BASE HEADER

My view is that option one Burrow Hill is best, if only one site has to be chosen. However, 75 houses seems excessive, very greatly increasing the size of the village. A smaller number with better gardens would be more in character. If a new site has to be found for a new village hall, burrow hill site is the obvious position, in this case perhaps thirty houses would be more appropriate and over 20 years or so new sites could be found.