BASE HEADER

I object to your Proposed Preferred Option plans, because you could have adopted those prepared in 2009 for the Core Strategy Plan, which did not require the use of Precious Green Belt Land. These previous plans would have been much less expensive as they did not require the extravagance of a whole new infrastructure, which we do not need.

The Green Belt Land under consideration has great recreational value to the local community. It is enjoyed by many runners, riders, walkers and cyclists. Such activities should be encouraged with so much focus being on the public taking regular outdoor exercise. In my opinion taking our dog for a 30 minute walk across this Green Belt land is much more rewarding than going to a gym in town.