Testun llawn:
PART B - COMMENTING ON THE VILLAGE HOUSING OPTIONS
LEEK WOOTTON -Page 54 & 55
OBJECTION -1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Preferred options
* VERY BITTY PREFERRED OPTIONS -why leave the police playing field out of the option?
*
* MANY OTHER ITEMS TO CONSIDER - SEWERAGE, ROADS, PATHS, TRAFFIC, ETC.
*
* WOODCOTE & IT'S GROUNDS WOULD BE SPOILT
*
* POLICE AUTHORITY IN CHARGE OF SELLING OFF THEIR LAND HAVE CHANGED THE PLANS MANY TIMES OVER A LONG PERIOD. I'm sure the millions could be found to move the communications building.
*
It would be good to go with the planning consent and make that a retirement area.
SUPPORT
* THAT WE HAVE TO BUILD HOUSES IN LEEK WOOTTON AS ORDERED BY GOVERNMENT NATIONAL & LOCAL
SO
* I WOULD SUPPORT BUILDING ON DISCOUNTED OPTION 7 ONLY
We came to Leek Wootton 40 years ago and at that time developers had started to build about 90 properties to add to the small development of Tidmarsh Road & The Hamlet, expanding The Hamlet to include Croft Road and The Meadows.
I agree we do not want houses to join up with Kenilworth, we would lose our village status & identity.
Building houses at Discounted Option 7 would be more suitable and looking at the map appear a preferable area for construction, it would be a more balanced view.
LOCAL PLAN - LEEK WOOTTON -Page 54 & 55
PART C - COMMENTING ON THE INDICATIVE SETTLEMENT BOUNDARIES
I FAIL TO SEE WHY SO MANY OF THE PROPERTIES HAVE NOT BEEN INCLUDED
IF DISCOUTED OPTION 7 WERE INCLUDED FOR HOUSING IT WOULD MAKE A FAR MORE BALANCED VIEW OF OUR VILLAGE.
IN ITS PRESENT FORMAT POLICE HQ STANDS OUT LIKE A SORE THUMB!