South Warwickshire Local Plan

Cefnogi

Revised Development Strategy

ID sylw: 59947

Derbyniwyd: 28/07/2013

Ymatebydd: Ms Philippa Greasley

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Supports the Revised Development Strategy. Supports the absence of development on the North Leamington Green Belt around Milverton and Blackdown as this land meets the 5 key roles of Green Belt and is an excellent and well used cultural and exercise related resource. If the Joint Strategic Housing Needs Analysis identifies an increase in the number of houses above those currently proposed, there is sufficient non-Green Belt land to accommodate this additional development. Proposals represent a fair distribution of housing. Commuting, pollution and infrastructure can be minimised as most of the new development is located close to where employment opportunities already exist and also maximises the opportunity for people to live close to their place of work, improving quality of life. There is ample space to build to the south of Leamington and focussing in one broad area ensures adequate public services can be provided and developed to meet the needs of the new population. The transport assessment clearly shows that development in the North would generate more traffic congestion in the district.

RDS provides for improvement to the road network South of Leamington to relieve the existing congestion and to cater for the new development. It is possible that mitigation methods may need to be employed in the Southern areas to reduce pollution and congestion but the work needed to do this would be less than that needed for the north. Putting the country park in the South next to the existing houses, with new housing beyond it, would make the green-park more accessible, crossed by cycle-ways and acting as a green-lung to reduce air pollution. The exclusion of development in the North Leamington green belt enables the plan to comply with the NPPF, any attempt to reintroduce this area would be opposed as no exceptional circumstances exist.

Supports the Revised Development Strategy. Pleased that the Council has recognised that the exceptional circumstances to develop the Green Belt to the North of Leamington do not exist and that it is vital to preserve the limited green space between Leamington and Kenilworth as there is a risk that the area will merge into the West Midlands conurbation. RDS proposes: new development close to employment opportunities where there is unlimited green space to the south of Leamington; removes the proposal for 2000 houses on the North Leamington Green Belt; proposes better use of brownfield sites and now only 325 further houses are proposed on Greenfield land; improvements to the road network (it is important these are carried out as part of a coordinated plan); the necessary schools and other infra-structure to support the new development; a fair distribution of new housing across the District. Requests the Council keeps the housing requirement to a minimum and if more houses are required following the Joint Strategic Housing Needs Analysis there is sufficient non Green Belt land to accommodate this additional development.

Testun llawn:

I am pleased that the Council has recognised that the Exceptional Circumstances to develop the Green...

I am pleased that the Council has recognised that the Exceptional Circumstances to develop the Green Belt to the North of Leamington do not exist and that as a consequence the risks of the Local Plan being found unsound at public enquiry are reduced. It is vital to preserve the limited green space between Leamington and Kenilworth, otherwise there is a real risk that Leamington and Warwick will merge with the West Midlands conurbation.
The Revised Development Strategy proposes that a substantial proportion of the new development is located close to where there are employment opportunities (to the South of Leamington & Warwick) providing an opportunity for people to live close to their place of work. Furthermore there is almost unlimited green space to the south of Leamington where the nearest town is Banbury.
The Revised Development Strategy removes the proposal to build 2000 houses on the North Leamington Green Belt. Through the better use of Brownfield sites only 325 further houses are proposed on Greenfield land than was proposed in the Preferred Options for the Local Plan published last year.
The Revised Development Strategy provides improvements to the road network South of Leamington to relieve the existing congestion and to cater for the new development. It is important that these road improvements are carried out as part of a coordinated plan. Traffic surveys show that road improvements can cope with the planned new development and that locating the majority of the development South of Leamington will reduce traffic movements, ease congestion and reduce pollution.
The Revised Development Strategy provides for the necessary schools and other infra-structure to support the new development.
The Revised Development Strategy has a fair distribution of new housing across the District. 16% of the new houses will be in the Green Belt North of Leamington, at Thickthorn and Lillington. 15% of the proposed development will be in Warwickshire Villages.
I do not wish to challenge the number of new houses included in the Revised Development Strategy, which I understand has been estimated in accordance with guidance issued by the coalition Government, but I ask the Council to keep the housing requirement to a minimum. Should more houses be required because of the Joint Strategic Housing Needs Analysis being performed with Coventry City Council, I believe that there is sufficient non Green Belt land to accommodate this additional development.

---

I write to support the New Local Plan Revised Development Strategy; in particular I support the absence of development on the North Leamington Green Belt around Milverton and Blackdown.
It is essential that the plan does not return to a scheme involving any development on the North Leamington Green Belt. The Green Belt in this area meets the 5 key roles of Green Belt and is an excellent and well used cultural and exercise related resource. Development in Kenilworth, Baginton and Lillington already take land from this essential Green Belt and further development on it would not be sustainable. It must not be permitted.
I would also like to make the following points:
1. A Joint Strategic Housing Needs Analysis is currently being performed with Coventry City Council. If this review identifies that it is necessary to increase the number of houses above those currently proposed I believe that there is sufficient non Green Belt land to accommodate this additional development.
2. The Revised Development Strategy has a fair distribution of new housing across the District. It is fair because there are still plans for new houses in the Green Belt at Thickthorn and Lillington as well as proposed development in villages.
3. The Revised Development Strategy proposes that most of the new development is located close to where employment opportunities already exist (e.g. industrial parks to the South of Leamington & Warwick) this provides an opportunity for people to live close to their place of work, reducing or eliminating commuting for many people, reducing pollution & improving quality of life. Furthermore there is ample space to build to the south of Leamington as the next nearest town is Banbury.
4. Focusing development in the South, in one broad area, ensures adequate public services can be provided and developed to meet the needs of the new population. These services can be designed to meet the exact needs of that new population and planned within easy walking and cycling distance, minimising traffic congestion. If development were to be more spread across the district public services would have to be developed in an inferior and unacceptable "make-do-and-mend" fashion which would provide poorer levels of service to both existing and new residents in those areas.
5. The Revised Development Strategy provides for improvement to the road network South of Leamington to relieve the existing congestion and to cater for the new development. The transport assessment clearly shows that development in the North would generate more traffic congestion in the district as it would have forced people to travel south to employment land, shopping (e.g. supermarkets) and the M40. Loss of vital Green Belt recreation land would also have resulted in more people travelling by car for recreation.
6. It is possible that mitigation methods may need to be employed in the Southern areas to reduce pollution and congestion but the work needed to do this would be less than for development in the North. For instance putting the country park in the South next to the existing houses, with new housing beyond it, would make the green-park more accessible. It could be crossed by cycle-ways and would act as a green-lung to reduce air pollution.
In conclusion the exclusion of development in the North Leamington Green Belt enables the plan to comply with the NPPF. Any attempt to re-introduce development in the North Leamington Green Belt would be unacceptable and be bitterly opposed as no exceptional circumstances exist; the land is a vital and immeasurable resource for the future of the district and is critical to its future sustainability.
Development in the South reduces traffic congestion and reduces air pollution, it enables better provision of public services and other facilities with better access to the employment hubs in the South.

[dangos mwy]