BASE HEADER
Gwrthwynebu
Revised Development Strategy
ID sylw: 53065
Derbyniwyd: 16/07/2013
Ymatebydd: Mr Carl Stevens
Whilst the broad spread of expansion is admirable the position has changed to a concentration south of Warwick/Leamington. On this basis the broad allocation is not working and the plan should be reconsidered again with perhaps a new village or town created in an appropriate location.
Also the revisions from the original plan are unfair and unbalanced. Milverton has been removed completely following representations putting more pressure on other villages to take up the slack. The villages have equally good arguments against the use of green belt and have not been similarly listened to between the original and now revised plan. In Hampton Magna case the houses increased from max 100 to 150 despite similar arguments against.
Whilst the broad spread of expansion is admirable the position has changed to a concentration south of Warwick/Leamington. On this basis the broad allocation is not working and the plan should be reconsidered again with perhaps a new village or town created in an appropriate location.
Also the revisions from the original plan are unfair and unbalanced. Milverton has been removed completely following representations putting more pressure on other villages to take up the slack. The villages have equally good arguments against the use of green belt and have not been similarly listened to between the original and now revised plan. In Hampton Magna case the houses increased from max 100 to 150 despite similar arguments against.