South Warwickshire Local Plan

Gwrthwynebu

Revised Development Strategy

ID sylw: 56893

Derbyniwyd: 29/07/2013

Ymatebydd: Nick Shakespere

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Object to RDS on following grounds:

Location of Growth

A major re- think of if and where new houses are really needed then perhaps land closer to Coventry or even North of Leamington would be a better balanced fit for a plan to be more sustainable on environmental, economic and social grounds.

Environment:

* One of the main generators of income to the local economy is the success of Warwick castle. The views from Warwick castle would be significantly disturbed if the Local Plan were to be approved.

* The proposal to build houses on the land South of Warwick on Gallows Hill off Banbury Road would mean the green views from Warwick Castle would be destroyed - any proposal needs to be environmentally sensitive.

Air Quality:

* Air quality which is already over the guidelines in both Smith Street & Jury Street, Warwick would be made worse.

* What action is being taken to ensure the resolution of known & forecast air quality problems ?

* The significant detrimental effects on health buildings as a result of the increase in gas emissions is unsustainable.

Traffic and Transport:

* The Plan would result in a significant increase in car journeys & traffic congestion in and around Warwick (particularly on St Nicholas Street, Mill Street, Banbury Road, Myton Road & Bridge End)

* the proposed mitigation schemes will result in complete chaos given that the Avon bridge can only have 2 lanes and so this will result in a bottleneck, particularly at peak periods & when there is a major incident such as a crash on the M40, roadworks,

* need for Emergency vehicles to pass.

* The accuracy of the assumptions used to predict traffic flows need to be checked.

* Increasing numbers of cars because of extra housing will result in an even bigger car parking problem unless attractive alternative means of transport are provided.

* The current provision of a cycle path on both Myton Road and the Banbury Roads are not fit for purpose as they are not continuous & likely to lead to more accidents.

* Safety of pedestrians (particularly the young, old and disabled) and cyclists taking in crossing roads and access shops, services such as doctors, schools and businesses are not properly considered in the revised local plan.

* the main practical problem seems to be the likely bottleneck of traffic on the bridge over the River Avon on the Banbury Road, Warwick.

* traffic should be managed away from the bridge on Banbury Road - why is this not included in the revised plan when it is clearly needed ?

* all traffic needs to be diverted away from the centre of Warwick. A super highway bypass is needed which would enable the plan to be sustainable.

Heritage:

The importance of the Conservation Area south of Warwick, including Bridge End.

What special measures are being taken to mitigate the impact of traffic and consequence noise and pollution on the conservation area in the light of its architectural, historic, tourist and environmental importance.?

Infrastructure:

* pressure on local services such as the hospital, social services and education would be too much.

* the drainage systems of South Warwick near and around the river already appear to be inadequate for current users.

Testun llawn:

I object to the Local Plan - Revised Development Strategy and wish this to be recorded formally and comments passed to the ultimate decision making authority

In summary,I believe the proposal is not sustainable on environmental, economic and social grounds

1. Housing needs - the assumption of business growth & housing needs are unrealistic given that there are already over 5,000 empty homes in Warwickshire, 5 business units on Smith Street in Warwick unlet, land next to Morrisons supermarket unsaleable to business & many business units in both Leamington & Warwick that have become unlet or charity shops because businesses are not viable, given the economic conditions. Furthermore, there are already a number of residential developments that have recently been built or started within close proximity of the proposed developments & they are still not sold or occupied. With the proposal for housing to be built near Lighthorne Heath, any possible increase in jobs for Jaguar Land Rover is already covered. As a result, the likelihood is that the number of commuters would increase as a result of more houses South of Warwick - putting more pressure on roads in & around both Warwick & Leamington train stations which is already high at peak times.

2. Car parking - there is already s significant shortage of adequate car parking space in & around Warwick. Despite the building of the Warwick Technology Park & the plan for adequate car parking spaces, currently over 40 cars are parking on the verge of Gallows Hill. Increasing numbers of cars because of extra housing will result in an even bigger car parking problem unless attractive alternative means of transport are provided. The current provision of a cycle path on both Myton Road & the Banbury Roads are not fit for purpose as they are not continuous & likely to lead to more accidents.

3. Environment - one of the main generators of income to the local economy is the success of Warwick castle. The views from Warwick castle would be significantly disturbed if the Local Plan were to be approved. The proposal to build houses on the land South of Warwick on Gallows Hill off Banbury Road would mean the green views from Warwick Castle would be destroyed - any proposal needs to be environmentally sensitive.

4. Gas emissions - the air quality is already over the guidelines in both Smith Street & Jury Street, Warwick. The Local Plan would result in a significant increase in car journeys & traffic congestion in & around Warwick (particularly on St Nicholas Street, Mill Street, Banbury Road, Myton Road & Bridge End) - what action is being taken to ensure the resolution of known & forecast air quality problems ? The significant detrimental effects on health & buildings as a result of the increase in gas emissions is unsustainable.

5. Traffic mitigation schemes - the proposed mitigation schemes will only result in complete chaos given that the Avon bridge can only have 2 lanes & so this will result in a bottleneck, particularly at peak periods & when there is a major incident such as a crash on the M40, roadworks, need for Emergency vehicles to pass. The accuracy of the the assumptions used to predict traffic flows need to be checked.

6. Safety of pedestrians (particularly the young, old and disabled) and cyclists are not properly considered in the revised local plan when taking into account their needs to cross roads and access shops, services such as doctors, schools and businesses. This applies particularly to Myton Road, Banbury Road, St Nicholas & Smith Streets - especially, given the significant number of residents and visitors and road users requiring access to Warwick Castle, St Nicholas Park, Warwick School, Myton School & Coten End School.

7. The importance of the Conservation Area south of Warwick, including Bridge End. What special measures are being taken to mitigate the impact of traffic and consequence noise and pollution on the conservation area in the light of its architectural, historic, tourist and environmental importance.

8. Infrastructure - the pressure on local services such as the hospital, social services and education would be too much. They are already suffering. Furthermore, the drainage systems of South Warwick near and around the river already appear to be inadequate for current users.

Overall, the main practical problem seems to be the likely bottleneck of traffic on the bridge over the River Avon on the Banbury Road, Warwick. What is needed is a plan in which traffic is actively managed away from the bridge on Banbury Road - why is this not included in the revised plan when it is clearly needed ? and all traffic needs to be diverted away from the centre of Warwick. A super highway bypass is needed which would enable the plan to be sustainable and a major re- think of if and where new houses are really needed then perhaps land closer to Coventry or even North of Leamington would be a better balanced fit for a plan to be more sustainable on environmental, economic and social grounds.

Please acknowledge safe receipt of these comments and confirm they will be passed on to the appropriate decision making authority.