Testun llawn:
Dear Sir/Madam,
Please find below my various representations with regard to the proposed site options.
In line with the report I wish to make representations on a number of points as detailed below.
1. Introduction
No comment
2. Background
No comment
3. Who are Gypsies and Travellers?
No comment
4. What are the Issues?
No comment
5. Policy Background
SUPPORT
National policy is correct in advocating that (1) local planning authorities work together to identify sites and (2) that decision-taking protects Green Belt from inappropriate development and makes enforcement more effective.
On Point (1) it is therefore extremely worrying that Warwick District Council (WDC) is no longer working with other authorities to consider plans on a cross-authority basis, which it has a duty to do under the 2011 Localism Act. On point (2) WDC makes no distinction between Green Belt and non-Green Belt sites in its policy criteria so again contradicts national policy.
6. Evidence Base
No comment
7. Local Plan Requirements
OBJECT
The policy criteria listed by WDC are sensible.
However they omit crucial aspects of national guidance including (1) that plan-making and decision-taking should protect Green Belt from inappropriate development and (2) sites must be in appropriate locations. Why?
There is also the fact that WDC is no longer working on a cross-authority basis to provide sites. Again, why when much of WDC is covered by Green Belt (80%)? Surely by definition travellers are nomadic and the requirement for pitches should not be restricted to Warwick District?
8. Identification of Potential Sites
OBJECT
Section 8.1 is inadequate. WDC should list all sites within it's ownership and explain why it considers each site to be unacceptable.
Section 8.3, in which WDC is seeking to identify sites itself is a total dereliction of its duty under the 2011 Localism Act. WDC contains a high proportion of Green Belt and the Council should be looking to share supply of sites in appropriate locations with other authorities.
Site listing criteria should distinguish first whether locations are appropriate according to national and local planning policy. This is a planning document and land ownership (and willingness to sell) should not be a concern due to CPO powers.
9. Sites for consideration and comment
10. Table of Sites
GT01 Land adjacent to the Colbalt Centre, Siskin Drive
No Comment
GT02 Land abutting the Fosse Way at its junction with the B425
No comment
GT03 Land at Barnwell Farm
No comment
GT04 Land at Harbury Lane, Fosse Way
No comment
GT05 Land at Tachbrook Hill Farm
No comment
GT06 Land at Park Farm, Spinney Farm
No comment
GT07 Land at Stoneleigh Road
No comment
GT08 Depot to the west side of Cubbington Hill Farm
No comment
GT09 Land to the north east of M40
No comment
GT10 Land at Tollgate House and Guide Dogs National Breeding Centre
No comment
GT11 Land at Budbrooke Lodge, Racecourse and Hampton Road
No comment
GT12 Land north and west of Westham Lane (area of search)
No comment
GT13 Kites Nest Lane, Beausale
OBJECT
Kites Nest Lane, Beausale is totally inappropriate as a site for this purpose because:
1. It is a greenfield site in the open countryside within the Green Belt and any use for this purpose (or residential etc) is inappropriate development. The National Planning Policy Framework protects the Green Belt from inappropriate development.
2. Adopting it as a possible site would legitimise the long-running unauthorised applications to impose this illegal use at this site. WDC has rightly objected to such applications (although achieved nothing in removing the illegal settlement) and allowing development through this process would set an extremely damaging precedent in this and other areas that will attract significant public disapproval. National policy supports effective enforcement against unauthorised developments.
3. Access to local services is limited.
4. Its rural location means that this use cannot be integrated in the landscape without harming the character and amenity of the area in terms of aesthetic appearance and noise.
GT14 Warwick Road, Norton Lindsey
No comment
GT15 Land east of Europa Way
No comment
GT16 Land to north of Westham Lane and west of Wellesbourne Road, Barford (small site)
No comment
GT17 Service area west of A46 Old Budbrooke Way
No comment
GT18 Service area east of A46 Old Budbrooke Way
No comment
GT19 Land off Birmingham Road, Budbrooke, Oaklands Farm
OBJECT
Land at Oaklands Farm, Birmingham Road is totally inappropriate as a site for this purpose because:
1. It is in the Green Belt and any use for this purpose (or residential etc) is inappropriate development. The National Planning Policy Framework protects the Green Belt from inappropriate development.
2. Access to the road network is not safe - Birmingham Road is 2-way and heavily congested, particularly during peak times. There was a fatal traffic accident immediately outside the proposed site in 2010.
3. It is adjacent to the Grand Union Canal running locally between Warwick and Hatton offering views of Warwick Castle and St Nicholas Church.
As stated on numerous websites including Hatton Parish Council, the Canal & River Trust and Enjoy Warwick, (to name but a few), Hatton is home to one of the most picturesque spots on the Grand Union Canal.
The famous Hatton Flights, otherwise known as "The Stairway to Heaven" contains 21 locks in less than two miles, raising or dropping the Grand Union Canal by 146.5 feet. They are an excellent example of original and recent canal engineering providing two hundred years of waterways history at a key location on the Grand Union canal.
As part of a Heritage Lottery Funded Working Boats Project, a pair of restored working boats that once worked this route are moored on the Hatton Flights. A recent Heritage Lottery funded project has also made some of the local history available to visitors through information panels, leaflets, a family wildlife trail along the Hatton Flights, education packs and picnic benches.
This is a very popular towpath for boaters, walkers, runners and cyclists alike whose amenity will be greatly impacted by the occupation/development of this site.
Its location will further impact on the visual amenity of the Grand Union Canal.
4. The site may be prone to flooding due to its location next to a water network.
GT20 Land at Junction 15 of M40
No comment
Do you have any other suggestions for land within this district that you think would be suitable for use as a Gypsy and Traveller site?
No comment
I look forward to receiving your comments and trust that the Council will make a well informed and well researched decision when it comes to sites to be considered in greater detail.