BASE HEADER
Gwrthwynebu
Gypsy and Traveller Site Options
ID sylw: 55842
Derbyniwyd: 24/06/2013
Ymatebydd: Lorraine Simms
Site owner using this allocation to argue their appeal should be allowed for traveller site on the land. What were WDC thinking of when they allocated this site - how did it get included? This is a ridiculous situation.
We were alarmed to hear thatthe appellant's agent has recently written to the Planning Inspectorate to reiterate his assertion that the site should be granted permission because it is included in the consultation document.
What on earth were WDC thinking of when they included Kites Nest Lane as a potential site in the consultation document? We were told by a representative of WDC that a number of potential sites were put forward by local residents but deemed to be unsuitable and did not make it onto the list. How therefore did Kites Nest Lane manage to get included? So, now we have this ridiculous latest situation on our hands.