BASE HEADER

We believe that site number 1 is the best for the village, it is away from most existing housing and continues the ribbon development of the village.
Sites 3 and 4 would also continue that line
Site number 7 is not a good idea for the village as it so close the proposed HS rail link and sandwiches those properties between the rail and a housing estate
Not exactly a rural location, and bunching up that area.
Cromwell Lane is a rat run in the morning and afternoon and access to site 7 is onto Cromwell lane so the 44 new houses and therefore cars will add to the congestion as they try to access Cromwell Lane from that middle section.
Site 7 benefits the owners of the land not the village.


Judi and Mike Hibberd