BASE HEADER

I write on behalf of myself and and my wife to object to the inclusion of the proposed site GT19 (Oaklands Farm)
We have already expressed our objection to the inclusion of this site previously, but would like to make the following additional comments about the points made in the report to members in proposing this site
It is described as a previously developed site - the area suggested is a small green space, which is sometimes used by the odd touring caravan
Services are already provided - my understanding is the only 'services' provided are a water tap and access to a flushing toilet.
There will obviously need to be significant costs in provided appropriate 'services' - is this proposal economically prudent given the proposal is for 5 pitches, when these costs could be incurred on another site for far more more pitches at probably a similar cost - surely a significant consideration for the council in the current economic climate?
Access and fewer movements of large vehicles - as I have previously stated very few touring caravans currently make use of this site - I am sure the owner can provide you with actual figures. I would suggest that there is likely to be significantly more movements of large vehicles as the travellers go about there day to day business, as this usually involves lorries I believe.
I have written to Budbrooke Parish Council to ask if they can confirm that there are places available at the school and GP surgery mentioned in the report.
Finally has consideration been given to the fact that a site almost opposite this proposal, has been included as a preferred option for additional housing?