are invalid.
4. Warwick District Council argues that the land in the South of Leamington is not as attractive to developers because concentration of development in that area may result in the developers making less profit. Consideration of the developers' financial gain is NOT a "very special circumstance" to permit unnecessary development in the Green Belt.